World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
Netherlands
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Best Scientists

D-Index
182
Citations
157035
World Ranking
567
National Ranking
15

Medicine

D-Index
188
Citations
172373
World Ranking
270
National Ranking
7

Ewout W. Steyerberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ewout W. Steyerberg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,613 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ewout W. Steyerberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ewout W. Steyerberg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 188 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2019 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Ewout W. Steyerberg is affiliated with Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a notable emphasis on epidemiology, surgery, neurology, emergency medicine, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Emergency and Acute Care Studies

Steyerberg has contributed to several recent papers, such as:

  • "Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal" (2020), published in BMJ
  • "Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research" (2022), published in The Lancet Neurology
  • "Ten-Year Outcome of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Plus Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: The Randomized Controlled CROSS Trial" (2021), published in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review" (2022), published in npj Digital Medicine
  • "Interpreting area under the receiver operating characteristic curve" (2022), published in The Lancet Digital Health

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Hester F. Lingsma
  • David Menon
  • David van Klaveren
  • Andrew I.R. Maas
  • Daan Nieboer

Steyerberg's research has been published repeatedly in a range of journals and venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • PLoS ONE
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Among their recognitions, Steyerberg received an award from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2019.

Best Publications

  • A Randomized Trial of Intraarterial Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke

    D. Beumer;D. Beumer;J. Staals;J. Hofmeijer;J. Boiten

  • Assessing the performance of prediction models: a framework for traditional and novel measures.

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Andrew J. Vickers;Nancy R. Cook;Thomas Gerds

  • Clinical Prediction Models

    Ewout W. Steyerberg

  • Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration.

    Karel G.M. Moons;Douglas G. Altman;Johannes B. Reitsma;John P.A. Ioannidis

  • Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19: systematic review and critical appraisal

    Laure Wynants;Laure Wynants;Ben Van Calster;Ben Van Calster;Gary S Collins;Gary S Collins;Richard D Riley

  • Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis.

    Ewout W Steyerberg;Frank E Harrell;Gerard J.J.M Borsboom;M.J.C Eijkemans

  • Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

    Andrew I R Maas;David K Menon;P David Adelson;Nada Andelic

  • Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers

    Michael J. Pencina;Ralph B. D'Agostino;Ewout W. Steyerberg

  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial

    Joel Shapiro;J Jan B van Lanschot;Maarten C C M Hulshof;Pieter van Hagen

  • Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Yvonne Vergouwe

  • Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

    Ewout W Steyerberg;Nino Mushkudiani;Pablo Perel;Isabella Butcher

  • Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients.

    Pablo Perel;Miguel Arango;Tim Clayton

  • Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: prognostic model research.

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Karel G. M. Moons;Danielle A. van der Windt;Jill A. Hayden

  • Predictors of outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation. Results from an international trial of 9461 patients. The PURSUIT Investigators.

    Eric Boersma;Karen S. Pieper;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Robert G. Wilcox

  • A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models

    Evangelia Christodoulou;Jie Ma;Gary S. Collins;Ewout W. Steyerberg

  • Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials

    Francesco Costa;Francesco Costa;Francesco Costa;David van Klaveren;David van Klaveren;Stefan James;Dik Heg

  • The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses

    Peter C. Austin;Peter C. Austin;Ewout W. Steyerberg

  • Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics

    Ben Van Calster;Ben Van Calster;David J. McLernon;Maarten van Smeden;Laure Wynants;Laure Wynants

  • Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal-external, and external validation

    Ewout W. Steyerberg;Frank E. Harrell

  • Focus on: Contemporary Methods in Biostatistics (I)Regression Modeling StrategiesEstrategias para la elaboración de modelos estadísticos de regresión

    Eduardo Núñez;Ewout W. Steyerberg;Julio Núñez

Frequent Co-Authors

Hester F. Lingsma
Hester F. Lingsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ernst J. Kuipers
Ernst J. Kuipers Nanyang Technological University
Peter D. Siersema
Peter D. Siersema Radboud University
Andrew I. R. Maas
Andrew I. R. Maas University of Antwerp
Suzanne Polinder
Suzanne Polinder Erasmus University Rotterdam
Henriëtte A. Moll
Henriëtte A. Moll Erasmus University Rotterdam
J. Dik F. Habbema
J. Dik F. Habbema Erasmus University Rotterdam
M. G. Myriam Hunink
M. G. Myriam Hunink Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
Marie-Louise Essink-Bot University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens the door to diverse career paths and educational opportunities. Today, many health-related degrees are accessible online, offering flexibility for students and working professionals alike.

For those interested in nutrition and the science behind healthy eating, consider the best online food science degree programs. These programs cater to students looking to impact public health or launch a career in food and nutrition.

Aspiring healthcare leaders can build their management skills through top cahme-accredited mha programs. These accredited online options help professionals advance in hospital administration and health services management.

Registered nurses seeking career progression can benefit from online rn-bsn programs without clinicals. These programs eliminate the need for additional clinical hours, making it easier for working nurses to further their education.

If you’re focused on leadership and advanced practice nursing, the 1 year dnp program online options allow you to earn a terminal degree efficiently and enhance your clinical expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Ewout W. Steyerberg

Trending Scientists