World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Austria
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 160 773 707 3 3 2720 111808

Shahrokh F. Shariat publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shahrokh F. Shariat between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shahrokh F. Shariat published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 97.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 303 publications in 2021. 144 of the 2,832 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 303. Peak 303 publications in 2021. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 33 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 37 publications 2007: 55 publications 2008: 91 publications 2009: 103 publications 2010: 115 publications 2011: 131 publications 2012: 158 publications 2013: 159 publications 2014: 167 publications 2015: 149 publications 2016: 127 publications 2017: 153 publications 2018: 175 publications 2019: 159 publications 2020: 233 publications 2021: 303 publications 2022: 137 publications 2023: 120 publications 2024: 106 publications 2025: 38 publications
1997 2025

2,832 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shahrokh F. Shariat: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 4
1999 11
2000 5
2001 16
2002 9
2003 18
2004 33
2005 19
2006 37
2007 55
2008 91
2009 103
2010 115
2011 131
2012 158
2013 159
2014 167
2015 149
2016 127
2017 153
2018 175
2019 159
2020 233
2021 303
2022 137
2023 120
2024 106
2025 38
Total 2,832
Download as CSV

Shahrokh F. Shariat publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shahrokh F. Shariat sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,796+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 2,720 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100 2,720
Download as CSV

Shahrokh F. Shariat D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shahrokh F. Shariat sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 160–161 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 160 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69 160
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in Austria Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in Austria Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Austria Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Medicine in Austria Leader Award
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts

Overview

Shahrokh F. Shariat is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Urology, Oncology, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics covered in Shahrokh F. Shariat's work include:

  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Shahrokh F. Shariat include:

  • Pierre I. Karakiewicz (223 co-publications)
  • Alberto Briganti (190 co-publications)
  • Benjamin Pradère (178 co-publications)
  • Ekaterina Laukhtina (159 co-publications)
  • Keiichiro Mori (152 co-publications)

Shariat has published extensively in these notable venues:

  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations (55 publications)
  • European Urology Focus (52 publications)
  • Current Opinion in Urology (50 publications)
  • World Journal of Urology (45 publications)
  • European Urology Oncology (39 publications)

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Shahrokh F. Shariat include:

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ), 2021, European Urology
  • Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update, 2020, European Urology
  • Bladder cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, 2021, Annals of Oncology
  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update, 2023, European Urology

Shahrokh F. Shariat has received recognition as a Member of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts.

Best Publications

  • Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer

    Maximilian Burger;James W.F. Catto;Guido Dalbagni;H. Barton Grossman

  • EAU Guidelines on Non-Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2016.

    Marko Babjuk;Andreas Böhle;Maximilian Burger;Otakar Capoun

  • EAU Guidelines on Non–Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2013

    Marko Babjuk;Maximilian Burger;Richard Zigeuner;Shahrokh F. Shariat

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma: 2015 Update

    Morgan Rouprêt;Marko Babjuk;Eva Compérat;Richard Zigeuner

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update.

    Marko Babjuk;Marko Babjuk;Maximilian Burger;Eva M. Compérat;Paolo Gontero

  • Outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy: A series from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration

    Vitaly Margulis;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Surena F. Matin;Ashish M. Kamat

  • Outcomes of radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a contemporary series from the Bladder Cancer Research Consortium.

    Shahrokh F. Shariat;Pierre I. Karakiewicz;Ganesh S. Palapattu;Yair Lotan

  • Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

    Andrew J. Stephenson;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Michael J. Zelefsky;Michael W. Kattan

  • Distribution of metastatic sites in renal cell carcinoma: a population-based analysis

    M. Bianchi;M. Sun;C. Jeldres;S. F. Shariat

  • Adjuvant Nivolumab versus Placebo in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma.

    Dean F Bajorin;J Alfred Witjes;Jürgen E Gschwend;Michael Schenker

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

    Giacomo Novara;Vincenzo Ficarra;Raymond C. Rosen;Walter Artibani

  • Gender and Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Review of Etiology, Biology, and Outcomes

    Jakub Dobruch;Siamak Daneshmand;Margit Fisch;Yair Lotan

  • Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Oncologic Outcome After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

    Giacomo Novara;Vincenzo Ficarra;Simone Mocellin;Thomas E. Ahlering

  • European guidelines on upper tract urothelial carcinomas: 2013 update.

    Morgan Rouprêt;Marko Babjuk;Eva Compérat;Richard Zigeuner

  • Distribution of metastatic sites in patients with prostate cancer: A population-based analysis

    Giorgio Gandaglia;Giorgio Gandaglia;Firas Abdollah;Firas Abdollah;Jonas Schiffmann;Vincent Trudeau

  • Perioperative Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Compared With Open Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

    Quoc Dien Trinh;Quoc Dien Trinh;Jesse Sammon;Maxine Sun;Praful Ravi

  • Prognostic factors in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: a comprehensive review of the current literature.

    Giovanni Lughezzani;Maximilian Burger;Vitaly Margulis;Surena F. Matin

  • Durvalumab alone and durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (DANUBE): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

    Thomas Powles;Michiel S van der Heijden;Daniel Castellano;Matthew D Galsky

  • Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

    Peter R. Carroll

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz University of Montreal
Francesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Alberto Briganti
Alberto Briganti Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Yair Lotan
Yair Lotan The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Maxine Sun
Maxine Sun Harvard Medical School
Paul Perrotte
Paul Perrotte University of Montreal
Fred Saad
Fred Saad University of Montreal
Markus Graefen
Markus Graefen Universität Hamburg
Morgan Rouprêt
Morgan Rouprêt Université Paris Cité
Quoc-Dien Trinh
Quoc-Dien Trinh Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of medicine continues to evolve, there are a variety of related online degrees and career pathways that offer flexibility and specialized training. Many students are looking for efficient ways to advance their healthcare careers, and online programs can provide both convenience and accelerated options.

Those interested in advanced nursing may explore online dnp programs. These programs allow nurses to achieve a terminal degree faster without compromising quality. If you are seeking a more accessible route, consider researching online dnp programs that emphasize student support and flexible learning environments.

For individuals who want to start their healthcare career quickly, fast lpn program options deliver the skills needed to become a licensed practical nurse in less time. Mental health also remains a growing specialty, with programs such as pmhnp online programs helping nurses fill critical gaps in psychiatric care.

Whether you are just starting in healthcare or looking to advance, these online pathways provide accessible, accelerated options tailored to today’s diverse medical careers.

Best Scientists Citing Shahrokh F. Shariat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles