World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
99
Citations
41965
World Ranking
8503
National Ranking
483

Arnulf Stenzl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnulf Stenzl sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,396 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Arnulf Stenzl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arnulf Stenzl sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Arnulf Stenzl is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany and works primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research encompasses several specialized subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Urology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The main topics covered by Stenzl's work include:

  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications

Stenzl has contributed to a number of recent papers in reputable journals, such as:

  • Current best practice for bladder cancer: a narrative review of diagnostics and treatments (2022) published in The Lancet
  • European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: An Organisation-wide Collaborative Effort to Adapt the European Association of Urology Guidelines Recommendations to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era (2020) published in European Urology
  • Talazoparib monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair alterations (TALAPRO-1): an open-label, phase 2 trial (2021) published in The Lancet Oncology
  • Improved Survival With Enzalutamide in Patients With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (2022) published in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Prostate-specific Antigen Testing as Part of a Risk-Adapted Early Detection Strategy for Prostate Cancer: European Association of Urology Position and Recommendations for 2021 (2021) published in European Urology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Stenzl include:

  • Steffen Rausch
  • Jens Bedke
  • Jörg Hennenlotter
  • Niklas Harland
  • Bastian Amend

The scientist has a significant publication presence in the following venues:

  • European Urology
  • The Journal of Urology
  • World Journal of Urology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Best Publications

  • Multipeptide immune response to cancer vaccine IMA901 after single-dose cyclophosphamide associates with longer patient survival

    Steffen Walter;Toni Weinschenk;Arnulf Stenzl;Romuald Zdrojowy

  • ARCHES: A Randomized, Phase III Study of Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Enzalutamide or Placebo in Men With Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

    Andrew J. Armstrong;Russell Z. Szmulewitz;Daniel P. Petrylak;Jeffrey Holzbeierlein

  • The Updated EAU Guidelines on Muscle-Invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer

    Arnulf Stenzl;Nigel C. Cowan;Maria De Santis;Gerhard Jakse

  • Retraction: Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult human testis

    Sabine Conrad;Markus Renninger;Jörg Hennenlotter;Tina Wiesner

  • Treatment of muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: Update of the EAU guidelines

    Arnulf Stenzl;Nigel C. Cowan;Maria De Santis;Markus A. Kuczyk

  • Unexpected Abundance of HLA Class II Presented Peptides in Primary Renal Cell Carcinomas

    Jörn Dengjel;Maria-Dorothea Nastke;Cécile Gouttefangeas;Gitsios Gitsioudis

  • Prevention and early detection of prostate cancer

    Jack Cuzick;Mangesh A Thorat;Gerald L Andriole;Otis W Brawley;Otis W Brawley

  • Clinical utility of the PCA3 urine assay in European men scheduled for repeat biopsy.

    Alexander Haese;Alexandre de la Taille;Hendrik van Poppel;Michael Marberger

  • Economic aspects of bladder cancer: what are the benefits and costs?

    K. D. Sievert;B. Amend;U. Nagele;D. Schilling

  • The Economics of Bladder Cancer: Costs and Considerations of Caring for This Disease

    Robert S. Svatek;Brent K. Hollenbeck;Sten Holmäng;Richard Lee

  • Photodynamic diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with hexaminolevulinate cystoscopy: a meta-analysis of detection and recurrence based on raw data

    Maximilian Burger;H. Barton Grossman;Michael Droller;Joerg Schmidbauer

  • ICUD-EAU international consultation on bladder cancer 2012: Radical cystectomy and bladder preservation for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

    Georgios Gakis;Jason Efstathiou;Seth P. Lerner;Michael S. Cookson

  • Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Options, patient selection, and outcomes

    Richard K. Lee;Hassan Abol-Enein;Walter Artibani;Bernard Bochner

  • Photodynamic diagnosis in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of prospective studies.

    Ingo Kausch;Martin Sommerauer;Francesco Montorsi;Arnulf Stenzl

  • Randomized Phase III Trial of Adjuvant Pazopanib Versus Placebo After Nephrectomy in Patients With Localized or Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

    Robert J. Motzer;Naomi B. Haas;Frede Donskov;Marine Gross-Goupil

  • CELLULAR AND HUMORAL IMMUNE RESPONSES IN PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA AFTER VACCINATION WITH ANTIGEN PULSED DENDRITIC CELLS

    Lorenz Holtl;Claudia Rieser;Christine Papesh;Reinhold Ramoner

  • Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder and the Upper Tract: Disparate Twins

    David A. Green;Michael Rink;Evanguelos Xylinas;Surena F. Matin

  • Hexaminolevulinate Guided Fluorescence Cystoscopy Reduces Recurrence in Patients With Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer

    Arnulf Stenzl;Maximilian Burger;Yves Fradet;Lance A. Mynderse

  • Self-adjuvanted mRNA vaccination in advanced prostate cancer patients: a first-in-man phase I/IIa study

    Hubert Kübler;Birgit Scheel;Ulrike Gnad-Vogt;Kurt Miller

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines Office Rapid Reaction Group: An Organisation-wide Collaborative Effort to Adapt the European Association of Urology Guidelines Recommendations to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era.

    Maria J. Ribal;Philip Cornford;Alberto Briganti;Thomas Knoll

Frequent Co-Authors

Georg Bartsch
Georg Bartsch University of Innsbruck
Hans-Georg Rammensee
Hans-Georg Rammensee University of Tübingen
Stefan Stevanovic
Stefan Stevanovic University of Tübingen
Wilhelm K. Aicher
Wilhelm K. Aicher University of Tübingen
Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Heinz-Peter Schlemmer German Cancer Research Center
George N. Thalmann
George N. Thalmann University of Bern
Alexandre de la Taille
Alexandre de la Taille Université Paris Cité
Andrew J. Armstrong
Andrew J. Armstrong Duke University
J. Alfred Witjes
J. Alfred Witjes Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up new opportunities for those interested in healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school. Many professionals pursue alternative routes such as nursing or advanced practice degrees that offer flexibility, quicker completion times, and less reliance on in-person clinicals.

For registered nurses seeking to advance, consider the rn to bsn online programs without clinicals. These programs allow RNs to earn a bachelor’s degree fully online, making it easier for working professionals to continue their education. Similarly, accelerated options like fast track medical lpn programs help students start their nursing careers quickly, with flexible schedules and online coursework.

For those interested in the highest level of nursing practice, there are now shortest dnp programs online that let qualified nurses earn their Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time. Some programs may even allow students to enroll in a dnp program without clinical hours, making the process even more accessible for busy professionals or those with prior experience. These pathways can provide key stepping stones toward leadership, advanced practice, or education roles within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Arnulf Stenzl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles