World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
George N. Thalmann

George N. Thalmann

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
32058
World Ranking
12598
National Ranking
171

George N. Thalmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George N. Thalmann sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 699 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

George N. Thalmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George N. Thalmann sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

George N. Thalmann is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland. Their research primarily covers medicine with specialized focus areas including surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, molecular biology, and oncology.

Their work spans several main topics in medical research:

  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Frequent collaborators in their research include Marianna Kruithof-de Julio, Sofia Karkampouna, Federico La Manna, Thomas Kueffer, and Hildegard Tanner.

George N. Thalmann has published extensively in journals such as EP Europace, British Journal of Urology, The Journal of Urology, European Urology, and Cancer Research.

Their recent notable publications include:

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines, 2020, European Urology
  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2023 Guidelines, 2023, European Urology
  • The 2021 Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma, 2021, European Urology
  • The Role of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Prostate Cancer Tumorigenesis, 2020, Cancers
  • Patient-derived xenografts and organoids model therapy response in prostate cancer, 2021, Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial

    Nicholas D. James;Nicholas D. James;Matthew R. Sydes;Noel W. Clarke;Malcolm David Mason

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines

    J. Alfred Witjes;Harman Max Bruins;Richard Cathomas;Eva M. Compérat

  • Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

    Christopher C Parker;Nicholas D James;Christopher D Brawley;Noel W Clarke

  • Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer Today--A Homogeneous Series Without Neoadjuvant Therapy

    Stephan Madersbacher;Werner Hochreiter;Fiona Burkhard;George N. Thalmann

  • Impact of Molecular Subtypes in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer on Predicting Response and Survival after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

    Roland Seiler;Roland Seiler;Hussam Al Deen Ashab;Nicholas Erho;Bas W G van Rhijn

  • An international field study of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: A questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer

    George van Andel;Andrew Bottomley;Sophie D. Fosså;Fabio Efficace

  • Survival with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the "Docetaxel Era": Data from 917 Patients in the Control Arm of the STAMPEDE Trial (MRC PR08, CRUK/06/019)

    Nicholas David James;Melissa R. Spears;Noel W. Clarke;David P. Dearnaley

  • The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study.

    Agostino Mattei;Frank G. Fuechsel;Nivedita Bhatta Dhar;Sebastian H. Warncke

  • LNCaP progression model of human prostate cancer: androgen-independence and osseous metastasis.

    George N. Thalmann;Robert A. Sikes;Tony T. Wu;Armelle Degeorges

  • High aldehyde dehydrogenase activity identifies tumor-initiating and metastasis-initiating cells in human prostate cancer

    Christel van den Hoogen;Geertje van der Horst;Henry Cheung;Jeroen T. Buijs

  • Twenty Years Experience With an Ileal Orthotopic Low Pressure Bladder Substitute—Lessons to be Learned

    Urs E. Studer;Fiona C. Burkhard;Martin Schumacher;Thomas M. Kessler

  • Immediate versus deferred chemotherapy after radical cystectomy in patients with pT3–pT4 or N+ M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (EORTC 30994): an intergroup, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

    Cora N Sternberg;Iwona Skoneczna;J Martijn Kerst;Peter Albers

  • Establishing human prostate cancer cell xenografts in bone: Induction of osteoblastic reaction by prostate‐specific antigen‐producing tumors in athymic and SCID/bg mice using LNCaP and lineage‐derived metastatic sublines

    Tony T. Wu;Robert A. Sikes;Quanjun Cui;George N. Thalmann

  • Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Options, patient selection, and outcomes

    Richard K. Lee;Hassan Abol-Enein;Walter Artibani;Bernard Bochner

  • Outcome After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

    Nivedita Bhatta Dhar;Eric A. Klein;Alwyn M. Reuther;George N. Thalmann

  • Critical analysis of bladder sparing with trimodal therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer : a systematic review

    Guillaume Ploussard;Siamak Daneshmand;Jason A. Efstathiou;Harry W. Herr

  • Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC)

    Francesco Soria;Francesco Soria;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Seth P. Lerner;Hans Martin Fritsche

  • PELVIC LYMPH NODE METASTASES FROM BLADDER CANCER: OUTCOME IN 83 PATIENTS AFTER RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AND PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY

    R.D. Mills;W.H. Turner;A. Fleischmann;R. Markwalder

  • Osteopontin: Possible Role in Prostate Cancer Progression

    George N. Thalmann;R. A. Sikes;R. E. Devoll;J. A. Kiefer

  • A Retrospective Analysis of 153 Patients Treated With or Without Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for Primary Stage T1 Grade 3 Bladder Cancer: Recurrence, Progression and Survival

    Osama Shahin;George N. Thalmann;Cyrill Rentsch;L. Mazzucchelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Urs E. Studer
Urs E. Studer University of Bern
Nicholas D. James
Nicholas D. James Institute of Cancer Research
Arnulf Stenzl
Arnulf Stenzl University of Tübingen
David P. Dearnaley
David P. Dearnaley Institute of Cancer Research
Malcolm David Mason
Malcolm David Mason Cardiff University
Matthew R. Sydes
Matthew R. Sydes University College London
Noel W. Clarke
Noel W. Clarke University of Salford
Inti Zlobec
Inti Zlobec University of Bern
Bernard H. Bochner
Bernard H. Bochner Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Chris Parker
Chris Parker Institute of Cancer Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about a future in healthcare but unsure if medical school is the right path? There are plenty of online degrees and alternative career options in the field. For those interested in patient care, some nursing schools with high acceptance rates make it more accessible to start a career in nursing. If you want to avoid lengthy entrance exams, you may also consider programs where you can find out, do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN.

For those who prefer administrative roles, consider a career in healthcare management with one of the healthcare administration degrees offered fully online. Or, explore in-demand positions as a medical coder with these medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid.

These flexible online options can help you begin a rewarding career in healthcare, whether you want to work with patients directly or support the industry behind the scenes.

Best Scientists Citing George N. Thalmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles