World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
George N. Thalmann

George N. Thalmann

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12597 11856 171 164 699 32058

George N. Thalmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by George N. Thalmann between 1993 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. George N. Thalmann published across 34 years, from 1993 to 2026, averaging 25.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 135 publications in 2023. 28 of the 864 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 135. Peak 135 publications in 2023. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 30 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 35 publications 2011: 43 publications 2012: 51 publications 2013: 46 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 60 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 40 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 135 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 25 publications 2026: 3 publications
1993 2026

864 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
George N. Thalmann: publications per year, 1993 to 2026
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 6
1997 4
1998 2
1999 6
2000 2
2001 6
2002 17
2003 13
2004 21
2005 13
2006 30
2007 18
2008 23
2009 17
2010 35
2011 43
2012 51
2013 46
2014 44
2015 42
2016 36
2017 60
2018 34
2019 25
2020 40
2021 30
2022 17
2023 135
2024 19
2025 25
2026 3
Total 864
Download as CSV

George N. Thalmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George N. Thalmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 699 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 699
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

George N. Thalmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George N. Thalmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

George N. Thalmann is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland. Their research primarily covers medicine with specialized focus areas including surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, molecular biology, and oncology.

Their work spans several main topics in medical research:

  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Frequent collaborators in their research include Marianna Kruithof-de Julio, Sofia Karkampouna, Federico La Manna, Thomas Kueffer, and Hildegard Tanner.

George N. Thalmann has published extensively in journals such as EP Europace, British Journal of Urology, The Journal of Urology, European Urology, and Cancer Research.

Their recent notable publications include:

  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines, 2020, European Urology
  • European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2023 Guidelines, 2023, European Urology
  • The 2021 Updated European Association of Urology Guidelines on Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma, 2021, European Urology
  • The Role of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts in Prostate Cancer Tumorigenesis, 2020, Cancers
  • Patient-derived xenografts and organoids model therapy response in prostate cancer, 2021, Nature Communications

Best Publications

  • Addition of docetaxel, zoledronic acid, or both to first-line long-term hormone therapy in prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): survival results from an adaptive, multiarm, multistage, platform randomised controlled trial

    Nicholas D. James;Nicholas D. James;Matthew R. Sydes;Noel W. Clarke;Malcolm David Mason

  • Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

    Christopher C Parker;Nicholas D James;Christopher D Brawley;Noel W Clarke

  • Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer Today--A Homogeneous Series Without Neoadjuvant Therapy

    Stephan Madersbacher;Werner Hochreiter;Fiona Burkhard;George N. Thalmann

  • Impact of Molecular Subtypes in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer on Predicting Response and Survival after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

    Roland Seiler;Roland Seiler;Hussam Al Deen Ashab;Nicholas Erho;Bas W G van Rhijn

  • An international field study of the EORTC QLQ-PR25: A questionnaire for assessing the health-related quality of life of patients with prostate cancer

    George van Andel;Andrew Bottomley;Sophie D. Fosså;Fabio Efficace

  • Survival with Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Prostate Cancer in the "Docetaxel Era": Data from 917 Patients in the Control Arm of the STAMPEDE Trial (MRC PR08, CRUK/06/019)

    Nicholas David James;Melissa R. Spears;Noel W. Clarke;David P. Dearnaley

  • The template of the primary lymphatic landing sites of the prostate should be revisited: results of a multimodality mapping study.

    Agostino Mattei;Frank G. Fuechsel;Nivedita Bhatta Dhar;Sebastian H. Warncke

  • LNCaP progression model of human prostate cancer: androgen-independence and osseous metastasis.

    George N. Thalmann;Robert A. Sikes;Tony T. Wu;Armelle Degeorges

  • High aldehyde dehydrogenase activity identifies tumor-initiating and metastasis-initiating cells in human prostate cancer

    Christel van den Hoogen;Geertje van der Horst;Henry Cheung;Jeroen T. Buijs

  • Twenty Years Experience With an Ileal Orthotopic Low Pressure Bladder Substitute—Lessons to be Learned

    Urs E. Studer;Fiona C. Burkhard;Martin Schumacher;Thomas M. Kessler

  • Immediate versus deferred chemotherapy after radical cystectomy in patients with pT3–pT4 or N+ M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (EORTC 30994): an intergroup, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

    Cora N Sternberg;Iwona Skoneczna;J Martijn Kerst;Peter Albers

  • Establishing human prostate cancer cell xenografts in bone: Induction of osteoblastic reaction by prostate‐specific antigen‐producing tumors in athymic and SCID/bg mice using LNCaP and lineage‐derived metastatic sublines

    Tony T. Wu;Robert A. Sikes;Quanjun Cui;George N. Thalmann

  • Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Options, patient selection, and outcomes

    Richard K. Lee;Hassan Abol-Enein;Walter Artibani;Bernard Bochner

  • Outcome After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection

    Nivedita Bhatta Dhar;Eric A. Klein;Alwyn M. Reuther;George N. Thalmann

  • Critical analysis of bladder sparing with trimodal therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer : a systematic review

    Guillaume Ploussard;Siamak Daneshmand;Jason A. Efstathiou;Harry W. Herr

  • Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC)

    Francesco Soria;Francesco Soria;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Seth P. Lerner;Hans Martin Fritsche

  • PELVIC LYMPH NODE METASTASES FROM BLADDER CANCER: OUTCOME IN 83 PATIENTS AFTER RADICAL CYSTECTOMY AND PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY

    R.D. Mills;W.H. Turner;A. Fleischmann;R. Markwalder

  • Osteopontin: Possible Role in Prostate Cancer Progression

    George N. Thalmann;R. A. Sikes;R. E. Devoll;J. A. Kiefer

  • A Retrospective Analysis of 153 Patients Treated With or Without Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for Primary Stage T1 Grade 3 Bladder Cancer: Recurrence, Progression and Survival

    Osama Shahin;George N. Thalmann;Cyrill Rentsch;L. Mazzucchelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Urs E. Studer
Urs E. Studer University of Bern
Nicholas D. James
Nicholas D. James Institute of Cancer Research
Arnulf Stenzl
Arnulf Stenzl University of Tübingen
David P. Dearnaley
David P. Dearnaley Institute of Cancer Research
Malcolm David Mason
Malcolm David Mason Cardiff University
Matthew R. Sydes
Matthew R. Sydes University College London
Noel W. Clarke
Noel W. Clarke University of Salford
Inti Zlobec
Inti Zlobec University of Bern
Bernard H. Bochner
Bernard H. Bochner Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Chris Parker
Chris Parker Institute of Cancer Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about a future in healthcare but unsure if medical school is the right path? There are plenty of online degrees and alternative career options in the field. For those interested in patient care, some nursing schools with high acceptance rates make it more accessible to start a career in nursing. If you want to avoid lengthy entrance exams, you may also consider programs where you can find out, do I need to take the TEAS test for LPN.

For those who prefer administrative roles, consider a career in healthcare management with one of the healthcare administration degrees offered fully online. Or, explore in-demand positions as a medical coder with these medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid.

These flexible online options can help you begin a rewarding career in healthcare, whether you want to work with patients directly or support the industry behind the scenes.

Best Scientists Citing George N. Thalmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles