World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wassim Kassouf

Wassim Kassouf

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15560 14641 647 616 652 26517

Wassim Kassouf publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wassim Kassouf between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wassim Kassouf published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 27.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2013. 80 of the 725 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2013. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 54 publications 2011: 37 publications 2012: 45 publications 2013: 57 publications 2014: 45 publications 2015: 37 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 43 publications 2021: 42 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 50 publications 2024: 47 publications 2025: 33 publications
2000 2025

725 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wassim Kassouf: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 8
2005 13
2006 17
2007 19
2008 15
2009 32
2010 54
2011 37
2012 45
2013 57
2014 45
2015 37
2016 29
2017 27
2018 26
2019 22
2020 43
2021 42
2022 22
2023 50
2024 47
2025 33
Total 725
Download as CSV

Wassim Kassouf publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wassim Kassouf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 641–660 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 652 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371 652
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Wassim Kassouf D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wassim Kassouf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wassim Kassouf is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and has a significant body of research in medicine, particularly focusing on surgery and oncology. Their work spans several subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, urology, and molecular biology, with an emphasis on cancer research and treatment.

The scientist's main research topics include bladder and urothelial cancer treatments, urinary and genital oncology studies, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, urological disorders and treatments, renal cell carcinoma treatment, esophageal cancer research and treatment, and prostate cancer treatment and research.

Key publications by Wassim Kassouf cover a range of influential studies:

  • Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2022 Update (2022), European Urology
  • Role of neutrophil extracellular traps in radiation resistance of invasive bladder cancer (2021), Nature Communications
  • Reporting Radical Cystectomy Outcomes Following Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis (2020), European Urology
  • Phase 2 Trial of Atezolizumab in Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: SWOG S1605 (2023), European Urology
  • International Bladder Cancer Group Consensus Statement on Clinical Trial Design for Patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-exposed High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (2021), European Urology

Their frequent co-authors include researchers such as Peter C. Black, Girish S. Kulkarni, Gautier Marcq, Ricardo Rendon, and Rodney H. Breau. Collaborations with these individuals reflect ongoing partnerships in urological and oncological research.

Wassim Kassouf's publications often appear in specialized journals and respected venues such as The Journal of Urology, Canadian Urological Association Journal, Journal of Clinical Oncology, European Urology, and Cancer Research. These journals correspond with the areas of surgery, oncology, and urology that comprise much of Kassouf's focus.

Best Publications

  • Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer

    Maximilian Burger;James W.F. Catto;Guido Dalbagni;H. Barton Grossman

  • Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations.

    Yannick Cerantola;Massimo Valerio;Beata Persson;Patrice Jichlinski

  • Critical analysis of bladder sparing with trimodal therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer : a systematic review

    Guillaume Ploussard;Siamak Daneshmand;Jason A. Efstathiou;Harry W. Herr

  • Epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC)

    Francesco Soria;Francesco Soria;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Seth P. Lerner;Hans Martin Fritsche

  • Prospective analysis of sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology and other urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer.

    Faysal A. Yafi;Fadi Brimo;Jordan Steinberg;Armen G. Aprikian

  • Lymphovascular Invasion Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Node-Negative Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

    Eiji Kikuchi;Vitaly Margulis;Pierre I. Karakiewicz;Marco Roscigno

  • Multicenter Assessment of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

    Homayoun Zargar;Patrick N. Espiritu;Adrian S. Fairey;Adrian S. Fairey;Laura S. Mertens

  • Repeat Transurethral Resection in Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review

    Marcus George Kwesi Cumberbatch;Beat Foerster;Beat Foerster;James W.F. Catto;Ashish M. Kamat

  • Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

    Evanguelos Xylinas;Evanguelos Xylinas;Michael Rink;Michael Rink;Eugene K. Cha;Thomas Clozel

  • An Updated Critical Analysis of the Treatment Strategy for Newly Diagnosed High-grade T1 (Previously T1G3) Bladder Cancer

    Girish S. Kulkarni;Oliver W. Hakenberg;Juergen E. Gschwend;George Thalmann

  • Characteristics and outcomes of patients with clinical T1 grade 3 urothelial carcinoma treated with radical cystectomy: results from an international cohort.

    Hans Martin Fritsche;Maximilian Burger;Robert S. Svatek;Claudio Jeldres

  • Soft Tissue Surgical Margin Status is a Powerful Predictor of Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy: A Multicenter Study of More Than 4,400 Patients

    Giacomo Novara;Robert S Svatek;Pierre I Karakiewicz;Eila Skinner

  • Discrepancy between clinical and pathological stage: external validation of the impact on prognosis in an international radical cystectomy cohort.

    Robert S. Svatek;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Giacomo Novara;Eila C. Skinner

  • Predicting Clinical Outcomes After Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

    Eugene K. Cha;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Matthias Kormaksson;Giacomo Novara

  • Preoperative Multivariable Prognostic Model for Prediction of Nonorgan Confined Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract

    Vitaly Margulis;Ramy F. Youssef;Pierre I. Karakiewicz;Yair Lotan

  • Gender differences in radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

    Shahrokh F. Shariat;Ricardo L. Favaretto;Amit Gupta;Hans-Martin Fritsche

  • Comparison of Oncologic Outcomes for Open and Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of 1249 Cases

    Umberto Capitanio;Shahrokh F. Shariat;Hendrik Isbarn;Alon Weizer

  • Contemporary outcomes of 2287 patients with bladder cancer who were treated with radical cystectomy: a Canadian multicentre experience.

    Faysal A. Yafi;Armen G. Aprikian;Joseph L. Chin;Yves Fradet

  • Lymph Node Density Is Superior to TNM Nodal Status in Predicting Disease-Specific Survival After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Analysis of Pooled Data From MDACC and MSKCC

    Wassim Kassouf;Piyush K. Agarwal;Harry W. Herr;Mark F. Munsell

  • Biomarkers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer.

    Lorne I Budman;Wassim Kassouf;Jordan R Steinberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Yair Lotan
Yair Lotan The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Pierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz University of Montreal
Colin P. Dinney
Colin P. Dinney The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Giacomo Novara
Giacomo Novara University of Padua
Yves Fradet
Yves Fradet Université Laval
Ashish M. Kamat
Ashish M. Kamat The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Jay D. Raman
Jay D. Raman Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Francesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Vincenzo Ficarra
Vincenzo Ficarra University of Messina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens up many alternative and related online degree options. For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid provide a flexible and affordable pathway into this growing field.

Nursing continues to be in high demand, and you can kick-start your journey without standardized admissions testing. Explore nursing schools that don't require teas to find programs that simplify the application process.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, earning a healthcare administration associate degree online can prepare you for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and beyond. Accelerated programs help you complete your studies faster while maintaining flexibility.

Registered nurses (RNs) pursuing career advancement can transition seamlessly into advanced practice roles. rn to np bridge programs offer a direct route from an ADN to an MSN, opening doors to higher earning potential and specialized fields.

Best Scientists Citing Wassim Kassouf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles