World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Giacomo Novara

Giacomo Novara

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
33251
World Ranking
8331
National Ranking
276

Giacomo Novara publications per year

2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 39 publications 2009: 43 publications 2010: 43 publications 2011: 61 publications 2012: 52 publications 2013: 65 publications 2014: 42 publications 2015: 43 publications 2016: 45 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 9 publications
2002 2025

658 publications in total across all disciplines

Giacomo Novara publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giacomo Novara sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 625 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Giacomo Novara D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giacomo Novara sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Giacomo Novara is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy and has an extensive publication record mainly in the field of medicine. Their research spans a range of subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, surgery, urology, oncology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their scientific contributions focus on various topics related to cancer diagnosis and treatment, particularly in urology. The main areas of work include:

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Renal Cell Carcinoma Treatment
  • COVID-19 and Healthcare Impacts
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies

Their recent publications cover important issues in urology and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare delivery. Notable papers include:

  • "Telehealth in Urology: A Systematic Review of the Literature. How Much Can Telemedicine Be Useful During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic?" (2020), published in European Urology
  • "Urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), published in Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica
  • "Traditional and Virtual Congress Meetings During the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Post-COVID-19 Era: Is it Time to Change the Paradigm?" (2020), published in European Urology
  • "Risks from Deferring Treatment for Genitourinary Cancers: A Collaborative Review to Aid Triage and Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2020), published in European Urology
  • "Clinical pathways for urology patients during the COVID-19 pandemic" (2020), published in Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica

Giacomo Novara frequently publishes in several academic venues including European Urology Open Science, European Urology, European Urology Focus, The Journal of Urology, and the Journal of Clinical Medicine.

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their scientific activity. Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Fabrizio Moro
  • Fabio Zattoni
  • Filippo Carletti
  • Alessandro Morlacco
  • Giovanni Betto

Best Publications

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Raymond C. Rosen;Walter Artibani

  • Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Walter Artibani;Andrea Cestari

  • Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) Classification of Renal Tumours in Patients who are Candidates for Nephron-Sparing Surgery

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Silvia Secco;Veronica Macchi

  • Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Potency Rates After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Thomas E. Ahlering;Anthony Costello

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update

    Jean Nicolas Cornu;Sascha Ahyai;Alexander Bachmann;Jean De La Rosette

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

    Giacomo Novara;Vincenzo Ficarra;Raymond C. Rosen;Walter Artibani

  • Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Oncologic Outcome After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

    Giacomo Novara;Vincenzo Ficarra;Simone Mocellin;Thomas E. Ahlering

  • Evidence from Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Stefano Cavalleri;Giacomo Novara;Maurizio Aragona

  • Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy

    Giacomo Novara;James W.F. Catto;Timothy Wilson;Magnus Annerstedt

  • Prognostic factors in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas: a comprehensive review of the current literature.

    Giovanni Lughezzani;Maximilian Burger;Vitaly Margulis;Surena F. Matin

  • Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparative Data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

    Giacomo Novara;Walter Artibani;Matthew D. Barber;Christopher R. Chapple

  • Best Practices in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel

    Francesco Montorsi;Timothy G Wilson;Raymond C Rosen;Thomas E Ahlering

  • A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with Antimuscarinic Drugs for Overactive Bladder

    Giacomo Novara;Antonio Galfano;Silvia Secco;Carolina D'Elia

  • Complication Rates of Tension-Free Midurethral Slings in the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Tension-Free Midurethral Tapes to Other Surgical Procedures and Different Devices

    Giacomo Novara;Antonio Galfano;Rafael Boscolo-Berto;Silvia Secco

  • The role of chronic prostatic inflammation in the pathogenesis and progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

    Giorgio Gandaglia;Alberto Briganti;Paolo Gontero;Nicola Mondaini

  • Complications and Mortality After Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Transitional Cell Cancer

    Giacomo Novara;Vincenzo De Marco;Maurizio Aragona;Rafael Boscolo-Berto

  • Validation of the 2009 TNM Version in a Large Multi-Institutional Cohort of Patients Treated for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Are Further Improvements Needed?

    Giacomo Novara;Vincenzo Ficarra;Alessandro Antonelli;Walter Artibani

  • A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution.

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Simonetta Fracalanza;Carolina D’Elia

  • Contemporary Management of Postprostatectomy Incontinence

    Ricarda M. Bauer;Christian Gozzi;Wilhelm Hübner;Victor W. Nitti

  • Urology practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Vincenzo Ficarra;Giacomo Novara;Alberto Abrate;Riccardo Bartoletti

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincenzo Ficarra
Vincenzo Ficarra University of Messina
Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Pierre I. Karakiewicz
Pierre I. Karakiewicz University of Montreal
Francesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Wassim Kassouf
Wassim Kassouf McGill University
Walter Artibani
Walter Artibani University of Verona
Yair Lotan
Yair Lotan The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Douglas S. Scherr
Douglas S. Scherr Cornell University
Richard Zigeuner
Richard Zigeuner Medical University of Graz
Patrick J. Bastian
Patrick J. Bastian Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore your options for studying Medicine in the USA, it’s worth considering additional online degrees and career pathways in the health sector. These programs can help you advance your expertise or pivot into in-demand healthcare roles.

For those aiming for fast-tracked leadership positions, an accelerated healthcare administration degree online provides a time-efficient route into healthcare management. Professionals with nursing backgrounds might be interested in adn to fnp bridge programs, which are designed to help registered nurses swiftly earn a master’s and qualify as family nurse practitioners.

If you have a passion for wellness and nutrition, pursuing an online nutrition degree can open doors to careers in dietary planning, community health, and research. Additionally, students interested in healthcare management should check which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? to ensure their degree meets high educational standards and is recognized by employers.

Exploring these related programs can provide flexibility and diverse career opportunities in the ever-evolving field of healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Giacomo Novara

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles