World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen A. Boorjian

Stephen A. Boorjian

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 7084 6656 3724 3449 945 37652

Stephen A. Boorjian publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen A. Boorjian between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen A. Boorjian published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 40.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 94 publications in 2017. 129 of the 1,086 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 94. Peak 94 publications in 2017. 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 31 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 25 publications 2011: 49 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 61 publications 2014: 73 publications 2015: 74 publications 2016: 72 publications 2017: 94 publications 2018: 61 publications 2019: 74 publications 2020: 56 publications 2021: 70 publications 2022: 50 publications 2023: 52 publications 2024: 58 publications 2025: 71 publications
1999 2025

1,086 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen A. Boorjian: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 2
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 11
2005 13
2006 11
2007 15
2008 31
2009 21
2010 25
2011 49
2012 39
2013 61
2014 73
2015 74
2016 72
2017 94
2018 61
2019 74
2020 56
2021 70
2022 50
2023 52
2024 58
2025 71
Total 1,086
Download as CSV

Stephen A. Boorjian publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Boorjian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 941–960 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 945 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133 945
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen A. Boorjian D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Boorjian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen A. Boorjian is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly focusing on surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, urology, oncology, and molecular biology. Their research covers a wide array of topics primarily related to cancer treatments and urological disorders.

The scientist's main topics of work include:

  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Renal and related cancers

Stephen A. Boorjian's frequently published venues include:

  • The Journal of Urology
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • European Urology
  • Urology

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Stephen A. Boorjian in publications are:

  • Bradley C. Leibovich
  • Matthew K. Tollefson
  • R. Houston Thompson
  • John C. Cheville
  • Abhinav Khanna

Among their significant recent papers are:

  • Bladder Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2020, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • Intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec gene therapy for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a single-arm, open-label, repeat-dose clinical trial, 2020, The Lancet Oncology
  • Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part I: Introduction, Risk Assessment, Staging, and Risk-Based Management, 2022, The Journal of Urology
  • NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Bladder Cancer, Version 2.2022, 2022, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part II: Principles of Active Surveillance, Principles of Surgery, and Follow-Up, 2022, The Journal of Urology

The published works reflect ongoing research interest in bladder and prostate cancer treatment methods, clinical guidelines, and oncological surgery protocols. The number of citations for these publications ranges from over 200 to more than 600, indicating engagement with prominent oncology guidelines and clinical trials.

With a total of 685 publications categorized under medicine and notable contributions in surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and molecular biology, Stephen A. Boorjian's research spans both clinical and biological aspects of cancer and urological disorders.

Best Publications

  • Epidemiology of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

    Umberto Capitanio;Karim Bensalah;Axel Bex;Stephen A. Boorjian

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline

    Sam S. Chang;Stephen A. Boorjian;Roger Chou;Peter E. Clark

  • Radical Nephrectomy for pT1a Renal Masses May be Associated With Decreased Overall Survival Compared With Partial Nephrectomy

    R. Houston Thompson;Stephen A. Boorjian;Christine M. Lohse;Bradley C. Leibovich

  • Gender and Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Review of Etiology, Biology, and Outcomes

    Jakub Dobruch;Siamak Daneshmand;Margit Fisch;Yair Lotan

  • SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE OF PEYRONIE’S DISEASE IN A POPULATION OF MEN PRESENTING FOR PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING

    John P. Mulhall;Steven D. Creech;Stephen A. Boorjian;Sam Ghaly

  • Comparative Effectiveness for Survival and Renal Function of Partial and Radical Nephrectomy for Localized Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Simon P. Kim;R. Houston Thompson;Stephen A. Boorjian;Christopher J. Weight

  • Histological Subtype is an Independent Predictor of Outcome for Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma

    Bradley C. Leibovich;Christine M. Lohse;Paul L. Crispen;Stephen A. Boorjian

  • Survival after complete surgical resection of multiple metastases from renal cell carcinoma

    Angela L. Alt;Stephen A. Boorjian;Christine M. Lohse;Brian A. Costello

  • Comparison of Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Ablation for cT1 Renal Masses

    R. Houston Thompson;Tom Atwell;Grant Schmit;Christine M. Lohse

  • Long-Term Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Lymph Node Positive Prostate Cancer in the Prostate Specific Antigen Era

    Stephen A. Boorjian;R. Houston Thompson;Sameer Siddiqui;Stephanie Bagniewski

  • Long-Term Risk of Clinical Progression After Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy: The Impact of Time from Surgery to Recurrence

    Stephen A. Boorjian;R. Houston Thompson;Matthew K. Tollefson;Laureano J. Rangel

  • Comparison of cold and warm ischemia during partial nephrectomy in 660 solitary kidneys reveals predominant role of nonmodifiable factors in determining ultimate renal function.

    Brian R. Lane;Brian R. Lane;Paul Russo;Robert G. Uzzo;Adrian V. Hernandez

  • Tumor cell and tumor vasculature expression of B7-H3 predict survival in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

    Paul L. Crispen;Yuri Sheinin;Timothy J. Roth;Christine M. Lohse

  • T-cell coregulatory molecule expression in urothelial cell carcinoma: clinicopathologic correlations and association with survival.

    Stephen A. Boorjian;Yuri Sheinin;Paul L. Crispen;Sara A. Farmer

  • Bladder cancer, version 5.2017: Clinical practice guidelines in oncology

    Philippe E. Spiess;Neeraj Agarwal;Rick Bangs;Stephen A. Boorjian

  • Accelerated Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin Is Safe, Effective, and Efficient Neoadjuvant Treatment for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Phase II Study With Molecular Correlates of Response and Toxicity

    Elizabeth R. Plimack;Jean H. Hoffman-Censits;Rosalia Viterbo;Edouard J. Trabulsi

  • Long-Term Survival After Radical Prostatectomy Versus External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer

    Stephen A. Boorjian;R. Jeffrey Karnes;Rosalia Viterbo;Laureano J. Rangel

  • Anatomic Features of Enhancing Renal Masses Predict Malignant and High-Grade Pathology: A Preoperative Nomogram Using the RENAL Nephrometry Score

    Alexander Kutikov;Marc C. Smaldone;Brian L. Egleston;Brandon J. Manley

  • Sarcopenia in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy: Impact on cancer‐specific and all‐cause mortality

    Sarah P. Psutka;Alonso Carrasco;Grant D. Schmit;Michael R. Moynagh

  • Mayo Clinic Validation of the D’Amico Risk Group Classification for Predicting Survival Following Radical Prostatectomy

    Stephen A Boorjian;R Jeffrey Karnes;Laureano J Rangel;Eric J Bergstralh

Frequent Co-Authors

John C. Cheville
John C. Cheville Mayo Clinic
Shahrokh F. Shariat
Shahrokh F. Shariat Medical University of Vienna
Michael L. Blute
Michael L. Blute Harvard University
Alberto Briganti
Alberto Briganti Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Robert G. Uzzo
Robert G. Uzzo Fox Chase Cancer Center
Francesco Montorsi
Francesco Montorsi Vita-Salute San Raffaele University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine doesn't always mean going to medical school. There are multiple related pathways that offer rewarding careers in healthcare. For those interested in the administrative side, options like accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid provide flexible, affordable training for in-demand roles.

If you’re considering nursing, there are now nursing school that don't require teas, making it easier to get started without extensive entrance exams. For those seeking leadership, healthcare administration degrees can open doors to managing hospitals, clinics, or other healthcare facilities.

Already a registered nurse? Explore rn to fnp programs to advance your education and become a Family Nurse Practitioner. Online programs offer the flexibility to study while you work, and many of these alternative degree pathways provide a fast track into some of healthcare’s most vital roles.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen A. Boorjian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles