What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Mineral
- Sedimentary rock
- Geochemistry
His primary areas of investigation include Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Hydrothermal circulation, Pyrite and Porphyry copper deposit.
His Geochemistry research incorporates themes from Fluid inclusions and Copper.
His Mineralogy research incorporates themes from Structural basin, Mineral, Paleozoic, Sedimentary rock and Meteoric water.
His Hydrothermal circulation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Mass spectrometry, EMPA, Electron microprobe, Analytical chemistry and Sulfide.
His studies in Pyrite integrate themes in fields like Nanoparticle, Carlin–type gold deposit, Sulfur and Arsenic.
His Porphyry copper deposit research integrates issues from Chalcopyrite and Bornite.
His most cited work include:
- Solubility of gold in arsenian pyrite (426 citations)
- Global lithium resources: Relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits (317 citations)
- Global Lithium Availability: A Constraint for Electric Vehicles (306 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Mineralization, Pyrite and Hydrothermal circulation.
The concepts of his Geochemistry study are interwoven with issues in Porphyry copper deposit and Tectonics.
His studies deal with areas such as Sulfur, Mineral, Sulfide, Carbonate and Fluid inclusions as well as Mineralogy.
As part of one scientific family, Stephen E. Kesler deals mainly with the area of Mineralization, narrowing it down to issues related to the Ordovician, and often Paleozoic.
The study incorporates disciplines such as EMPA, Electron microprobe, High-resolution transmission electron microscopy, Arsenic and Carlin–type gold deposit in addition to Pyrite.
As part of his studies on Hydrothermal circulation, Stephen E. Kesler frequently links adjacent subjects like Analytical chemistry.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (63.21%)
- Mineralogy (40.41%)
- Mineralization (21.76%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2007-2019)?
- Geochemistry (63.21%)
- Pyrite (21.76%)
- Mineralogy (40.41%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Geochemistry, Pyrite, Mineralogy, Hydrothermal circulation and EMPA are his primary areas of study.
His Geochemistry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Tectonics, Magmatism and Source rock.
The Sphalerite research Stephen E. Kesler does as part of his general Pyrite study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Solubility, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
His Mineralogy study combines topics in areas such as Sulfide, Mineral and Copper.
His research in the fields of Fluid inclusions overlaps with other disciplines such as Crystal.
His EMPA study incorporates themes from Argillic alteration, Vein, Paragenesis and Zirconium.
Between 2007 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Global lithium resources: Relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits (317 citations)
- Global Lithium Availability: A Constraint for Electric Vehicles (306 citations)
- Trace metal nanoparticles in pyrite (204 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Mineral
- Sedimentary rock
- Paleontology
His scientific interests lie mostly in Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Hydrothermal circulation, Pyrite and Natural resource economics.
In his work, Erosion and Porphyry copper deposit is strongly intertwined with Tectonics, which is a subfield of Geochemistry.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Mineral and Copper.
Stephen E. Kesler has included themes like Sulfide and EMPA in his Hydrothermal circulation study.
Stephen E. Kesler combines subjects such as Electron microprobe and High-resolution transmission electron microscopy with his study of Pyrite.
The various areas that Stephen E. Kesler examines in his Natural resource economics study include Lead and Mineral resource classification.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
