| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 35 | 11572 | 11241 | 4754 | 4549 | 91 | 6284 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Peter F. Corbett between 1964 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter F. Corbett published across 60 years, from 1964 to 2023, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2005. 1 of the 104 publications appeared in the last two years.
104 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1964 | 1 |
| 1965 | 0 |
| 1966 | 0 |
| 1967 | 0 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0 |
| 1971 | 0 |
| 1972 | 0 |
| 1973 | 0 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0 |
| 1982 | 0 |
| 1983 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0 |
| 1985 | 0 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 1 |
| 1988 | 4 |
| 1989 | 7 |
| 1990 | 7 |
| 1991 | 3 |
| 1992 | 3 |
| 1993 | 2 |
| 1994 | 3 |
| 1995 | 5 |
| 1996 | 5 |
| 1997 | 1 |
| 1998 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0 |
| 2000 | 1 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 4 |
| 2003 | 8 |
| 2004 | 6 |
| 2005 | 10 |
| 2006 | 5 |
| 2007 | 6 |
| 2008 | 4 |
| 2009 | 3 |
| 2010 | 2 |
| 2011 | 1 |
| 2012 | 2 |
| 2013 | 3 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 1 |
| 2017 | 1 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 1 |
| Total | 104 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. Corbett sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 91 publications — 6th percentile
6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 32–41 | 7 | |
| 42–51 | 22 | |
| 52–61 | 82 | |
| 62–71 | 134 | |
| 72–81 | 249 | |
| 82–91 | 324 | 91 |
| 92–101 | 421 | |
| 102–111 | 420 | |
| 112–121 | 497 | |
| 122–131 | 544 | |
| 132–141 | 555 | |
| 142–151 | 609 | |
| 152–161 | 559 | |
| 162–171 | 534 | |
| 172–181 | 556 | |
| 182–191 | 583 | |
| 192–201 | 519 | |
| 202–211 | 508 | |
| 212–221 | 490 | |
| 222–231 | 437 | |
| 232–241 | 423 | |
| 242–251 | 408 | |
| 252–261 | 377 | |
| 262–271 | 301 | |
| 272–281 | 335 | |
| 282–291 | 320 | |
| 292–301 | 293 | |
| 302–311 | 250 | |
| 312–321 | 238 | |
| 322–331 | 206 | |
| 332–341 | 209 | |
| 342–351 | 208 | |
| 352–361 | 162 | |
| 362–371 | 176 | |
| 372–381 | 127 | |
| 382–391 | 158 | |
| 392–401 | 128 | |
| 402–411 | 104 | |
| 412–421 | 94 | |
| 422–431 | 99 | |
| 432–441 | 83 | |
| 442–451 | 108 | |
| 452–461 | 73 | |
| 462–471 | 77 | |
| 472–481 | 69 | |
| 482–491 | 84 | |
| 492–501 | 62 | |
| 502–511 | 54 | |
| 512–521 | 57 | |
| 522–531 | 51 | |
| 532–541 | 51 | |
| 542–551 | 32 | |
| 552–561 | 38 | |
| 562–571 | 28 | |
| 572–581 | 43 | |
| 582–591 | 33 | |
| 592–601 | 41 | |
| 602–611 | 32 | |
| 612–621 | 28 | |
| 622–631 | 25 | |
| 632–641 | 27 | |
| 642–651 | 17 | |
| 652–661 | 20 | |
| 662–671 | 17 | |
| 672–681 | 15 | |
| 682–691 | 14 | |
| 692–701 | 21 | |
| 702–711 | 13 | |
| 712–721 | 12 | |
| 722–731 | 19 | |
| 732–741 | 14 | |
| 742–751 | 12 | |
| 752–761 | 10 | |
| 762–771 | 10 | |
| 772–781 | 11 | |
| 782–791 | 10 | |
| 792–801 | 11 | |
| 802–811 | 8 | |
| 812–821 | 8 | |
| 822–831 | 7 | |
| 832–841 | 11 | |
| 842–851 | 10 | |
| 852–861 | 5 | |
| 862–871 | 9 | |
| 872–881 | 4 | |
| 882–891 | 6 | |
| 892–901 | 3 | |
| 902–911 | 6 | |
| 912–921 | 3 | |
| 922–931 | 2 | |
| 932–941 | 2 | |
| 942–951 | 2 | |
| 952–961 | 3 | |
| 962–971 | 3 | |
| 972–981 | 3 | |
| 982–990 | 5 | |
| 991+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter F. Corbett sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile
20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30–31 | 879 | |
| 32–33 | 983 | |
| 34–35 | 918 | 35 |
| 36–37 | 990 | |
| 38–39 | 968 | |
| 40–41 | 907 | |
| 42–43 | 821 | |
| 44–45 | 763 | |
| 46–47 | 689 | |
| 48–49 | 543 | |
| 50–51 | 543 | |
| 52–53 | 518 | |
| 54–55 | 500 | |
| 56–57 | 458 | |
| 58–59 | 400 | |
| 60–61 | 337 | |
| 62–63 | 308 | |
| 64–65 | 292 | |
| 66–67 | 249 | |
| 68–69 | 213 | |
| 70–71 | 192 | |
| 72–73 | 189 | |
| 74–75 | 165 | |
| 76–77 | 139 | |
| 78–79 | 119 | |
| 80–81 | 121 | |
| 82–83 | 113 | |
| 84–85 | 88 | |
| 86–87 | 87 | |
| 88–89 | 75 | |
| 90–91 | 69 | |
| 92–93 | 57 | |
| 94–95 | 46 | |
| 96–97 | 38 | |
| 98–99 | 34 | |
| 100–101 | 36 | |
| 102–103 | 27 | |
| 104–105 | 37 | |
| 106–107 | 18 | |
| 108–109 | 31 | |
| 110–111 | 19 | |
| 112–113 | 16 | |
| 114–115 | 12 | |
| 116–117 | 20 | |
| 118–119 | 15 | |
| 120–121 | 5 | |
| 122–123 | 20 | |
| 124–125 | 8 | |
| 126–127 | 5 | |
| 128–129 | 7 | |
| 130 | 3 | |
| 131+ | 98 |
Peter F. Corbett;Robert M. English;Steven R. Kleiman
Peter Corbett;Bob English;Atul Goel;Tomislav Grcanac
Peter F. Corbett;Dror G. Feitelson
John K. Edwards;Blake H. Lewis;Robert M. English;Eric Hamilton
D. G. Feitelson;P. F. Corbett;J.-P. Prost;S. J. Baylor
Steven C Miller;Peter F. Corbett
Peter Corbett;Dror Feitelson;Sam Fineberg;Yarsun Hsu
P.F. Corbett
R. Hartley;P. Corbett
Peter F. Corbett;Steven R. Kleiman;Robert M. English
P. F. Corbett;D. G. Feltelson;J.-P. Prost;G. S. Almasi
Steven R. Kleiman;Robert M. English;Peter F. Corbett
Richard P. Jernigan;Allen Tracht;Peter F. Corbett
Peter F. Corbett;Sandra Johnson Baylor;Dror G. Feitelson
Baylor Sandra Johnson;Corbett Peter Frank;Park Chan-Ik
Peter Corbett;Bob English;Atul Goel;Tomislav Grcanac
Faramarz Rabii;Hooman Vassef;Peter Corbett;Keith Arner
P.F. Corbett;D.G. Feitelson
Robert M. English;Peter F. Corbett;Steven R. Kleiman
Peter F. Corbett;Robert M. English;Steven R. Kleiman
Peter Corbett;Dror Feitelson;Sam Fineberg;Yarsun Hsut
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and interconnected career paths. Many students expand their skill set by considering related technical disciplines offered by reputable U.S. universities.
For those seeking a strong foundation in innovation and problem-solving, the online mechanical engineering degree can complement your computer science studies, especially if you're interested in robotics or hardware systems. Similarly, pursuing an online electrical engineering degree ranking can help you identify quality programs focused on embedded systems, circuits, and microprocessors.
Students interested in developing analytical skills might consider a online physics bachelor's degree, which sharpens your mathematical and critical thinking abilities—valuable in software and research roles. The growing field of data analysis also makes a data science degree highly relevant for those aiming at careers in AI, analytics, or big data.
These related online programs allow you to customize your education, increase versatility, and enhance your employability within the tech industry.
The Ohio State University
University of British Columbia
Polytechnic University of Turin
University of Canterbury
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Queensland University of Technology
McMaster University
University of Cologne
University of Duisburg-Essen
University of Washington
Dalhousie University
Scripps Research Institute
University of Naples Federico II
University of Edinburgh
Tokyo Medical University
Arizona State University