World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
7247
World Ranking
6924
National Ranking
61

Chanik Park publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chanik Park sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 186 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Chanik Park D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chanik Park sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chanik Park is affiliated with the Pohang University of Science and Technology in South Korea and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, and Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans several subfields including Cultural Studies and Visual Arts and Performing Arts.

The main topics covered in their work include Blockchain Technology Applications and Security, Distributed Systems and Fault Tolerance, Caching and Content Delivery, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Educational Systems and Policies, Cultural and Historical Studies, and Asian Culture and Media Studies.

The scientist has published papers in notable venues such as IEEE Access, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, and the 2022 13th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). Other publication venues include KIISE Transactions on Computing Practices and Journal of Digital Convergence.

Frequent coauthors of Chanik Park are Yongrae Jo, Woochang Jeong, Unsung Lee, Jeonghyeon Ma, and Moonhyeon Chung.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Chanik Park include:

  • A Study on the Development Direction of New Media Art Using Virtual Reality, 2020, Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society
  • SofTEE: Software-Based Trusted Execution Environment for User Applications, 2020, IEEE Access
  • PeerBFT: Making Hyperledger Fabric's Ordering Service Withstand Byzantine Faults, 2020, IEEE Access
  • Parallel Execution of Solidity Smart Contract using Append-only Shared Log, 2022, 2022 13th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC)
  • A Blockchain Sharding Protocol supporting Dynamic Locality in Mobile Edge Computing, 2022, 2022 13th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC)

Best Publications

  • A case for flash memory ssd in enterprise database applications

    Sang-Won Lee;Bongki Moon;Chanik Park;Jae-Myung Kim

  • An optimal scheduling algorithm based on task duplication

    Chan-Ik Park;Tae-Young Choe

  • Solid state memory (ssm), computer system including an ssm, and method of operating an ssm

    Moon-wook Oh;Do-Geun Kim;Chan-ik Park

  • A reconfigurable FTL (flash translation layer) architecture for NAND flash-based applications

    Chanik Park;Wonmoon Cheon;Jeonguk Kang;Kangho Roh

  • A Re-configurable FTL (Flash Translation Layer) Architecture for NAND Flash based Applications

    Chanik Park;Wonmoon Cheon;Yangsup Lee;Myoung-Soo Jung

  • Query processing on smart SSDs: opportunities and challenges

    Jaeyoung Do;Yang-Suk Kee;Jignesh M. Patel;Chanik Park

  • Flash memory device with multi-level cells and method of performing operations therein according to a detected writing patter

    Cheon Won Moon;Kim Seon Taek;Park Chan Ik;Choi Sung Up

  • A multi-channel architecture for high-performance NAND flash-based storage system

    Jeong-Uk Kang;Jin-Soo Kim;Chanik Park;Hyoungjun Park

  • A High Performance Controller for NAND Flash-based Solid State Disk (NSSD)

    Chanik Park;P. Talawar;Daeski Won;MyungJin Jung

  • COMPUTING SYSTEM BASED ON CHARACTERISTCS OF FLASH STORAGE

    Park Chan Ik

  • Advances in flash memory SSD technology for enterprise database applications

    Sang-Won Lee;Bongki Moon;Chanik Park

  • Enabling cost-effective data processing with smart SSD

    Yangwook Kang;Yang-suk Kee;Ethan L. Miller;Chanik Park

  • Memory system and method of accessing a semiconductor memory device

    Jaesoo Lee;Kangho Roh;Wonhee Cho;Hojun Shim

  • Active disk meets flash: a case for intelligent SSDs

    Sangyeun Cho;Chanik Park;Hyunok Oh;Sungchan Kim

  • Energy-aware demand paging on NAND flash-based embedded storages

    Chanik Park;Jeong-Uk Kang;Seon-Yeong Park;Jin-Soo Kim

  • Variability in the execution of multimedia applications and implications for architecture

    Christopher J. Hughes;Praful Kaul;Sarita V. Adve;Rohit Jain

  • Storage device and user device including the same

    Donghyun Song;Chanik Park;Sang Lyul Min;Sheayun Lee

  • METHOD FOR PROTECTING DATA AGAINST DOUBLE STORAGE DEVICE FAILURES IN THE SYSTEM HAVING MULTIPLE STORAGE DEVICES

    Baylor Sandra Johnson;Corbett Peter Frank;Park Chan-Ik

  • Device and method for controllintg proper execution in serial flash memory and corresponding chip

    Jae-Min Lim;Chan-Ic Park;Jae-Wu Seo

  • A method of wearing-leveling memory device and memory system

    Lee Yang-Sup;Park Chan-Ik;Cheon Won-Moon

  • Query Processing on Smart SSDs.

    Kwanghyun Park;Yang-Suk Kee;Jignesh M. Patel;Jaeyoung Do

  • Striping in Disk Array RM2 Enabling the Tolerance of Double Disk Failures

    Chan-Ik Park;Tae-Young Choe

Frequent Co-Authors

Sang Lyul Min
Sang Lyul Min Seoul National University
Jin-Soo Kim
Jin-Soo Kim Seoul National University
Bongki Moon
Bongki Moon Seoul National University
Peter F. Corbett
Peter F. Corbett IBM (United States)
Soonhoi Ha
Soonhoi Ha Seoul National University
Jignesh M. Patel
Jignesh M. Patel Carnegie Mellon University
David J. DeWitt
David J. DeWitt University of Wisconsin–Madison
Naehyuck Chang
Naehyuck Chang Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Gregory R. Ganger
Gregory R. Ganger Carnegie Mellon University
Ki-Tae Park
Ki-Tae Park Samsung (South Korea)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring pathways beyond a traditional Computer Science degree opens a range of flexible and rewarding options. Many students look at accredited online electrical engineering programs as a valuable technical alternative that can complement software skills while offering robust career prospects in diverse industries.

For those seeking quicker entry into the tech job market, there are 3-month certificate programs that pay well—an efficient way to upskill and secure roles in high-demand areas like IT support or cybersecurity.

If advancing your education is the goal, consider shortest masters degree programs online. These programs can help you gain specialized knowledge—and a competitive advantage—in as little as one year, while balancing work or personal commitments.

Finally, for long-term career growth, it’s important to choose graduate degrees that are worth it. Focusing on fields in demand ensures your degree delivers both personal fulfillment and strong job prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Chanik Park

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles