World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
55
Citations
14021
World Ranking
11980
National Ranking
3216

Evan T. Powers publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evan T. Powers sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 118 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Evan T. Powers D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evan T. Powers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

Evan T. Powers is affiliated with the Scripps Research Institute in the United States. Their research spans several fields within biology and medicine, with a focus on biochemical and molecular biological processes related to disease mechanisms.

The main fields of study covered by their work include Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Within these broader fields, their subfields of study are Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Physiology, Epidemiology, and Genetics.

The topics frequently addressed by their research encompass a range of biological and medical concerns:

  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
  • Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Evan T. Powers has contributed to publications in a number of scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Amyloid
  • Cardiology and Therapy
  • Nature Chemical Biology
  • Nature Communications

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on cellular stress responses, protein homeostasis, and cellular remodeling mechanisms. Selected recent publications are:

  • "Pharmacologic IRE1/XBP1s activation confers targeted ER proteostasis reprogramming," 2020, Nature Chemical Biology
  • "Pharmacologic IRE1/XBP1s activation promotes systemic adaptive remodeling in obesity," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Defining the Functional Targets of Cap'n'collar Transcription Factors NRF1, NRF2, and NRF3," 2020, Antioxidants
  • "ATF6 is essential for human cone photoreceptor development," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Blinded potency comparison of transthyretin kinetic stabilisers by subunit exchange in human plasma," 2020, Amyloid

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Jeffery W. Kelly
  • R. Luke Wiseman
  • Julia M. D. Grandjean
  • Gabriel M. Kline
  • Karina Nugroho

Best Publications

  • Biological and Chemical Approaches to Diseases of Proteostasis Deficiency

    Evan T. Powers;Richard I. Morimoto;Andrew Dillin;Jeffery W. Kelly

  • Tafamidis, a potent and selective transthyretin kinetic stabilizer that inhibits the amyloid cascade

    Christine E. Bulawa;Stephen Connelly;Michael DeVit;Lan Wang

  • Aβ induces astrocytic glutamate release, extrasynaptic NMDA receptor activation, and synaptic loss

    Maria Talantova;Sara Sanz-Blasco;Xiaofei Zhang;Peng Xia

  • Prevention of Transthyretin Amyloid Disease by Changing Protein Misfolding Energetics

    Per Hammarström;R. Luke Wiseman;Evan T. Powers;Jeffery W. Kelly

  • Targeting protein aggregation for the treatment of degenerative diseases.

    Yvonne S. Eisele;Cecilia Monteiro;Colleen Fearns;Sandra E. Encalada

  • Amyloid-β forms fibrils by nucleated conformational conversion of oligomers

    Jiyong Lee;Elizabeth K Culyba;Evan T Powers;Jeffery W Kelly

  • Sequence-dependent denaturation energetics: A major determinant in amyloid disease diversity.

    Per Hammarström;Xin Jiang;Amy R Hurshman;Evan T Powers

  • Transthyretin aggregation under partially denaturing conditions is a downhill polymerization.

    Amy R Hurshman;Joleen T White;Evan T Powers;Jeffery W Kelly

  • Elevated levels of oxidized cholesterol metabolites in Lewy body disease brains accelerate alpha-synuclein fibrilization.

    Daryl A Bosco;Douglas M Fowler;Qinghai Zhang;Jorge Nieva

  • The transthyretin amyloidoses: from delineating the molecular mechanism of aggregation linked to pathology to a regulatory-agency-approved drug.

    Steven M. Johnson;Stephen Connelly;Colleen Fearns;Evan T. Powers

  • Context-dependent contributions of backbone hydrogen bonding to β-sheet folding energetics

    Songpon Deechongkit;Houbi Nguyen;Evan T. Powers;Philip E. Dawson

  • "Inverse Drug Discovery" Strategy To Identify Proteins That Are Targeted by Latent Electrophiles As Exemplified by Aryl Fluorosulfates.

    David E. Mortenson;Gabriel J. Brighty;Lars Plate;Grant Bare

  • Benzoxazoles as Transthyretin Amyloid Fibril Inhibitors: Synthesis, Evaluation, and Mechanism of Action†

    Hossein Razavi;Satheesh K. Palaninathan;Evan T. Powers;R. Luke Wiseman

  • Diversity in the origins of proteostasis networks--a driver for protein function in evolution.

    Evan T. Powers;William E. Balch

  • Arylfluorosulfates Inactivate Intracellular Lipid Binding Protein(s) through Chemoselective SuFEx Reaction with a Binding Site Tyr Residue

    Wentao Chen;Jiajia Dong;Lars Plate;David E. Mortenson

  • The core trisaccharide of an N-linked glycoprotein intrinsically accelerates folding and enhances stability

    Sarah R. Hanson;Elizabeth K. Culyba;Tsui-Ling Hsu;Chi-Huey Wong

  • ALS Mutants of Human Superoxide Dismutase Form Fibrous Aggregates Via Framework Destabilization

    Michael DiDonato;Lisa Craig;Mary E. Huff;Maria M. Thayer

  • Metabolite-initiated protein misfolding may trigger Alzheimer's disease

    Qinghai Zhang;Evan T. Powers;Jorge Nieva;Mary E. Huff

  • The Kinetics of Nucleated Polymerizations at High Concentrations: Amyloid Fibril Formation Near and Above the “Supercritical Concentration”

    Evan T. Powers;David L. Powers

  • Localized thermodynamic coupling between hydrogen bonding and microenvironment polarity substantially stabilizes proteins.

    Jianmin Gao;Daryl A Bosco;Evan T Powers;Jeffery W Kelly

  • Small molecule proteostasis regulators that reprogram the ER to reduce extracellular protein aggregation.

    Lars Plate;Christina B Cooley;John J Chen;Ryan J Paxman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffery W. Kelly
Jeffery W. Kelly Scripps Research Institute
Ian A. Wilson
Ian A. Wilson Scripps Research Institute
William E. Balch
William E. Balch Scripps Health
Chi-Huey Wong
Chi-Huey Wong Scripps Research Institute
Martin Gruebele
Martin Gruebele University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Richard A. Lerner
Richard A. Lerner Scripps Research Institute
Richard I. Morimoto
Richard I. Morimoto Northwestern University
Lila M. Gierasch
Lila M. Gierasch University of Massachusetts Amherst
Benjamin F. Cravatt
Benjamin F. Cravatt Scripps Research Institute
Jerrold Meinwald
Jerrold Meinwald Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. For instance, a master's in forensic psychology online combines scientific knowledge with legal applications, ideal for those fascinated by the intersection of chemistry and human behavior.

Careers in forensic science offer another compelling path, making use of chemical analysis techniques to solve crimes. Exploring careers in forensic science can help students understand roles that involve criminal investigations, laboratory work, and evidence interpretation.

Many of these careers require formal education in criminal justice fields. Considering the financial investment is crucial; resources covering criminal justice degree price provide valuable insights into tuition and fees, helping students plan their education effectively.

Starting with foundational programs is another option. Online offerings like criminal justice associate programs online provide accessible entry points into the field, facilitating career growth in related scientific and investigative domains.

Best Scientists Citing Evan T. Powers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles