World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8104 7564 367 354 189 9660

Paul Jansen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Jansen between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Jansen published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2013. 10 of the 379 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2013. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 10 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 5 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 7 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 16 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1981 2025

379 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Jansen: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 3
1983 3
1984 10
1985 1
1986 5
1987 2
1988 4
1989 2
1990 0
1991 2
1992 1
1993 7
1994 10
1995 6
1996 7
1997 16
1998 12
1999 9
2000 14
2001 16
2002 6
2003 8
2004 10
2005 17
2006 9
2007 6
2008 7
2009 9
2010 16
2011 11
2012 14
2013 23
2014 10
2015 18
2016 10
2017 10
2018 12
2019 9
2020 10
2021 9
2022 10
2023 4
2024 5
2025 5
Total 379
Download as CSV

Paul Jansen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Jansen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 189
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Jansen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Jansen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Paul Jansen is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research focuses primarily within the social sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as organizational behavior and human resource management, sociology and political science, general health professions, demography, and social psychology.

The main topics addressed in Jansen's work include:

  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Higher Education and Employability

Jansen has contributed research published in a variety of academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Tijdschrift voor HRM
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Work Aging and Retirement

Their recent papers reflect a diverse range of subjects related to career sustainability, leadership, and emotional demands in the workplace. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Organizing School-to-Work Transition Research from a Sustainable Career Perspective: A Review and Research Agenda" (2023), published in Work Aging and Retirement
  • "Toward a sustainable career perspective on contingent work: a critical review and a research agenda" (2022), published in Career Development International
  • "Unravelling leadership potential: conceptual and measurement issues" (2020), published in European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • "The cognitive costs of managing emotions: A systematic review of the impact of emotional requirements on cognitive performance" (2020), published in Work & Stress
  • "Person-job fit across the work lifespan - The case of classical ballet dancers" (2020), published in Journal of Vocational Behavior

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jansen include Jos Akkermans, Svetlana N. Khapova, Jana Retkowsky, Omar Solinger, and Sanne Nijs. These collaborations indicate a strong network within the fields of career development, organizational behavior, and human resource management.

Best Publications

  • Age and work‐related motives: Results of a meta‐analysis

    Dorien T. A. M. Kooij;Annet H. De Lange;Paul G. W. Jansen;Ruth Kanfer

  • Older workers' motivation to continue to work: Five meanings of age: A conceptual review.

    Dorien Kooij;Annet de Lange;Paul Jansen;Josje Dikkers;Josje Dikkers

  • Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta-analysis of age as a moderator

    P. Matthijs Bal;Annet H. De lange;Paul G. W. Jansen;Mandy E. G. Van der Velde

  • The influence of age on the associations between HR practices and both affective commitment and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis

    Dorien T. A. M. Kooij;Paul G. W. Jansen;Josje S. E. Dikkers;Annet H. de lange

  • Autonomy as a start-up motive

    Marco van Gelderen;Paul Jansen

  • How the impact of HR practices on employee well-being and performance changes with age

    Dorien T.A.M. Kooij;David E. Guest;Mike Clinton;Terry Knight

  • Motivating Employees to Work Beyond Retirement: A Multi-Level Study of the Role of I-Deals and Unit Climate

    P. Matthijs Bal;Simon B. De Jong;Paul G. W. Jansen;Arnold B. Bakker

  • Psychological contract breach and work performance: Is social exchange a buffer or an intensifier?

    P. Matthijs Bal;Dan S. Chiaburu;Paul G.W. Jansen

  • Building a sustainable start: The role of career competencies, career success, and career shocks in young professionals' employability

    Rowena Blokker;Jos Akkermans;Maria Tims;Paul Jansen

  • Managing aging workers: a mixed methods study on bundles of HR practices for aging workers

    Dorien T. A. M. Kooij;Paul G. W. Jansen;Josje S. E. Dikkers;Annet H. de Lange

  • The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: A study among older workers

    P. Matthijs Bal;Paul G. W. Jansen;Mandy E. G. van der Velde;Annet H. de Lange

  • Bouncing back from psychological contract breach: How commitment recovers over time.

    Omar N. Solinger;Joeri Hofmans;P. Matthijs Bal;Paul G. W. Jansen

  • Learning opportunities and learning behaviours of small business starters : Relations with goal achievement, skill development, and satisfaction

    Marco Van Gelderen;Lidewey Van der Sluis;Paul Jansen

  • Career competencies and job crafting: How proactive employees influence their well-being

    Judith Plomp;Maria Tims;Jos Akkermans;Svetlana N. Khapova

  • On the relationships among work characteristics and learning-related behavior: Does age matter?

    Annet H. De Lange;Toon W. Taris;Toon W. Taris;Paul Jansen;Michiel A. J. Kompier

  • A stringent limit on a drifting proton-to-electron mass ratio from alcohol in the early universe.

    Julija Bagdonaite;Paul Jansen;Christian Henkel;Christian Henkel;Hendrick L. Bethlem

  • Proactivity, job characteristics, and engagement: a longitudinal study

    Josje S.E. Dikkers;Paul G.W. Jansen;Annet H. de Lange;Claartje J. Vinkenburg

  • Beyond chronological age. Examining perceived future time and subjective health as age-related mediators in relation to work-related motivations and well-being

    T.A.M. Kooij;A.H. de Lange;P.G.W. Jansen;J.S.E. Dikkers

  • Age as a factor in the relation between work and mental health: Results of the longitudinal TAS survey

    A.H. De Lange;T.W. Taris;P.G W Jansen;P. Smulders

  • Age and Trust as Moderators in the Relation between Procedural Justice and Turnover: A Large-Scale Longitudinal Study

    P. Matthijs Bal;Annet H. de Lange;Jan F. Ybema;Paul G. W. Jansen

  • Psychological contract breach and work performance: Is social exchange a buffer or an intensifier?

    P.M. Bal;D.S. Chiaburu;P.G.W. Jansen

  • Older workers motivation to continue to work: five meanings of age: A conceptual review

    Dorien Kooij;Annet de Lange;Paul Jansen

Frequent Co-Authors

Annet H. de Lange
Annet H. de Lange Open University in the Netherlands
P. Matthijs Bal
P. Matthijs Bal University of Lincoln
Svetlana N. Khapova
Svetlana N. Khapova Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jaap Paauwe
Jaap Paauwe Tilburg University
Toon W. Taris
Toon W. Taris Utrecht University
Maria Tims
Maria Tims Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
F. Matthias Bickelhaupt
F. Matthias Bickelhaupt Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Paul Boselie
Paul Boselie Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens doors to a range of rewarding careers in mental health, social work, counseling, and human services. Many students interested in psychology also explore related fields, such as social work, for their strong overlap in supporting individuals and communities. Today, online degrees in these fields provide flexible pathways for students balancing education, work, and other commitments.

Affordability is a key concern for prospective students. If you're looking for cost-effective options, consider exploring affordable social work programs in Atlanta or affordable social work programs in Arizona to find programs that fit your budget.

Those interested in pursuing social work degrees in other regions can research the most affordable social work degree programs in Boston or the most affordable social work degree programs in California.

By considering program flexibility, regional opportunities, and tuition costs, students can find a pathway that supports both their academic and career goals in psychology and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Jansen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles