World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8066 7528 365 352 97 11871

Annet H. de Lange publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Annet H. de Lange between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Annet H. de Lange published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2015. 7 of the 129 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2015. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 5 publications
2002 2025

129 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Annet H. de Lange: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 5
2009 5
2010 7
2011 7
2012 3
2013 8
2014 5
2015 16
2016 13
2017 4
2018 6
2019 9
2020 12
2021 9
2022 5
2023 2
2024 2
2025 5
Total 129
Download as CSV

Annet H. de Lange publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annet H. de Lange sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 97 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 97
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Annet H. de Lange D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Annet H. de Lange sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Annet H. de Lange is affiliated with the Open University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to research in health professions and social sciences. Their work covers a broad range of topics, including retirement, disability, employment, job satisfaction, workplace health, and occupational safety.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Health Professions
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, de Lange has focused on several subfields:

  • General Health Professions
  • Demography
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Their research covers key topics such as:

  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Labor market dynamics and wage inequality

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by de Lange are:

  • Employable as We Age? A Systematic Review of Relationships Between Age Conceptualizations and Employability (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • The influence of human resource practices on perceived work ability and the preferred retirement age: A latent growth modelling approach (2020), Human Resource Management Journal
  • Stimulating Job Crafting Behaviors of Older Workers: the Influence of Opportunity-Enhancing Human Resource Practices and Psychological Empowerment (2021), European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • Unravelling the process between career shock and career (un)sustainability: exploring the role of perceived human resource management (2020), Career Development International
  • Supporting Double Duty Caregiving and Good Employment Practices in Health Care Within an Aging Society (2020), Frontiers in Psychology

De Lange collaborates regularly with several researchers, including:

  • Karen Pak
  • Dorien Kooij
  • Marc van Veldhoven
  • Sarah Detaille
  • Josephine Engels

The scientist's work has been published frequently in venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Work & Stress
  • Sustainability
  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Neuroscience

In addition to articles, Annet H. de Lange has contributed to book publications, including a title published by Frontiers Media:

  • Healthy Healthcare: Empirical Occupational Health Research and Evidence-Based Practice (2020)

Best Publications

  • The Very Best of the Millennium: Longitudinal Research and the Demand-Control-(Support) Model

    A.H.de Lange;T.W. Taris;M.A.J. Kompier;I.L.D. Houtman

  • Age and work‐related motives: Results of a meta‐analysis

    Dorien T. A. M. Kooij;Annet H. De Lange;Paul G. W. Jansen;Ruth Kanfer

  • Older workers' motivation to continue to work: Five meanings of age: A conceptual review.

    Dorien Kooij;Annet de Lange;Paul Jansen;Josje Dikkers;Josje Dikkers

  • Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta-analysis of age as a moderator

    P. Matthijs Bal;Annet H. De lange;Paul G. W. Jansen;Mandy E. G. Van der Velde

  • The relationships between work characteristics and mental health: examining normal, reversed and reciprocal relationships in a 4-wave study

    Annet H. De Lange;Toon W. Taris;Michiel A. J. Kompier;Irene L. D. Houtman

  • The influence of age on the associations between HR practices and both affective commitment and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis

    Dorien T. A. M. Kooij;Paul G. W. Jansen;Josje S. E. Dikkers;Annet H. de lange

  • Should I stay or should I go? Examining longitudinal relations among job resources and work engagement for stayers versus movers

    Annet H. de Lange;Hans De Witte;Guy Notelaers;Guy Notelaers

  • Age effects on the employability-career success relationship

    Beatrice I. J. M. Van der Heijden;Beatrice I. J. M. Van der Heijden;Annet H. de Lange;Evangelia Demerouti;Claudia M. Van der Heijde

  • From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multisample study

    P. Matthijs Bal;Annet H. De Lange;Annet H. De Lange;Annet H. De Lange

  • Moving European research on work and ageing forward : Overview and agenda

    René Schalk;Marc Van Veldhoven;Annet H. de Lange;Hans De Witte

  • Different mechanisms to explain the reversed effects of mental health on work characteristics.

    A.H. de Lange;T.W. Taris;M.A.J. Kompier;I.L.D. Houtman

  • A hard day's night: a longitudinal study on the relationships among job demands and job control, sleep quality and fatigue

    Annet H. De Lange;Michiel A. J. Kompier;Toon W. Taris;Sabine A. E. Geurts

  • Managing aging workers: a mixed methods study on bundles of HR practices for aging workers

    Dorien T. A. M. Kooij;Paul G. W. Jansen;Josje S. E. Dikkers;Annet H. de Lange

  • Learning new behaviour patterns: a longitudinal test of Karasek's active learning hypothesis among Dutch teachers

    Toon W. Taris;Michiel A. J. Kompier;Annet H. De Lange;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Human Resource Management and the ability, motivation and opportunity to continue working: A review of quantitative studies

    Karen Pak;Karen Pak;Dorien T.A.M. Kooij;Annet H. De Lange;Annet H. De Lange;Annet H. De Lange;Marc J.P.M. Van Veldhoven

  • Dominant achievement goals of older workers and their relationship with motivation-related outcomes

    Annet H. de Lange;Nico W. Van Yperen;Beatrice I. J. M. Van der Heijden;Beatrice I. J. M. Van der Heijden;P. Matthijs Bal

  • The role of future time perspective in psychological contracts: A study among older workers

    P. Matthijs Bal;Paul G. W. Jansen;Mandy E. G. van der Velde;Annet H. de Lange

  • On the relationships among work characteristics and learning-related behavior: Does age matter?

    Annet H. De Lange;Toon W. Taris;Toon W. Taris;Paul Jansen;Michiel A. J. Kompier

  • Effects of stable and changing demand-control histories on worker health.

    Annet H de Lange;Toon W Taris;Michiel A J Kompier;Irene L D Houtman

  • Proactivity, job characteristics, and engagement: a longitudinal study

    Josje S.E. Dikkers;Paul G.W. Jansen;Annet H. de Lange;Claartje J. Vinkenburg

  • Older workers motivation to continue to work: five meanings of age: A conceptual review

    Dorien Kooij;Annet de Lange;Paul Jansen

Frequent Co-Authors

Beatrice van der Heijden
Beatrice van der Heijden Radboud University
P. Matthijs Bal
P. Matthijs Bal University of Lincoln
Paul Jansen
Paul Jansen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Hannes Zacher
Hannes Zacher Leipzig University
René Schalk
René Schalk Tilburg University
Toon W. Taris
Toon W. Taris Utrecht University
Michiel A. J. Kompier
Michiel A. J. Kompier Radboud University
Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Guy Notelaers
Guy Notelaers University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to numerous online degree programs and diverse career options. One of the most sought-after specializations is Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which combines advanced education with professional certification. BCBA certification is valuable for those interested in behavioral therapy, counseling, and interventions for children and adults.

Requirements for BCBA certification vary by location. For example, you can review the bcba certification requirements in New York City to understand specific educational and practical experience standards in the state of New York. If you’re in New Jersey, the Newark bcba requirements provide useful guidance on local licensing needs. Those in the Southeast might explore the bcba certification requirements in Norfolk for Virginia-specific criteria, while students in Nevada should check the guide for becoming a bcba in North Las Vegas.

Whether you plan to work in schools, clinics, or private practice, understanding local certification and degree requirements is critical. Explore these resources to plan your educational journey and map out a successful psychology career path.

Best Scientists Citing Annet H. de Lange

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles