World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8073 7534 4326 3935 186 11162

Cort W. Rudolph publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cort W. Rudolph between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cort W. Rudolph published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2021. 33 of the 257 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2021. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 19 publications
2007 2025

257 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cort W. Rudolph: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 3
2009 4
2010 6
2011 3
2012 5
2013 6
2014 5
2015 9
2016 5
2017 22
2018 15
2019 20
2020 26
2021 41
2022 36
2023 17
2024 14
2025 19
Total 257
Download as CSV

Cort W. Rudolph publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cort W. Rudolph sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 186
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cort W. Rudolph D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cort W. Rudolph sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cort W. Rudolph is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans psychology, social sciences, and business, management, and accounting, with a focus on organizational behavior and human resource management, sociology and political science, demography, general health professions, and social psychology.

Their recent publications include "Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology" (2021) in Industrial and Organizational Psychology and "Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths in Organizational Science and Practice and Paving New Paths Forward" (2020) in the Journal of Business and Psychology. Other notable relevant works, though authored by frequent collaborators, contain topics closely related to Rudolph's research domain.

Frequent coauthors in their scholarly work include:

  • Hannes Zacher
  • Rachel S. Rauvola
  • Ian M. Katz
  • David P. Costanza
  • Clara Kühner

Rudolph's work has appeared in multiple publication venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Work Aging and Retirement
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Group & Organization Management
  • Academy of Management Proceedings

Their research covers topics including:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Selected recent papers relevant to their research are:

  • "Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology," 2021, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • "Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths in Organizational Science and Practice and Paving New Paths Forward," 2020, Journal of Business and Psychology

Best Publications

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

    Kevin M. Kniffin;Jayanth Narayanan;Frederik Anseel;John Antonakis

  • Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes

    Cort W. Rudolph;Ian M. Katz;Kristi N. Lavigne;Hannes Zacher;Hannes Zacher

  • Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results

    Cort W. Rudolph;Kristi N. Lavigne;Hannes Zacher;Hannes Zacher

  • Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Dorien T A M Kooij;Ruth Kanfer;Matt Betts;Cort W Rudolph

  • Thriving at Work: A Meta-Analysis

    Anne-Kathrin Kleine;Anne-Kathrin Kleine;Cort W. Rudolph;Hannes Zacher

  • Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis

    Anne C. Bal;Abigail E. B. Reiss;Cort W. Rudolph;Boris B. Baltes

  • Leadership and generations at work: A critical review

    Cort W. Rudolph;Rachel S. Rauvola;Hannes Zacher

  • A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace

    Cort W. Rudolph;Charles L. Wells;Marcus D. Weller;Boris B. Baltes

  • Employee green behavior: A meta‐analysis

    Unknown

  • Academic career development: A review and research agenda

    Hannes Zacher;Cort W. Rudolph;Tara Todorovic;Daniel Ammann

  • Occupational Future Time Perspective: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Outcomes

    Cort W. Rudolph;Dorien T. A. M. Kooij;Rachel S. Rauvola;Hannes Zacher

  • Linking dimensions of career adaptability to adaptation results: A meta-analysis

    Cort W. Rudolph;Kristi N. Lavigne;Ian M. Katz;Hannes Zacher;Hannes Zacher

  • Lifespan Developmental Perspectives on Working: A Literature Review of Motivational Theories

    Cort W. Rudolph

  • Considering generations from a lifespan developmental perspective

    Cort W. Rudolph;Hannes Zacher

  • Empirical developments in career construction theory

    Cort W. Rudolph;Hannes Zacher;Andreas Hirschi

  • Organizational Support Factors and Work–Family Outcomes: Exploring Gender Differences

    Malissa A. Clark;Cort W. Rudolph;Ludmila Zhdanova;Jesse S. Michel

  • A Review of Aging Theories and Modern Work Perspectives

    Boris B. Baltes;Cort W. Rudolph;Anne C. Bal

  • Age and health jointly moderate the influence of flexible work arrangements on work engagement: Evidence from two empirical studies.

    Cort W. Rudolph;Boris B. Baltes

Frequent Co-Authors

Hannes Zacher
Hannes Zacher Leipzig University
Boris B. Baltes
Boris B. Baltes Wayne State University
Beatrice van der Heijden
Beatrice van der Heijden Radboud University
Annet H. de Lange
Annet H. de Lange Open University in the Netherlands
Andreas Hirschi
Andreas Hirschi University of Bern
Guido Hertel
Guido Hertel University of Münster
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jason D. Shaw
Jason D. Shaw Nanyang Technological University
Gary Johns
Gary Johns Concordia University
Evangelia Demerouti
Evangelia Demerouti Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology online opens up a variety of degree options and flexible career pathways. Many top institutions across the U.S. now offer comprehensive online programs, allowing students to balance their studies with other commitments.

For those considering further education, options include specialized programs such as the online psychology master's degrees in California, which stand out for their strong research focus. In the southeast, students can explore programs listed in the best online psychology master's degree rankings in Florida, known for their diverse course offerings and accessibility.

The Midwest also features reputable options like the online psychology master's degrees in Kansas, providing robust training for aspiring professionals. Meanwhile, students looking for programs in the northeast can consider the best online master's in psychology degree programs ranking in New York.

Graduates of these online programs often pursue careers in counseling, research, education, or human resources. With the growth of telehealth and online education, career opportunities for psychology graduates continue to expand, especially for those with a flexible, online learning background.

Best Scientists Citing Cort W. Rudolph

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles