World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
11162
World Ranking
8073
National Ranking
4326

Cort W. Rudolph publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cort W. Rudolph sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 186 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Cort W. Rudolph D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cort W. Rudolph sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cort W. Rudolph is affiliated with Wayne State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans psychology, social sciences, and business, management, and accounting, with a focus on organizational behavior and human resource management, sociology and political science, demography, general health professions, and social psychology.

Their recent publications include "Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology" (2021) in Industrial and Organizational Psychology and "Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths in Organizational Science and Practice and Paving New Paths Forward" (2020) in the Journal of Business and Psychology. Other notable relevant works, though authored by frequent collaborators, contain topics closely related to Rudolph's research domain.

Frequent coauthors in their scholarly work include:

  • Hannes Zacher
  • Rachel S. Rauvola
  • Ian M. Katz
  • David P. Costanza
  • Clara Kühner

Rudolph's work has appeared in multiple publication venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Work Aging and Retirement
  • Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • Group & Organization Management
  • Academy of Management Proceedings

Their research covers topics including:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Selected recent papers relevant to their research are:

  • "Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology," 2021, Industrial and Organizational Psychology
  • "Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths in Organizational Science and Practice and Paving New Paths Forward," 2020, Journal of Business and Psychology

Best Publications

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

    Kevin M. Kniffin;Jayanth Narayanan;Frederik Anseel;John Antonakis

  • Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes

    Cort W. Rudolph;Ian M. Katz;Kristi N. Lavigne;Hannes Zacher;Hannes Zacher

  • Career adaptability: A meta-analysis of relationships with measures of adaptivity, adapting responses, and adaptation results

    Cort W. Rudolph;Kristi N. Lavigne;Hannes Zacher;Hannes Zacher

  • Individual differences and changes in subjective wellbeing during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Hannes Zacher;Cort W. Rudolph

  • Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Dorien T A M Kooij;Ruth Kanfer;Matt Betts;Cort W Rudolph

  • Thriving at Work: A Meta-Analysis

    Anne-Kathrin Kleine;Anne-Kathrin Kleine;Cort W. Rudolph;Hannes Zacher

  • Pandemics: Implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology

    Cort W. Rudolph;Blake Allan;Malissa Clark;Guido Hertel

  • Examining Positive and Negative Perceptions of Older Workers: A Meta-Analysis

    Anne C. Bal;Abigail E. B. Reiss;Cort W. Rudolph;Boris B. Baltes

  • Leadership and generations at work: A critical review

    Cort W. Rudolph;Rachel S. Rauvola;Hannes Zacher

  • A meta-analysis of empirical studies of weight-based bias in the workplace

    Cort W. Rudolph;Charles L. Wells;Marcus D. Weller;Boris B. Baltes

  • Employee green behavior: A meta‐analysis

    Unknown

  • Academic career development: A review and research agenda

    Hannes Zacher;Cort W. Rudolph;Tara Todorovic;Daniel Ammann

  • Occupational Future Time Perspective: A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Outcomes

    Cort W. Rudolph;Dorien T. A. M. Kooij;Rachel S. Rauvola;Hannes Zacher

  • Linking dimensions of career adaptability to adaptation results: A meta-analysis

    Cort W. Rudolph;Kristi N. Lavigne;Ian M. Katz;Hannes Zacher;Hannes Zacher

  • Generations and Generational Differences: Debunking Myths in Organizational Science and Practice and Paving New Paths Forward.

    Cort W. Rudolph;Rachel S. Rauvola;David P. Costanza;Hannes Zacher

  • Lifespan Developmental Perspectives on Working: A Literature Review of Motivational Theories

    Cort W. Rudolph

  • Considering generations from a lifespan developmental perspective

    Cort W. Rudolph;Hannes Zacher

  • Pandemics: Implications for Research and Practice in Industrial and Organizational Psychology

    Unknown

  • Empirical developments in career construction theory

    Cort W. Rudolph;Hannes Zacher;Andreas Hirschi

  • A systematic review and critique of research on “healthy leadership”.

    Cort W. Rudolph;Lauren D. Murphy;Hannes Zacher

  • Organizational Support Factors and Work–Family Outcomes: Exploring Gender Differences

    Malissa A. Clark;Cort W. Rudolph;Ludmila Zhdanova;Jesse S. Michel

  • A Review of Aging Theories and Modern Work Perspectives

    Boris B. Baltes;Cort W. Rudolph;Anne C. Bal

  • Age and health jointly moderate the influence of flexible work arrangements on work engagement: Evidence from two empirical studies.

    Cort W. Rudolph;Boris B. Baltes

Frequent Co-Authors

Hannes Zacher
Hannes Zacher Leipzig University
Boris B. Baltes
Boris B. Baltes Wayne State University
Beatrice van der Heijden
Beatrice van der Heijden Radboud University
Annet H. de Lange
Annet H. de Lange Open University in the Netherlands
Andreas Hirschi
Andreas Hirschi University of Bern
Guido Hertel
Guido Hertel University of Münster
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jason D. Shaw
Jason D. Shaw Nanyang Technological University
Gary Johns
Gary Johns Concordia University
Evangelia Demerouti
Evangelia Demerouti Eindhoven University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology online opens up a variety of degree options and flexible career pathways. Many top institutions across the U.S. now offer comprehensive online programs, allowing students to balance their studies with other commitments.

For those considering further education, options include specialized programs such as the online psychology master's degrees in California, which stand out for their strong research focus. In the southeast, students can explore programs listed in the best online psychology master's degree rankings in Florida, known for their diverse course offerings and accessibility.

The Midwest also features reputable options like the online psychology master's degrees in Kansas, providing robust training for aspiring professionals. Meanwhile, students looking for programs in the northeast can consider the best online master's in psychology degree programs ranking in New York.

Graduates of these online programs often pursue careers in counseling, research, education, or human resources. With the growth of telehealth and online education, career opportunities for psychology graduates continue to expand, especially for those with a flexible, online learning background.

Best Scientists Citing Cort W. Rudolph

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles