World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Donald M. Truxillo

Donald M. Truxillo

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
11987
World Ranking
5853
National Ranking
11

Donald M. Truxillo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald M. Truxillo sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Donald M. Truxillo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald M. Truxillo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Donald M. Truxillo is affiliated with the University of Limerick in Ireland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Health Professions, with a substantial focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Demography, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's work covers various main topics including Retirement, Disability, and Employment; Employment and Welfare Studies; Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior; Employer Branding and e-HRM; Aging and Gerontology Research; Personality Traits and Psychology; and Public Relations and Crisis Communication.

Frequently publishing in venues such as Work Aging and Retirement, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, Human Resource Management, Academy of Management Proceedings, and PsycTESTS Dataset, the scientist has a consistent presence in journals that intersect workforce aging, organizational assessment, and human resource topics.

Key recent papers authored include:

  • The lagged influence of organizations' human resources practices on employees' career sustainability: The moderating role of age (2020, Journal of Vocational Behavior)
  • What's age got to do with it? A primer and review of the workplace aging literature (2022, Personnel Psychology)
  • Distressed and distracted by COVID-19 during high-stakes virtual interviews: The role of job interview anxiety on performance and reactions (2021, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • New Horizons for Newcomer Organizational Socialization: A Review, Meta-Analysis, and Future Research Directions (2024, Journal of Management)
  • Challenges in the New Economy: A New Era for Work Design (2023, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior)

Collaborations have frequently involved coauthors such as Grant M. Brady, Talya N. Bauer, Sara Zaniboni, David M. Cadiz, and Dorien Kooij, indicating a strong network within organizational and psychological research circles.

Donald M. Truxillo has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association since 2007, reflecting professional acknowledgment within the field.

Best Publications

  • Newcomer Adjustment During Organizational Socialization: A Meta- Analytic Review of Antecedents, Outcomes, and Methods

    Talya N. Bauer;Todd Bodner;Berrin Erdogan;Donald M. Truxillo

  • Whistle While You Work A Review of the Life Satisfaction Literature

    Berrin Erdogan;Talya N. Bauer;Donald M. Truxillo;Layla R. Mansfield

  • APPLICANT REACTIONS TO SELECTION: DEVELOPMENT OF THE SELECTION PROCEDURAL JUSTICE SCALE (SPJS)

    Talya N. Bauer;Donald M. Truxillo;Rudolph J. Sanchez;Jane M. Craig

  • Overqualified Employees: Making the Best of a Potentially Bad Situation for Individuals and Organizations

    Berrin Erdogan;Talya N. Bauer;José María Peiró;Donald M. Truxillo

  • Supporting the Aging Workforce: A Review and Recommendations for Workplace Intervention Research

    Donald M. Truxillo;David M. Cadiz;Leslie B. Hammer

  • A lifespan perspective on job design: Fitting the job and the worker to promote job satisfaction, engagement, and performance

    Donald M. Truxillo;David M. Cadiz;Jennifer R. Rineer;Sara Zaniboni

  • Applicant Perspectives During Selection: A Review Addressing “So What?,” “What’s New?,” and “Where to Next?”

    Julie M. McCarthy;Talya N. Bauer;Donald M. Truxillo;Neil R. Anderson

  • Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: a longitudinal field study.

    Donald M. Truxillo;Talya N. Bauer;Michael A. Campion;Matthew E. Paronto

  • UNDERSTANDING NEWCOMERS’ ADAPTABILITY AND WORK-RELATED OUTCOMES: TESTING THE MEDIATING ROLES OF PERCEIVED P–E FIT VARIABLES

    Mo Wang;Yujie Zhan;Elizabeth Mccune;Donald Truxillo

  • A field study of frame-of-reference effects on personality test validity.

    John M. Hunthausen;Donald M. Truxillo;Talya N. Bauer;Leslie B. Hammer

  • Effectiveness of total worker health interventions.

    W. Kent Anger;Diane L. Elliot;Todd Bodner;Ryan Olson

  • Navigating Uncharted Waters: Newcomer Socialization Through the Lens of Stress Theory

    Allison M. Ellis;Talya N. Bauer;Layla R. Mansfield;Berrin Erdogan

  • Age as moderator of the relationship of proactive personality with training motivation, perceived career development from training, and training behavioral intentions

    Marilena Bertolino;Donald M. Truxillo;Franco Fraccaroli

  • The Importance of Organizational Justice in Personnel Selection: Defining When Selection Fairness Really Matters

    Donald M. Truxillo;Dirk D. Steiner;Stephen W. Gilliland

  • Differential effects of task variety and skill variety on burnout and turnover intentions for older and younger workers

    Sara Zaniboni;Donald M. Truxillo;Franco Fraccaroli

  • Development and examination of an expectancy-based measure of test-taking motivation.

    Rudolph J. Sanchez;Donald M. Truxillo;Talya N. Bauer

  • Selection in the Information Age: The Impact of Privacy Concerns and Computer Experience on Applicant Reactions

    Talya N. Bauer;Donald M. Truxillo;Jennifer S. Tucker;Vaunne Weathers

  • Applicant Reactions to Different Selection Technology: Face-to-Face, Interactive Voice Response, and Computer-Assisted Telephone Screening Interviews

    Talya N. Bauer;Donald M. Truxillo;Matthew E. Paronto;Jeff A. Weekley

  • Effects of Explanations on Applicant Reactions: A meta-analytic review

    Donald M. Truxillo;Todd E. Bodner;Marilena Bertolino;Talya N. Bauer

  • College Education and Police Job Performance: A Ten-Year Study:

    Donald M. Truxillo;Suzanne R. Bennett;Michelle L. Collins

  • The effects of purpose of appraisal and individual differences in stereotypes of women on sex differences in performance ratings: A laboratory and field study.

    Gregory H. Dobbins;Robert L. Cardy;Donald M. Truxillo

Frequent Co-Authors

Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University
Berrin Erdogan
Berrin Erdogan Portland State University
Leslie B. Hammer
Leslie B. Hammer Oregon Health & Science University
Todd Bodner
Todd Bodner Portland State University
Ruth Kanfer
Ruth Kanfer Georgia Institute of Technology
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Michael A. Campion
Michael A. Campion Purdue University West Lafayette
José M. Peiró
José M. Peiró University of Valencia
Neil Anderson
Neil Anderson University of Bradford
Laura Borgogni
Laura Borgogni Sapienza University of Rome

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology often leads students to consider diverse online degrees, including counseling, clinical supervision, or research-focused programs. Many graduates aim to become Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs), a pathway that helps them provide vital mental health services. However, licensure requirements vary significantly by state, making it essential to understand your local guidelines.

For example, if you plan to practice in the South, review the lpc licensure requirements in Louisiana to learn about degree, exam, and supervision standards. Students in the Northeast should examine the lpc licensure requirements in Maine or the Maryland lpc licensure requirements, as these differ in core coursework, practicum hours, and licensing exams.

Those interested in New England will find specific procedures described in the Massachusetts licensed professional counselor requirements. No matter which state you choose, researching regional licensure rules early in your studies is crucial for a smooth transition from online degree programs to a fulfilling psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Donald M. Truxillo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles