World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
67
Citations
32366
World Ranking
2537
National Ranking
277

Neil Anderson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Anderson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Neil Anderson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil Anderson is affiliated with the University of Bradford in the United Kingdom. Their primary research contributions are situated within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on aspects related to Infectious Diseases, as well as intersecting subfields including Geophysics, Information Systems, Education, and Surgery.

The scientist's research spans several main topics, illustrated by their work on health disparities and outcomes, geophysical and geoelectrical methods, seismic waves and analysis, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing, animal disease management and epidemiology, and cloud computing and resource management.

Neil Anderson has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, reflecting ongoing partnerships in their research endeavors. Notable collaborators include David Cutting, Leo Galway, Andrew McDowell, Janak Adhikari, and Frank Kee.

Their works have been published across various academic venues with multiple contributions. Frequent publication venues include The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, EDULEARN proceedings, Frontiers in Psychology, Education and New Developments, and Education and New Developments 2020.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Neil Anderson include:

  • Clinical validation of an AI-based pathology tool for scoring of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (2024), published in Nature Medicine
  • Landscape genetics of wolverines (Gulo gulo): scale-dependent effects of bioclimatic, topographic, and anthropogenic variables (2020), published in Journal of Mammalogy
  • The Influence of Equipment and Environment on Children and Young Adults Learning Aquatic Skills (2021), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Development of a Digital Lifestyle Modification Intervention for Use after Transient Ischaemic Attack or Minor Stroke: A Person-Based Approach (2021), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Association between community-based self-reported COVID-19 symptoms and social deprivation explored using symptom tracker apps: a repeated cross-sectional study in Northern Ireland (2021), published in BMJ Open

Neil Anderson has also contributed to academic book publications. They authored a book titled Professionalizing Your English Language Teaching published by Springer International Publishing in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Innovation and Creativity in Organizations A State-of-the-Science Review, Prospective Commentary, and Guiding Framework

    Neil Anderson;Kristina Potočnik;Jing Zhou

  • Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory

    Neil R. Anderson;Michael A. West

  • Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research.

    Ute R. Hülsheger;Neil Anderson;Jesus F. Salgado

  • Innovation in top management teams

    Michael A. West;Neil R. Anderson

  • The routinization of innovation research : A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science

    Neil Anderson;Carsten K. W. De Dreu;Bernard A. Nijstad

  • The psychological contract in retrospect and prospect

    Neil Anderson;René Schalk

  • Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology

    Neil Anderson;Deniz S Ones;Handan Kepir Sinangil;Chockalingam Viswesvaran

  • The Power of Momentum: A New Model of Dynamic Relationships between Job Satisfaction Change and Turnover Intentions

    Gilad Chen;Robert E. Ployhart;Helena Cooper Thomas;Neil Anderson

  • A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity

    Ronald Bledow;Michael Frese;Neil Anderson;Miriam Erez

  • Fairness reactions to personnel selection methods: An international comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and Singapore

    Neil Anderson;Carlijn Witvliet

  • The practitioner‐researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here?

    Neil Anderson;Peter Herriot;Gerard P. Hodgkinson

  • The team climate inventory: Development of the tci and its applications in teambuilding for innovativeness

    Neil Anderson;Michael A. West

  • A meta-analytic study of general mental ability validity for different occupations in the European community.

    Jesús F Salgado;Neil Anderson;Silvia Moscoso;Cristina Bertua

  • Innovation and Change In Organizations

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Managing innovation and change

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Organizational socialization: A new theoretical model and recommendations for future research and HRM practices in organizations

    Helena D. Cooper‐Thomas;Neil Anderson

  • Changes in newcomers' psychological contracts during organizational socialization: a study of recruits entering the British Army

    Helena D. C. Thomas;Neil Anderson

  • Managing innovation and change : a critical guide for organizations

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Applicant and Recruiter Reactions to New Technology in Selection: A Critical Review and Agenda for Future Research

    Neil Anderson

  • Newcomer adjustment: The relationship between organizational socialization tactics, information acquisition and attitudes

    Helena Cooper-Thomas;Neil Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jesús F. Salgado
Jesús F. Salgado University of Santiago de Compostela
Michael West
Michael West Duke University
Deniz S. Ones
Deniz S. Ones University of Minnesota
Ute-Christine Klehe
Ute-Christine Klehe University of Giessen
Helena D. Cooper-Thomas
Helena D. Cooper-Thomas Auckland University of Technology
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Chockalingam Viswesvaran
Chockalingam Viswesvaran Florida International University
Nigel King
Nigel King University of Huddersfield
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University
Talya N. Bauer
Talya N. Bauer Portland State University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens doors to diverse and rewarding career options. As demand grows for mental health and behavioral specialists, many students are choosing flexible, online learning paths. Accredited online psychology programs offer the same rigorous curriculum as on-campus options, making them a smart choice for working students or those seeking convenience.

Researching the top psychology programs in Virginia Beach can help you compare curriculum features and specializations near the East Coast. Meanwhile, reviewing the best psychology degree programs ranking in Waco provides insight into innovative approaches and community involvement opportunities in Texas.

If you prefer studying in a dynamic city, the best psychology degree rankings in Washington, D.C. highlight top institutions with strong research initiatives and networking potential. And for students in the Midwest, exploring the best psychology program rankings in Wichita can help you find programs tailored to your interests.

Whether pursuing a clinical, counseling, forensic, or research-focused path, these resources can guide your decision-making on the next step toward a fulfilling psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Anderson

Trending Scientists