World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Bamberger

Peter Bamberger

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
12418
World Ranking
5371
National Ranking
43

Peter Bamberger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Bamberger sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter Bamberger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Bamberger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Bamberger is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel and conducts research primarily in the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their work concentrates on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, with additional focus on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Demography.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Bamberger has published extensively, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Academy of Management Journal
  • Journal of Drug Issues
  • Occupational Health Science

Among recent papers are:

  • "COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action." (2020, American Psychologist)
  • "Best Not to Know: Pay Secrecy, Employee Voluntary Turnover, and the Conditioning Effect of Distributive Justice" (2020, Academy of Management Journal)
  • "Pay communication, justice, and affect: The asymmetric effects of process and outcome pay transparency on counterproductive workplace behavior." (2020, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • "Unacceptable behaviours between healthcare workers: just the tip of the patient safety iceberg" (2022, BMJ Quality & Safety)
  • "Is student loan debt good or bad for full-time employment upon graduation from college?" (2020, Journal of Applied Psychology)

Collaborations are a significant part of Bamberger's research activities. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Mo Wang
  • Samuel B. Bacharach
  • Mary E. Larimer
  • Ilanit SimanTov-Nachlieli
  • Inbal Nahum-Shani

Bamberger's work addresses various dimensions of workplace dynamics, including justice perceptions, communication transparency, employee turnover, health safety, and behavioral outcomes in organizational settings. Their research integrates interdisciplinary approaches to explore complex social and psychological factors affecting employees and organizations.

Best Publications

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

    Kevin M. Kniffin;Jayanth Narayanan;Frederik Anseel;John Antonakis

  • Work-home conflict among nurses and engineers: Mediating the impact of role stress on burnout and satisfaction at work

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;Sharon Conley

  • Taking Stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work

    Gretchen Spreitzer;Peter Bamberger;Jane Dutton;Dafna Eylon

  • From the Editors Beyond Contextualization: Using Context Theories to Narrow the Micro-Macro Gap in Management Research

    Peter Bamberger

  • The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Alignment of Logics of Action

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;William J. Sonnenstuhl

  • Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account

    Peter A. Bamberger;Samuel B. Bacharach

  • Moving Forward by Looking Back: Reclaiming Unconventional Research Contexts and Samples in Organizational Scholarship

    Peter A. Bamberger;Michael G. Pratt

  • The Impact of Rudeness on Medical Team Performance: A Randomized Trial.

    Arieh Riskin;Amir Erez;Trevor A. Foulk;Amir Kugelman

  • The Dimensionality of Decision Participation in Educational Organizations: The Value of a Multi-Domain Evaluative Approach

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;Sharon C. Conley;Scott Bauer

  • Diversity and Homophily at Work: Supportive Relations Among White and African-American Peers

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter A. Bamberger;Dana Vashdi

  • Work Processes, Role Conflict, and Role Overload: The Case of Nurses and Engineers in the Public Sector.

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;Sharon C. Conley

  • Employee help-seeking: Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research

    Peter Bamberger

  • Human resource strategy: formulation, implementation, and impact

    Peter Bamberger;Ilan Meshoulam

  • Firefighters, critical incidents, and drinking to cope: the adequacy of unit-level performance resources as a source of vulnerability and protection.

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter A. Bamberger;Etti Doveh

  • Can Surgical Teams Ever Learn? The Role of Coordination, Complexity, and Transitivity in Action Team Learning

    Dana R. Vashdi;Peter A. Bamberger;Miriam Erez

  • Driven to Drink: Managerial Control, Work-Related Risk Factors, and Employee Problem Drinking

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter A. Bamberger;William J. Sonnenstuhl

  • 9/11 and New York City Firefighters' Post Hoc Unit Support and Control Climates: A Context Theory of the Consequences of Involvement in Traumatic Work-Related Events

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter A. Bamberger

  • Alcohol consumption and workplace absenteeism: the moderating effect of social support.

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;Michal Biron

  • The Role of Strategic Reference Points in Explaining the Nature and Consequences of Human Resource Strategy

    Peter Bamberger;Avi Fiegenbaum

  • Empowerment Cognitions and Empowerment Acts Recognizing the Importance of Gender

    Dafna Eylon;Peter Bamberger

  • Research Notes: The Antecedents and Consequences of Union Commitment: A Meta-Analysis

    Peter A. Bamberger;Avraham N. Kluger;Ronena Suchard

  • Group norms and excessive absenteeism : The role of peer referent others

    Peter Bamberger;Michal Biron

  • The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Allignment of Logics of Action

    Samuel Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;William Sonnenstuhl

  • Diversity and Homophily at Work: Supportive Relations among White and African-American Peers

    Peter Bamberger;Samuel Bacharach;Dana Rachel Vashdi

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel B. Bacharach
Samuel B. Bacharach Cornell University
Inbal Nahum-Shani
Inbal Nahum-Shani University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Junqi Shi
Junqi Shi Zhejiang University
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko Nanyang Technological University
Paul R. Sackett
Paul R. Sackett University of Minnesota
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Jesús F. Salgado
Jesús F. Salgado University of Santiago de Compostela
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees in the USA opens up a range of flexible and rewarding career options. Whether you’re interested in becoming a licensed counselor, school psychologist, or clinical therapist, an accredited online degree can help you achieve your goals while balancing life’s other responsibilities.

It’s important to consider both the value and regional accreditation of your chosen program. Many states offer high-quality online degrees, such as the best value counseling degrees in Wisconsin, which are known for their affordability and strong student outcomes. If you’re looking to study in the Southeast, the best value counseling master's degrees in the South provide similar advantages, including flexible schedules and practical training opportunities.

Students in Florida can also benefit from the most valuable counseling master's programs in Florida, which are recognized for their competitive tuition rates and success in preparing graduates for licensure. If you prefer to study in the Northeast, consider the best value counseling degrees in New York, known for strong faculty support and robust alumni networks. These pathways can lead to fulfilling roles in mental health, education, and community-based organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Bamberger

Trending Scientists