World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter Bamberger

Peter Bamberger

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5371 4986 43 39 146 12418

Peter Bamberger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Bamberger between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Bamberger published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2024. 26 of the 228 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2024. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 7 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 5 publications
1988 2025

228 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Bamberger: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 1
1990 7
1991 2
1992 1
1993 1
1994 0
1995 6
1996 3
1997 0
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 2
2002 1
2003 0
2004 6
2005 3
2006 5
2007 9
2008 10
2009 6
2010 7
2011 5
2012 8
2013 5
2014 18
2015 11
2016 8
2017 12
2018 4
2019 8
2020 10
2021 6
2022 8
2023 20
2024 21
2025 5
Total 228
Download as CSV

Peter Bamberger publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Bamberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 146
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Bamberger D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Bamberger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Bamberger is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel and conducts research primarily in the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their work concentrates on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, with additional focus on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, and Demography.

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Bamberger has published extensively, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Journal of Applied Psychology
  • Academy of Management Journal
  • Journal of Drug Issues
  • Occupational Health Science

Among recent papers are:

  • "COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action." (2020, American Psychologist)
  • "Best Not to Know: Pay Secrecy, Employee Voluntary Turnover, and the Conditioning Effect of Distributive Justice" (2020, Academy of Management Journal)
  • "Pay communication, justice, and affect: The asymmetric effects of process and outcome pay transparency on counterproductive workplace behavior." (2020, Journal of Applied Psychology)
  • "Unacceptable behaviours between healthcare workers: just the tip of the patient safety iceberg" (2022, BMJ Quality & Safety)
  • "Is student loan debt good or bad for full-time employment upon graduation from college?" (2020, Journal of Applied Psychology)

Collaborations are a significant part of Bamberger's research activities. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Mo Wang
  • Samuel B. Bacharach
  • Mary E. Larimer
  • Ilanit SimanTov-Nachlieli
  • Inbal Nahum-Shani

Bamberger's work addresses various dimensions of workplace dynamics, including justice perceptions, communication transparency, employee turnover, health safety, and behavioral outcomes in organizational settings. Their research integrates interdisciplinary approaches to explore complex social and psychological factors affecting employees and organizations.

Best Publications

  • COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action.

    Kevin M. Kniffin;Jayanth Narayanan;Frederik Anseel;John Antonakis

  • Work-home conflict among nurses and engineers: Mediating the impact of role stress on burnout and satisfaction at work

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;Sharon Conley

  • Taking Stock: A review of more than twenty years of research on empowerment at work

    Gretchen Spreitzer;Peter Bamberger;Jane Dutton;Dafna Eylon

  • From the Editors Beyond Contextualization: Using Context Theories to Narrow the Micro-Macro Gap in Management Research

    Peter Bamberger

  • The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Alignment of Logics of Action

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;William J. Sonnenstuhl

  • Abusive supervision and subordinate problem drinking: Taking resistance, stress and subordinate personality into account

    Peter A. Bamberger;Samuel B. Bacharach

  • Moving Forward by Looking Back: Reclaiming Unconventional Research Contexts and Samples in Organizational Scholarship

    Peter A. Bamberger;Michael G. Pratt

  • The Impact of Rudeness on Medical Team Performance: A Randomized Trial.

    Arieh Riskin;Amir Erez;Trevor A. Foulk;Amir Kugelman

  • The Dimensionality of Decision Participation in Educational Organizations: The Value of a Multi-Domain Evaluative Approach

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;Sharon C. Conley;Scott Bauer

  • Diversity and Homophily at Work: Supportive Relations Among White and African-American Peers

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter A. Bamberger;Dana Vashdi

  • Work Processes, Role Conflict, and Role Overload: The Case of Nurses and Engineers in the Public Sector.

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;Sharon C. Conley

  • Employee help-seeking: Antecedents, consequences and new insights for future research

    Peter Bamberger

  • Human resource strategy: formulation, implementation, and impact

    Peter Bamberger;Ilan Meshoulam

  • Firefighters, critical incidents, and drinking to cope: the adequacy of unit-level performance resources as a source of vulnerability and protection.

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter A. Bamberger;Etti Doveh

  • Can Surgical Teams Ever Learn? The Role of Coordination, Complexity, and Transitivity in Action Team Learning

    Dana R. Vashdi;Peter A. Bamberger;Miriam Erez

  • Driven to Drink: Managerial Control, Work-Related Risk Factors, and Employee Problem Drinking

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter A. Bamberger;William J. Sonnenstuhl

  • 9/11 and New York City Firefighters' Post Hoc Unit Support and Control Climates: A Context Theory of the Consequences of Involvement in Traumatic Work-Related Events

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter A. Bamberger

  • Alcohol consumption and workplace absenteeism: the moderating effect of social support.

    Samuel B. Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;Michal Biron

  • The Role of Strategic Reference Points in Explaining the Nature and Consequences of Human Resource Strategy

    Peter Bamberger;Avi Fiegenbaum

  • Empowerment Cognitions and Empowerment Acts Recognizing the Importance of Gender

    Dafna Eylon;Peter Bamberger

  • Research Notes: The Antecedents and Consequences of Union Commitment: A Meta-Analysis

    Peter A. Bamberger;Avraham N. Kluger;Ronena Suchard

  • Group norms and excessive absenteeism : The role of peer referent others

    Peter Bamberger;Michal Biron

  • The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Allignment of Logics of Action

    Samuel Bacharach;Peter Bamberger;William Sonnenstuhl

  • Diversity and Homophily at Work: Supportive Relations among White and African-American Peers

    Peter Bamberger;Samuel Bacharach;Dana Rachel Vashdi

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel B. Bacharach
Samuel B. Bacharach Cornell University
Inbal Nahum-Shani
Inbal Nahum-Shani University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Junqi Shi
Junqi Shi Zhejiang University
Filip Lievens
Filip Lievens Singapore Management University
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko
Oleksandr S. Chernyshenko Nanyang Technological University
Paul R. Sackett
Paul R. Sackett University of Minnesota
Herman Aguinis
Herman Aguinis George Washington University
Jesús F. Salgado
Jesús F. Salgado University of Santiago de Compostela
Cornelius J. König
Cornelius J. König Saarland University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees in the USA opens up a range of flexible and rewarding career options. Whether you’re interested in becoming a licensed counselor, school psychologist, or clinical therapist, an accredited online degree can help you achieve your goals while balancing life’s other responsibilities.

It’s important to consider both the value and regional accreditation of your chosen program. Many states offer high-quality online degrees, such as the best value counseling degrees in Wisconsin, which are known for their affordability and strong student outcomes. If you’re looking to study in the Southeast, the best value counseling master's degrees in the South provide similar advantages, including flexible schedules and practical training opportunities.

Students in Florida can also benefit from the most valuable counseling master's programs in Florida, which are recognized for their competitive tuition rates and success in preparing graduates for licensure. If you prefer to study in the Northeast, consider the best value counseling degrees in New York, known for strong faculty support and robust alumni networks. These pathways can lead to fulfilling roles in mental health, education, and community-based organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Bamberger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles