World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 51 5143 4769 2832 2564 175 13150

Thomas W. Britt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas W. Britt between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas W. Britt published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2015. 15 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2015. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications
1991 2025

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas W. Britt: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 3
1993 2
1994 2
1995 6
1996 5
1997 3
1998 1
1999 4
2000 3
2001 4
2002 0
2003 4
2004 3
2005 4
2006 10
2007 3
2008 6
2009 2
2010 3
2011 13
2012 11
2013 8
2014 7
2015 17
2016 12
2017 9
2018 6
2019 6
2020 10
2021 11
2022 12
2023 6
2024 7
2025 8
Total 213
Download as CSV

Thomas W. Britt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Britt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 175
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas W. Britt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas W. Britt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 51
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Thomas W. Britt is affiliated with Clemson University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Health Professions, with a concentration of publications in General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. They have also contributed to areas such as Social Psychology, Infectious Diseases, and Demography.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Spirituality and Leadership

Thomas W. Britt has published several papers, including:

  • Job Demands and Resources among Healthcare Professionals during Virus Pandemics: A Review and Examination of Fluctuations in Mental Health Strain during COVID-19 (2020, Applied Psychology)
  • Perceived resilience and social connection as predictors of adjustment following occupational adversity (2021, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology)

Other frequently cited recent papers in their broader research network are:

  • Occupational Health Science in the Time of COVID-19: Now more than Ever (2020, Occupational Health Science)
  • Chronicling moral distress among healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal analysis of mental health strain, burnout, and maladaptive coping behaviours (2021, International Journal of Mental Health Nursing)
  • Living to work: The role of occupational calling in response to challenge and hindrance stressors (2020, Work & Stress)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Thomas W. Britt include:

  • Chloe A. Wilson
  • Zachary Klinefelter
  • Kristen Jennings Black
  • Lauren A. Fowler
  • Robert R. Sinclair

Their work is commonly published in these venues:

  • Occupational Health Science
  • Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
  • Academic Emergency Medicine
  • Military Psychology
  • Work & Stress

In addition to journal articles, Thomas W. Britt has contributed to book publications. Notably, they are associated with a publication by Cambridge University Press titled The Cambridge Handbook of Stigma and Mental Health (2022).

Thomas W. Britt was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Organizational Psychology : A Scientist-Practitioner Approach

    Steve M. Jex;Thomas W. Britt

  • The triangle model of responsibility.

    Barry R. Schlenker;Thomas W. Britt;John Pennington;Rodolfo Murphy

  • Deriving benefits from stressful events: the role of engagement in meaningful work and hardiness.

    Thomas W. Britt;Amy B. Adler;Paul T. Bartone

  • The stigma of mental health problems in the military.

    Tiffany M. Greene-Shortridge;Thomas W. Britt;Carl Andrew Castro

  • How Much Do We Really Know About Employee Resilience

    Thomas W. Britt;Winny Shen;Robert R. Sinclair;Matthew R. Grossman

  • Stigma, Negative Attitudes About Treatment, and Utilization of Mental Health Care Among Soldiers

    Paul Y. Kim;Thomas W. Britt;Robert P. Klocko;Lyndon A. Riviere

  • Organizational work-family resources as predictors of job performance and attitudes: the process of work-family conflict and enrichment.

    Heather N. Odle-Dusseau;Thomas W. Britt;Tiffany M. Greene-Shortridge

  • Perceived Stigma and Barriers to Care for Psychological Treatment: Implications for Reactions to Stressors in Different Contexts

    Thomas W. Britt;Tiffany M. Greene–Shortridge;Sarah Brink;Quyen B. Nguyen

  • Social support, group consensus and stressor–strain relationships: Social context matters.

    Paul D. Bliese;Thomas W. Britt

  • The Stigma of Psychological Problems in a Work Environment: Evidence From the Screening of Service Members Returning From Bosnia1

    Thomas W. Britt

  • Insomnia as predictor versus outcome of PTSD and depression among Iraq combat veterans.

    Kathleen M. Wright;Thomas W. Britt;Thomas W. Britt;Paul D. Bliese;Amy B. Adler

  • How are perceived stigma, self-stigma, and self-reliance related to treatment-seeking? A three-path model.

    Kristen S. Jennings;Janelle H. Cheung;Thomas W. Britt;Kandice N. Goguen

  • Occupational Health Science in the Time of COVID-19: Now more than Ever.

    Robert R Sinclair;Tammy Allen;Lacie Barber;Mindy Bergman

  • Engaging the Self in the Field: Testing the Triangle Model of Responsibility

    Thomas W. Britt

  • Intergroup Anxiety: A Person × Situation Approach

    Thomas W. Britt;Kurt A. Bonieci;Theresa K. Vescio;Monica Biernat

  • Self-Engagement, Stressors, and Health: A Longitudinal Study

    Thomas W. Britt;Carl Andrew Castro;Amy B. Adler

  • How Leaders Can Influence the Impact That Stressors Have on Soldiers

    Thomas W. Britt;James Davison;Paul D. Bliese;Carl Andrew Castro

  • Stigma of mental illness and service use in the military.

    Dror Ben-Zeev;Patrick W Corrigan;Thomas W Britt;Linda Langford

  • Connecting active duty and returning veterans to mental health treatment: interventions and treatment adaptations that may reduce barriers to care.

    Heidi M. Zinzow;Thomas W. Britt;Anna C. McFadden;Crystal M. Burnette

  • Correlates and consequences of morale versus depression under stressful conditions.

    Thomas W. Britt;James M. Dickinson;DeWayne Moore;Carl A. Castro

Frequent Co-Authors

Amy B. Adler
Amy B. Adler Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Heidi M. Zinzow
Heidi M. Zinzow Clemson University
Paul D. Bliese
Paul D. Bliese University of South Carolina
Carl A. Castro
Carl A. Castro University of Southern California
Barry R. Schlenker
Barry R. Schlenker University of Florida
DeWayne Moore
DeWayne Moore Clemson University
Paul T. Bartone
Paul T. Bartone National Defense University
Jeffrey L. Thomas
Jeffrey L. Thomas United States Army Research Laboratory
Joanne M. Wood
Joanne M. Wood Queensland University of Technology
Christian S. Crandall
Christian S. Crandall University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Graduates of psychology programs in the USA can access a range of online degrees and dynamic career pathways. When researching programs, prospective students often ask: are online psychology degrees accredited? Accreditation ensures that your degree is recognized by employers and qualifies you for advanced study or certifications.

For those interested in workplace dynamics, understanding organizational psychologist duties is key. These professionals work with companies to improve productivity, employee satisfaction, and organizational structure. Another growing field is behavior analysis, with a variety of behavior analyst career paths available in education, healthcare, and business sectors.

Interested in the criminal justice system? You may want to learn about forensic psychology education requirements, as this specialty involves working with law enforcement, courts, and correctional settings. Each path requires different educational levels and qualifications, making it vital to compare programs and career options.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas W. Britt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles