World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5132
World Ranking
9549
National Ranking
5052

DeWayne Moore publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where DeWayne Moore sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

DeWayne Moore D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where DeWayne Moore sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

DeWayne Moore is affiliated with Clemson University in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the broad field of Social Sciences, with a focus on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Transportation, Social Psychology, and Communication.

Moore's recent scholarly contributions include several published papers spanning multiple topics related to tourism, customer service quality, and knowledge management. These papers cover themes of tourism research, cruise tourism development and management, recreation and leisure, as well as multimedia communication and technology.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Importance of residents' perception of tourists in establishing a reciprocal resident-tourist relationship: An application of tourist attractiveness (2022, Tourism Management)
  • Tourist attractiveness: measuring residents' perception of tourists (2020, Journal of Sustainable Tourism)
  • Enhancing patient participation in healthcare operations through patient training and education using the theoretical lens of media synchronicity (2021, Decision Sciences)
  • Individual differences in strategy use and performance during fault diagnosis (2020, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications)

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Moore has coauthored multiple works with Gyunghoon Kim and Lauren N. Duffy, as well as collaborations involving Uzay Damali, Lawrence D. Fredendall, and Janis L. Miller.

Their publications have appeared in journals and venues including:

  • Tourism Management
  • Journal of Sustainable Tourism
  • Decision Sciences
  • Cognitive Research Principles and Implications

Moore's main topics of investigation encompass:

  • Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Cruise Tourism Development and Management
  • Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Web and Library Services
  • Multimedia Communication and Technology

Best Publications

  • Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing

    Yu-Chih Huang;Sheila J. Backman;Kenneth F. Backman;DeWayne Moore

  • Development of a Theory-Based Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness

    Misty L. Loughry;Matthew W. Ohland;D. DeWayne Moore

  • Development of the serious leisure inventory and measure.

    James Gould;DeWayne Moore;Francis McGuire;Robert Stebbins

  • Insomnia as predictor versus outcome of PTSD and depression among Iraq combat veterans.

    Kathleen M. Wright;Thomas W. Britt;Thomas W. Britt;Paul D. Bliese;Amy B. Adler

  • Loneliness at adolescence: Correlates, attributions, and coping.

    DeWayne Moore;Norman R. Schultz

  • An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: a self-determination theory

    Yu-Chih Huang;Sheila J. Backman;Kenneth F. Backman;Francis A. McGuire

  • Parent–adolescent separation: The construction of adulthood by late adolescents.

    DeWayne Moore

  • Correlates and consequences of morale versus depression under stressful conditions.

    Thomas W. Britt;James M. Dickinson;DeWayne Moore;Carl A. Castro

  • Measuring Serious Leisure in Chess: Model Confirmation and Method Bias

    James Gould;Dewayne Moore;Nancy J. Karlin;Diane B. Gaede

  • INFLUENCE OF TEXT GENRE ON ADULTS' MONITORING OF UNDERSTANDING AND RECALL

    Karen M. Zabrucky;DeWayne Moore

  • Stress Appraisal and Coping Response to Hassles Experienced in Outdoor Recreation Settings

    Rudy Schuster;William E. Hammitt;Dewayne Moore

  • Leadership as a predictor of stigma and practical barriers toward receiving mental health treatment: a multilevel approach.

    Thomas W. Britt;Kathleen M. Wright;DeWayne Moore

  • Exploring policies for the reduction of child physical abuse and neglect.

    Joanne Klevens;Sarah Beth L. Barnett;Curtis S. Florence;DeWayne Moore

  • Loneliness Correlates, Attributions, and Coping among Older Adults

    Norman R. Schultz;DeWayne Moore

  • Knowing your customers: Using a reciprocal relationship to enhance voluntary information disclosure

    J. Christopher Zimmer;Riza Arsal;Mohammad Al-Marzouq;Dewayne Moore

  • The Loneliness Experience of College Students Sex Differences

    Norman R. Schultz;DeWayne Moore

  • Loneliness: Differences Across Three Age Levels

    Norman R. Schultz;DeWayne Moore

  • A theoretical model to measure the appraisal and coping response to hassles in outdoor recreation settings.

    Rudolph M. Schuster;William E. Hammitt;DeWayne Moore

  • AN ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS' CALIBRATION OF COMPREHENSION AND CALIBRATION OF PERFORMANCE USING MULTIPLE MEASURES

    Lin-Miao Lin;Dewayne Moore;Karen M. Zabrucky

  • Blood Pressure Increases during a Simulated Night Shift in Persons at Risk for Hypertension

    James A. McCubbin;June J. Pilcher;D. DeWayne Moore

  • Predicting Behavioral Intentions to Comply with Recommended Leave No Trace Practices

    Wade M. Vagias;Robert B. Powell;D. Dewayne Moore;Brett A. Wright

  • Contributions of Working Memory and Evaluation and Regulation of Understanding to Adults' Recall of Texts

    Karen Zabrucky;Dewayne Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas W. Britt
Thomas W. Britt Clemson University
Sheila J. Backman
Sheila J. Backman Clemson University
William C. Norman
William C. Norman Clemson University
Amy B. Adler
Amy B. Adler Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
Carl A. Castro
Carl A. Castro University of Southern California
William E. Hammitt
William E. Hammitt Clemson University
Robert A. Stebbins
Robert A. Stebbins University of Calgary
Paul D. Bliese
Paul D. Bliese University of South Carolina
Thomas S. Wallsten
Thomas S. Wallsten University of Maryland, College Park
Julian F. Thayer
Julian F. Thayer University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up a range of flexible options for students seeking to advance their education or transition into psychology careers. Many universities now offer accelerated online formats, enabling students to fast-track completion while balancing work or personal commitments.

For example, students looking for regional opportunities can find the accelerated online psychology bachelor's programs in Florida or explore the fastest online psychology bachelor's degrees in Houston for unique local options. Prospective students in Colorado will be interested in the fastest online psychology programs in Colorado, which offer regionally relevant online paths.

Those already holding a bachelor’s degree and aiming for advanced roles can consider the fastest online psychology doctorate programs in the US. These programs help professionals qualify for leadership or specialized clinical roles even with demanding schedules.

Whether you are seeking your first degree or aiming to advance with graduate study, online programs can offer a convenient, reputable route to your psychology career goals.

Best Scientists Citing DeWayne Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles