World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
5702
World Ranking
9814
National Ranking
5192

Deborah A. King publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah A. King sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 71 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Deborah A. King D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deborah A. King sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Deborah A. King is affiliated with the University of Rochester Medical Center in the United States. Their research contributions span multiple fields including economics and econometrics, general health professions, psychiatry and mental health, applied psychology, and epidemiology. The primary topics addressed in their work involve the economic and financial impacts of cancer, digital mental health interventions, dementia and cognitive impairment research, health systems and economic evaluations, quality of life, health policy implementation science, mental health and patient involvement, and multiple and secondary primary cancers.

The scientist has published frequently in venues such as JCO Oncology Practice, with four publications, as well as in Trials, Implementation Science, Behavioral Sciences, and Contemporary Clinical Trials. Their recent papers cover a range of interdisciplinary health issues and include the following:

  • The Cancer Financial Experience (CAFÉ) study: randomized controlled trial of a financial navigation intervention to address cancer-related financial hardship, 2022, Trials
  • Study protocol for a factorial-randomized controlled trial evaluating the implementation, costs, effectiveness, and sustainment of digital therapeutics for substance use disorder in primary care (DIGITS Trial), 2023, Implementation Science
  • Eliciting Willingness and Beliefs towards Participation in Genetic Psychiatric Testing in Black/African American Mothers at Risk for Depression, 2020, Behavioral Sciences
  • The electronic health record Risk of Alzheimer's and Dementia Assessment Rule (eRADAR) Brain Health Trial: Protocol for an embedded, pragmatic clinical trial of a low-cost dementia detection algorithm, 2023, Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • Service learning: Nursing students' civic engagement with diverse populations of children with special needs, 2022, Journal of Pediatric Nursing

The collaborative network of Deborah A. King includes frequent coauthors such as Nora B. Henrikson, Blake W. Locher, Amanda F. Petrik, Matthew P. Banegas, and Erin Keast, with repeated joint contributions indicating ongoing research partnerships.

Best Publications

  • Screening for Depression in Elderly Primary Care Patients: A Comparison of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies—Depression Scale and the Geriatric Depression Scale

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;Tamson Kelly Noel;Christopher Cox;Deborah A. King

  • Method Choice, Intent, and Gender in Completed Suicide

    Diane G. Denning;Yeates Conwell;Deborah King;Chris Cox

  • The importance of subsyndromal depression in older primary care patients: prevalence and associated functional disability.

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;Deborah A. King;Christopher Cox;Z. Yoediono

  • Older Age and the Underreporting of Depressive Symptoms

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;Christopher Cox;Jennifer Curry;Yeates Conwell

  • Psychiatric disorders in older primary care patients.

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;Eric D. Caine;Deborah A. King;Christopher Cox

  • The clinical significance of subsyndromal depression in older primary care patients.

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;JaeHyun Kim;JaeHyun Kim;Xin Tu;Yeates Conwell

  • Social support, depression, and functional disability in older adult primary-care patients.

    Linda A. Travis;Jeffrey M. Lyness;Cleveland G. Shields;Deborah A. King

  • Stimulus and response contingencies in the misbehavior of rats.

    William Timberlake;Glenda Wahl;Deborah A. King

  • Personality is associated with perceived health and functional status in older primary care patients.

    Paul R Duberstein;Silvia Sörensen;Jeffrey M Lyness;Deborah A King

  • Depressive symptoms, medical illness, and functional status in depressed psychiatric inpatients.

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;Eric D. Caine;Yeates Conwell;Deborah A. King

  • Depressive disorders and symptoms in older primary care patients: one-year outcomes.

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;Eric D. Caine;Deborah A. King;Yeates Conwell

  • A Neuropsychological Comparison of Depressed Suicide Attempters and Nonattempters

    Deborah A. King;Yeates Conwell;Christopher Cox;Robin E. Henderson

  • Cerebrovascular Risk Factors and 1-Year Depression Outcome in Older Primary Care Patients

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;Deborah A. King;Yeates Conwell;Christopher Cox

  • Reconsidering Depression in the Elderly.

    Eric D. Caine;Jeffrey M. Lyness;Deborah A. King

  • Cerebrovascular risk factors and later-life major depression. Testing a small-vessel brain disease model.

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;Eric D. Caine;Christopher Cox;Deborah A. King

  • Does perceived burdensomeness erode meaning in life among older adults

    Kimberly A. Van Orden;Patricia M. Bamonti;Deborah A. King;Paul R. Duberstein

  • Trait Neuroticism, Depression, and Cognitive Function in Older Primary Care Patients

    Lisa L. Boyle;Jeffrey M. Lyness;Paul R. Duberstein;Jurgis Karuza

  • Sex differences in subclinical depression: administration of the Beck Depression Inventory in public and private disclosure situations.

    Deborah A. King;Alexander M. Buchwald

  • Working with families in palliative care: one size does not fit all.

    Deborah A. King;Timothy Quill

  • Adapting Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Older Adults at Risk for Suicide

    Marnin J. Heisel;Marnin J. Heisel;Marnin J. Heisel;Nancy L. Talbot;Deborah A. King;Xin M. Tu

  • Adapting Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Older Adults at Risk for Suicide: Preliminary Findings

    Marnin J. Heisel;Paul R. Duberstein;Nancy L. Talbot;Deborah A. King

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey M. Lyness
Jeffrey M. Lyness University of Rochester Medical Center
Eric D. Caine
Eric D. Caine University of Rochester Medical Center
Yeates Conwell
Yeates Conwell University of Rochester Medical Center
Christopher Cox
Christopher Cox Johns Hopkins University
Paul R. Duberstein
Paul R. Duberstein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Marnin J. Heisel
Marnin J. Heisel University of Western Ontario
Kimberly A. Van Orden
Kimberly A. Van Orden University of Rochester Medical Center
Silvia Sörensen
Silvia Sörensen University of Rochester
Cleveland G. Shields
Cleveland G. Shields Purdue University West Lafayette
William Timberlake
William Timberlake Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a world of opportunities for individuals seeking flexibility and affordability in their education. Many accredited universities across the USA now offer programs designed for working adults and remote learners. Accessible coursework allows you to balance your studies with personal and professional commitments while advancing your career.

Choosing the right online program means considering both quality and cost. Those interested in earning a graduate degree should explore affordable online psychology master's degrees in New York or compare to affordable online psychology master's programs in Texas, which frequently top national lists for value and flexibility. If you’re just starting out, look into cheapest online psychology programs in Pennsylvania or explore programs at all degree levels with affordable online psychology degrees in Texas.

Graduates can pursue diverse career pathways including clinical practice, counseling, education, human resources, and research roles. Online psychology degrees can be a springboard for further study at the doctoral level, or for immediate entry into a rapidly growing job market that values qualified mental health professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Deborah A. King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles