World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
24445
World Ranking
7680
National Ranking
4108

Silvia Sörensen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvia Sörensen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 124 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Silvia Sörensen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvia Sörensen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Silvia Sörensen is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States. Their primary field of study is Social Sciences, with a focus on General Health Professions, Health, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, and Economics and Econometrics. Their research addresses complex issues related to aging, health disparities, and caregiving dynamics.

Their work covers multiple key topics, including:

  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health, psychology, and well-being
  • FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

Frequently publishing in venues such as Innovation in Aging, Journal of Medical Internet Research, The Gerontologist, PsycTESTS Dataset, and Journal of Elder Policy, Sörensen has contributed to advancing knowledge in aging, health policy, and social sciences.

Recent publications include:

  • "Perspectives on Aging-Related Preparation," 2021, Journal of Elder Policy
  • "The Success of Cancer Crowdfunding Campaigns: Project and Text Analysis," 2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Adaptation and Validation of the Preparation for Future Care Needs Scale for Chinese Older Adults in Hong Kong," 2021, The Gerontologist
  • "Investigating Racial Disparities in Cancer Crowdfunding: A Comprehensive Study of Medical GoFundMe Campaigns," 2023, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Recruiting Socially Disconnected Latinos Caring for a Person with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned," 2023, Clinical Gerontologist

Among frequent collaborators are Maria M Quiñones-Cordero, Jamil M. Lane, Kathi L. Heffner, Alexander Eustice-Corwin, and Xue Bai. These coauthors indicate interdisciplinary teamwork spanning clinical psychology, gerontology, and social sciences.

In 2014, Silvia Sörensen was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA), an acknowledgment that aligns with their sustained engagement in psychological and gerontological research.

Best Publications

  • Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis.

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life : A meta-analysis

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • How Effective Are Interventions With Caregivers? An Updated Meta-Analysis

    Silvia Sörensen;Martin Pinquart;Paul Duberstein

  • Gender Differences in Caregiver Stressors, Social Resources, and Health: An Updated Meta-Analysis

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • Correlates of Physical Health of Informal Caregivers: A Meta-Analysis

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • Associations of Stressors and Uplifts of Caregiving With Caregiver Burden and Depressive Mood: A Meta-Analysis

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis.

    Unknown

  • Influences on Loneliness in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sorensen

  • Helping caregivers of persons with dementia: which interventions work and how large are their effects?

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • Ethnic Differences in Stressors, Resources, and Psychological Outcomes of Family Caregiving: A Meta-Analysis

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: a meta-analytic comparison.

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • Gender Differences in Self-Concept and Psychological Well-Being in Old Age A Meta-Analysis

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • Influences on Loneliness in Older Adults: A Meta-Analysis

    Unknown

  • Dementia care: mental health effects, intervention strategies, and clinical implications

    Silvia Sörensen;Paul Duberstein;David Gill;Martin Pinquart

  • Associations of caregiver stressors and uplifts with subjective well-being and depressive mood: a meta-analytic comparison.

    M Pinquart;S Sörensen

  • Gender differences in Five Factor Model personality traits in an elderly cohort

    Benjamin P. Chapman;Paul R. Duberstein;Silvia Sörensen;Jeffrey M. Lyness

  • Issues in dementia caregiving: effects on mental and physical health, intervention strategies, and research needs.

    Silvia Sörensen;Yeates Conwell

  • Risk factors for loneliness in adulthood and old age--a meta-analysis.

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

  • Levels of depressive symptoms in spouses of people with lung cancer: effects of personality, social support, and caregiving burden.

    Youngmee Kim;Youngmee Kim;Paul R. Duberstein;Paul R. Duberstein;Silvia Sörensen;Silvia Sörensen;Mark R. Larson;Mark R. Larson

  • Racial and ethnic differences in the relationship of caregiving stressors, resources, and sociodemographic variables to caregiver depression and perceived physical health

    Silvia Sörensen;Martin Pinquart

  • Personality is associated with perceived health and functional status in older primary care patients.

    Paul R Duberstein;Silvia Sörensen;Jeffrey M Lyness;Deborah A King

  • How effective are psychotherapeutic and other psychosocial interventions with older adults? A meta-analysis.

    Martin Pinquart;Silvia Sörensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul R. Duberstein
Paul R. Duberstein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jeffrey M. Lyness
Jeffrey M. Lyness University of Rochester Medical Center
Martin Pinquart
Martin Pinquart Philipp University of Marburg
Benjamin P. Chapman
Benjamin P. Chapman University of Rochester Medical Center
Lori A. Roggman
Lori A. Roggman Utah State University
Yeates Conwell
Yeates Conwell University of Rochester Medical Center
Jameson K. Hirsch
Jameson K. Hirsch East Tennessee State University
Deborah A. King
Deborah A. King University of Rochester Medical Center
Rebecca S. Allen
Rebecca S. Allen University of Alabama
Youngmee Kim
Youngmee Kim University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree programs and specialized career paths. Many students begin by researching accredited counseling degrees, as these can set the foundation for roles in mental health, school counseling, or therapy. Convenient online options now make it easier than ever to earn a quality education while balancing other commitments.

Prospective students often compare programs by region to make the best choice. For example, the top counseling degree programs in Michigan provide comprehensive coursework and practical experience, while the best college counseling programs in the Midwest are known for their blend of flexibility and academic rigor.

If you’re considering specific states, there are robust Minnesota counseling degree programs as well as highly rated top counseling degree programs in Mississippi. Graduates from these programs are well-equipped to pursue careers in community agencies, private practice, education, or corporate wellness.

As you navigate your educational journey, researching regional program features and career outcomes can help you select the path that best aligns with your personal goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Silvia Sörensen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles