World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
34246
World Ranking
7431
National Ranking
3886

Yeates Conwell publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yeates Conwell sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 428 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Yeates Conwell D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yeates Conwell sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yeates Conwell is affiliated with the University of Rochester Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans across medicine and psychology, with a particular focus on clinical psychology, general health professions, social psychology, health, and psychiatry and mental health. Conwell's work frequently addresses complex topics related to suicide and self-harm studies, health disparities and outcomes, mental health treatment and access, pharmaceutical practices and patient outcomes, dementia and cognitive impairment research, geriatric care and nursing homes, as well as health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

Several journals serve as common venues for Conwell's publications, including:

  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Among recent papers connected to their research interests, notable examples include:

  • Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis, 2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • Strategies to Promote Social Connections Among Older Adults During "Social Distancing" Restrictions, 2020, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Emotional Well-Being: What It Is and Why It Matters, 2022, Affective Science
  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis, 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Association Between Neurological Disorders and Death by Suicide in Denmark, 2020, JAMA

Yeates Conwell has collaborated frequently with several researchers in related fields. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Liat Ayalon
  • Jinjiao Wang
  • Thomas V. Caprio
  • Fang Yu
  • Alastair J. Flint

Their contributions underline a continuous engagement with research communities focused on geriatric psychiatry, psychological health, and medical aspects of aging and mental health disorders. The multidisciplinary approach integrates clinical findings with broader social and health system perspectives, addressing critical issues such as suicide prevention, mental health treatment accessibility, and aging populations' well-being.

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression in Late Life: Consensus Statement Update

    Barry D. Lebowitz;Jane L. Pearson;Lon S. Schneider;Charles F. Reynolds

  • Relationships of Age and Axis I Diagnoses in Victims of Completed Suicide: A Psychological Autopsy Study

    Yeates Conwell;Paul R. Duberstein;Christopher Cox;John H. Herrmann

  • Risk factors for suicide in later life

    Yeates Conwell;Paul R. Duberstein;Eric D. Caine

  • Screening for Depression in Elderly Primary Care Patients: A Comparison of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies—Depression Scale and the Geriatric Depression Scale

    Jeffrey M. Lyness;Tamson Kelly Noel;Christopher Cox;Deborah A. King

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression in Late Life

    Arnold J. Friedhoff;James Ballenger;Alan S. Bellack;William T. Carpenter

  • Suicide in Older Adults

    Yeates Conwell;Kimberly A. Van Orden;Eric D. Caine

  • Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance consensus statement on the unmet needs in diagnosis and treatment of mood disorders in late life.

    Dennis S. Charney;Charles F. Reynolds;Lydia Lewis;Barry D. Lebowitz

  • Risk Factors for Late-Life Suicide: A Prospective, Community-Based Study

    Carolyn L. Turvey;Yeates Conwell;Michael P. Jones;Caroline Phillips

  • Four studies on how past and current suicidality relate even when "everything but the kitchen sink" is covaried.

    Thomas E. Joiner Jr.;Yeates Conwell;Kathleen Kara Fitzpatrick;Tracy K. Witte

  • Validation of a Measure of Physical Illness Burden at Autopsy: The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale

    Yeates Conwell;Nicholas T. Forbes;Christopher Cox;Eric D. Caine

  • A Systematic Review of Elderly Suicide Prevention Programs

    Sylvie Lapierre;Annette Erlangsen;Margda Waern;Diego De Leo

  • Method Choice, Intent, and Gender in Completed Suicide

    Diane G. Denning;Yeates Conwell;Deborah King;Chris Cox

  • Suicidal Behavior in Elders

    Yeates Conwell;Catherine Thompson

  • Age Differences in Behaviors Leading to Completed Suicide

    Yeates Conwell;Paul R. Duberstein;Christopher Cox;John Herrmann

  • Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire 2 (PHQ‐2) in Identifying Major Depression in Older People

    Chunyu Li;Bruce Friedman;Yeates Conwell;Kevin Fiscella

  • Suicide and aging. I: Patterns of psychiatric diagnosis.

    Yeates Conwell;David Brent

  • Psychological vulnerability to completed suicide: a review of empirical studies

    Kenneth R. Conner;Paul R. Duberstein;Yeates Conwell;Larry Seidlitz

  • Completed suicide among older patients in primary care practices: a controlled study

    Yeates Conwell;Jeffrey M. Lyness;Paul Duberstein;Christopher Cox

  • If suicide is a public health problem, what are we doing to prevent it?

    Kerry L. Knox;Yeates Conwell;Eric D. Caine

  • Suicide at 50 years of age and older: perceived physical illness, family discord and financial strain.

    P. R. Duberstein;Yeates Conwell;Kenneth R. Conner;S. Eberly

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul R. Duberstein
Paul R. Duberstein Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Eric D. Caine
Eric D. Caine University of Rochester Medical Center
Kenneth R. Conner
Kenneth R. Conner University of Rochester Medical Center
Christopher Cox
Christopher Cox Johns Hopkins University
Kimberly A. Van Orden
Kimberly A. Van Orden University of Rochester Medical Center
Jeffrey M. Lyness
Jeffrey M. Lyness University of Rochester Medical Center
Mao-Sheng Ran
Mao-Sheng Ran University of Hong Kong
Deborah A. King
Deborah A. King University of Rochester Medical Center
Helen F.K. Chiu
Helen F.K. Chiu Chinese University of Hong Kong
Marnin J. Heisel
Marnin J. Heisel University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA opens doors to a range of online nursing degrees and career advancements. For those seeking cost-effective routes into healthcare, cheap online nursing programs provide accessible options to start or further a nursing career without a significant financial burden.

Many registered nurses are interested in elevating their credentials. The average cost of rn to bsn programs is a key consideration, as it varies widely across institutions. Comparing programs can help you find one that meets both your educational and budget needs.

For experienced nurses aiming for leadership or academic roles, pursuing the cheapest phd nursing programs allows for doctoral-level study at a more manageable price. These online options fit diverse schedules while advancing expertise.

Additionally, if you have a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, you can still transition to another healthcare pathway. Consider exploring non nursing bachelor's to msn online programs, designed for career changers eager to become registered nurses via a Master’s-level route.

Best Scientists Citing Yeates Conwell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles