World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ilona Papousek

Ilona Papousek

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7657 7143 36 35 170 5769

Ilona Papousek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ilona Papousek between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ilona Papousek published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2014. 3 of the 189 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2014. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
1992 2025

189 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ilona Papousek: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 0
2001 1
2002 4
2003 0
2004 1
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 3
2009 3
2010 5
2011 10
2012 9
2013 9
2014 21
2015 10
2016 7
2017 21
2018 18
2019 20
2020 11
2021 14
2022 8
2023 4
2024 1
2025 2
Total 189
Download as CSV

Ilona Papousek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilona Papousek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 170 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 170
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ilona Papousek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilona Papousek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ilona Papousek is affiliated with the University of Graz in Austria. Their research primarily encompasses the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a strong emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology. Other notable subfields include cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, social psychology, and clinical psychology.

The main topics of their work cover creativity in education and neuroscience, sport psychology and performance, mind wandering and attention, neural and behavioral psychology studies, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, language, metaphor, and cognition, as well as humor studies and applications.

Their most frequent publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Scientific Reports
  • Sensors
  • Behavioral Sciences

Ilona Papousek has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Andréas Fink
  • Corinna M. Perchtold-Stefan
  • Christian Rominger
  • Elisabeth M. Weiss
  • Helmut Lackner

Some recent papers authored or coauthored by Ilona Papousek include:

  • Creative, Antagonistic, and Angry? Exploring the Roots of Malevolent Creativity with a Real-World Idea Generation Task (2020, The Journal of Creative Behavior)
  • More habitual physical activity is linked to the use of specific, more adaptive cognitive reappraisal strategies in dealing with stressful events (2020, Stress and Health)
  • Humor comprehension and creative cognition: Shared and distinct neurocognitive mechanisms as indicated by EEG alpha activity (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Functional brain activation patterns of creative metacognitive monitoring (2022, Neuropsychologia)
  • Failure to reappraise: Malevolent creativity is linked to revenge ideation and impaired reappraisal inventiveness in the face of stressful, anger-eliciting events (2021, Anxiety Stress & Coping)

Best Publications

  • Statistics anxiety, trait anxiety, learning behavior, and academic performance

    Daniel Macher;Manuela Paechter;Ilona Papousek;Kai Ruggeri

  • Statistics anxiety, state anxiety during an examination, and academic achievement.

    Daniel Macher;Manuela Paechter;Ilona Papousek;Kai Ruggeri

  • Mathematics Anxiety and Statistics Anxiety. Shared but Also Unshared Components and Antagonistic Contributions to Performance in Statistics

    Manuela Paechter;Daniel Macher;Khatuna Martskvishvili;Sigrid Wimmer

  • Trait and state positive affect and cardiovascular recovery from experimental academic stress.

    Ilona Papousek;Karin Nauschnegg;Manuela Paechter;Helmut K. Lackner

  • The time-course of EEG Alpha Power Changes in Creative Ideation

    Daniela Schwab;Mathias Benedek;Ilona Papousek;Elisabeth M. Weiss

  • Creativity and the Stroop interference effect

    Susanne Edl;Mathias Benedek;Ilona Papousek;Elisabeth M. Weiss

  • Sensitivity of EEG upper alpha activity to cognitive and affective creativity interventions.

    Andreas Fink;Daniela Schwab;Ilona Papousek

  • Creativity and schizotypy from the neuroscience perspective

    Andreas Fink;Bernhard Weber;Karl Koschutnig;Mathias Benedek

  • Gray matter density in relation to different facets of verbal creativity

    Andreas Fink;Karl Koschutnig;Lisa Hutterer;Elisabeth Steiner

  • Psychometric Evaluation and Experimental Validation of the Statistics Anxiety Rating Scale

    Ilona Papousek;Kai Ruggeri;Daniel Macher;Manuela Paechter

  • The creative brain in the figural domain: Distinct patterns of EEG alpha power during idea generation and idea elaboration.

    Christian Rominger;Ilona Papousek;Corinna M. Perchtold;Bernhard Weber

  • Covariations of EEG asymmetries and emotional states indicate that activity at frontopolar locations is particularly affected by state factors.

    Ilona Papousek;Günter Schulter

  • Frontal brain asymmetry and affective flexibility in an emotional contagion paradigm

    Ilona Papousek;Eva M. Reiser;Bernhard Weber;H. Harald Freudenthaler

  • Prefrontal EEG alpha asymmetry changes while observing disaster happening to other people: cardiac correlates and prediction of emotional impact

    Ilona Papousek;Elisabeth M. Weiss;Günter Schulter;Andreas Fink

  • Training of Verbal Creativity Modulates Brain Activity in Regions Associated with language- and memory-Related Demands

    Andreas Fink;Mathias Benedek;Karl Koschutnig;Eva Pirker

  • Gelotophobia, emotion-related skills and responses to the affective states of others

    Ilona Papousek;Willibald Ruch;H. Harald Freudenthaler;Eva Kogler

  • EEG alpha activity during imagining creative moves in soccer decision-making situations.

    Andreas Fink;Christian Rominger;Mathias Benedek;Corinna M. Perchtold

  • Creativity is associated with a characteristic U-shaped function of alpha power changes accompanied by an early increase in functional coupling

    Christian Rominger;Ilona Papousek;Corinna M Perchtold;Mathias Benedek

  • Phase synchronization of hemodynamic variables and respiration during mental challenge

    Helmut Karl Lackner;Helmut Karl Lackner;Ilona Papousek;Jerry Joseph Batzel;Andreas Roessler

  • Typical performance measures of emotion regulation and emotion perception and frontal EEG asymmetry in an emotional contagion paradigm

    Ilona Papousek;H. Harald Freudenthaler;Günter Schulter

  • Potential markers of aggressive behavior: the fear of other persons' laughter and its overlaps with mental disorders.

    Elisabeth M. Weiss;Günter Schulter;H. Harald Freudenthaler;Ellen Hofer

Frequent Co-Authors

Elisabeth M. Weiss
Elisabeth M. Weiss University of Innsbruck
Andreas Fink
Andreas Fink University of Graz
Karl Koschutnig
Karl Koschutnig University of Graz
Mathias Benedek
Mathias Benedek University of Graz
Andrea Christiane Samson
Andrea Christiane Samson University of Fribourg
Walther Parson
Walther Parson Innsbruck Medical University
Daniel Memmert
Daniel Memmert German Sport University Cologne
Daniela Jezova
Daniela Jezova Slovak Academy of Sciences
Ulrich S. Tran
Ulrich S. Tran University of Vienna
Willibald Ruch
Willibald Ruch University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open doors to a variety of online degree options and career paths. When considering advanced studies, affordability and accreditation are key factors. For those interested in behavior analysis, cheap accredited online bcba programs provide a flexible way to specialize in applied behavior analysis with less financial strain.

If your goal is to become a licensed psychologist, there are cheapest clinical psychology masters programs online that can make earning your degree more accessible. For those seeking the highest academic credentials, consider the cheapest online doctor of psychology programs, often tailored for working professionals.

Leadership roles in behavioral health are also in high demand. Pursuing an affordable doctorate in behavioral health leadership can prepare you to influence policy, manage organizations, or drive innovation in mental health care. Exploring these pathways ensures you can tailor your education to your career ambitions while managing costs effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Ilona Papousek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles