World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3382 3117 1911 1722 161 14086

Roger E. Beaty publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roger E. Beaty between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roger E. Beaty published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2025. 73 of the 245 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2025. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 47 publications
2009 2025

245 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roger E. Beaty: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 4
2013 8
2014 14
2015 6
2016 9
2017 8
2018 16
2019 17
2020 12
2021 23
2022 18
2023 36
2024 26
2025 47
Total 245
Download as CSV

Roger E. Beaty publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger E. Beaty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 161 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 161
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Roger E. Beaty D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roger E. Beaty sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Roger E. Beaty is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a significant focus on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience. These areas encompass investigations into various cognitive processes underlying creativity and brain function.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Mind wandering and attention
  • Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Roger E. Beaty has contributed to several recent academic papers such as:

  • Automating creativity assessment with SemDis: An open platform for computing semantic distance (2020), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • Associative thinking at the core of creativity (2023), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • The role of memory in creative ideation (2023), published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Creativity in the age of generative AI (2023), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • The Process Definition of Creativity (2023), published in Creativity Research Journal

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Beaty include:

  • Yoed N. Kenett
  • Simone A Luchini
  • Mathias Benedek
  • Qunlin Chen
  • Daniel C. Zeitlen

Publications are often found in notable venues such as:

  • Creativity Research Journal
  • Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts
  • Thinking Skills and Creativity
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • NeuroImage

The scientist's work encompasses a substantial number of papers in psychology (124) and neuroscience (101), with particularly strong representation in subfields that address experimental and cognitive psychology (103 papers) and cognitive neuroscience (99 papers). Their research integrates cognitive processes and neural mechanisms relevant to creative thought, education, and brain connectivity.

Best Publications

  • Creative Cognition and Brain Network Dynamics

    Roger E. Beaty;Mathias Benedek;Paul J. Silvia;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity

    Roger E. Beaty;Yoed N. Kenett;Alexander P. Christensen;Monica D. Rosenberg

  • Default and Executive Network Coupling Supports Creative Idea Production

    Roger E. Beaty;Mathias Benedek;Scott Barry Kaufman;Paul J. Silvia

  • Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks.

    Roger E. Beaty;Paul E. Silvia

  • Creativity and the default network: A functional connectivity analysis of the creative brain at rest.

    Roger E. Beaty;Mathias Benedek;Robin W. Wilkins;Emanuel Jauk

  • The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition

    Roger E. Beaty;Paul J. Silvia;Emily C. Nusbaum;Emanuel Jauk

  • Openness to experience and awe in response to nature and music: Personality and profound aesthetic experiences.

    Paul J. Silvia;Kirill Fayn;Emily C. Nusbaum;Roger E. Beaty

  • Creating metaphors: the neural basis of figurative language production.

    Mathias Benedek;Roger E. Beaty;Emanuel Jauk;Karl Koschutnig

  • Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought

    Paul J. Silvia;Roger E. Beaty

  • The neuroscience of musical improvisation

    Roger E. Beaty

  • Everyday Creativity in Daily Life: An Experience-sampling Study of “little c” Creativity

    Paul J. Silvia;Roger E. Beaty;Emily C. Nusbaum;Kari M. Eddington

  • Verbal fluency and creativity: General and specific contributions of broad retrieval ability (Gr) factors to divergent thinking

    Paul J. Silvia;Roger E. Beaty;Emily C. Nusbaum

  • Ready, Set, Create: What Instructing People to "Be Creative" Reveals About the Meaning and Mechanisms of Divergent Thinking

    Emily C. Nusbaum;Paul J. Silvia;Roger E. Beaty

  • Metaphorically speaking: Cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language.

    Roger E. Beaty;Paul J. Silvia

  • Network Neuroscience of Creative Cognition: Mapping Cognitive Mechanisms and Individual Differences in the Creative Brain.

    Roger E Beaty;Paul Seli;Daniel L Schacter

  • Creative constraints: Brain activity and network dynamics underlying semantic interference during idea production

    Roger E. Beaty;Alexander P. Christensen;Mathias Benedek;Paul J. Silvia

  • Personality and complex brain networks: The role of openness to experience in default network efficiency.

    Roger E. Beaty;Scott Barry Kaufman;Mathias Benedek;Rex E. Jung

  • Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity?

    Roger E. Beaty;Emily C. Nusbaum;Paul J. Silvia

  • Gritty People Try Harder: Grit and Effort-related Cardiac Autonomic Activity during an Active Coping Challenge

    Paul J. Silvia;Kari M. Eddington;Roger E. Beaty;Emily C. Nusbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul J. Silvia
Paul J. Silvia University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Mathias Benedek
Mathias Benedek University of Graz
Jiang Qiu
Jiang Qiu Southwest University
Daniel L. Schacter
Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University
Yoed N. Kenett
Yoed N. Kenett Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Thomas R. Kwapil
Thomas R. Kwapil University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Paul Seli
Paul Seli Duke University
Andreas Fink
Andreas Fink University of Graz
Emanuel Jauk
Emanuel Jauk TU Dresden
Aljoscha C. Neubauer
Aljoscha C. Neubauer University of Graz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to various related online degrees and professional pathways. Many students consider careers in counseling, social work, or mental health services. To become a licensed professional counselor (LPC) in the USA, specific educational and licensure requirements must be met, which can vary significantly between states.

For example, aspiring counselors should familiarize themselves with the lpc license requirements in Alaska and the lpc licensure requirements in Arizona to understand regional regulations. Additionally, reviewing the lpc license requirements in Arkansas or the lpc license requirements in California highlights differences in supervised practice hours, accredited degree programs, and required examinations.

Online degree programs can provide flexible study options as you work toward meeting these prerequisites, making it easier to balance professional and personal commitments. By understanding state-specific guidance early, you can plan your educational journey efficiently and prepare for a rewarding career in the field of mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Roger E. Beaty

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles