World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 69 2367 2160 1378 1230 309 18212

Thomas R. Kwapil publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas R. Kwapil between 1990 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas R. Kwapil published across 36 years, from 1990 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2014. 24 of the 331 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2014. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 12 publications
1990 2025

331 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas R. Kwapil: publications per year, 1990 to 2025
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 3
1994 2
1995 1
1996 2
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 6
2001 0
2002 4
2003 3
2004 3
2005 2
2006 2
2007 10
2008 7
2009 7
2010 15
2011 9
2012 20
2013 15
2014 34
2015 17
2016 9
2017 13
2018 25
2019 11
2020 26
2021 29
2022 11
2023 12
2024 12
2025 12
Total 331
Download as CSV

Thomas R. Kwapil publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Kwapil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 309 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 309
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas R. Kwapil D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Kwapil sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 69
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas R. Kwapil is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a strong focus on psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and philosophy.

The main topics explored in their work include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental health research topics
  • Mental health and psychiatry
  • Child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development
  • Personality disorders and psychopathology
  • Digital mental health interventions
  • Bipolar disorder and treatment

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas R. Kwapil include:

  • Association of multidimensional schizotypy with psychotic-like experiences, affect, and social functioning in daily life: Comparable findings across samples and schizotypy measures, 2020, Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  • Dysregulated Lipid Metabolism Precedes Onset of Psychosis, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • Positive, Negative, and Disorganized Schizotypy Predict Differential Patterns of Interview-Rated Schizophrenia-Spectrum Symptoms and Impairment, 2020, Assessment
  • Bipolar spectrum psychopathology is associated with altered emotion dynamics across multiple timescales, 2020, Emotion
  • Anterior vs Posterior Hippocampal Subfields in an Extended Psychosis Phenotype of Multidimensional Schizotypy in a Nonclinical Sample, 2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin

The scientist has frequently published in several academic venues, including:

  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment
  • Assessment
  • PLoS ONE

Thomas R. Kwapil often collaborates with other researchers. Their frequent co-authors are:

  • Neus Barrantes-Vidal
  • Manel Monsonet
  • Kathryn C. Kemp
  • Lieuwe de Haan
  • Mark van der Gaag

Best Publications

  • For whom the mind wanders, and when: an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life.

    Michael J. Kane;Leslie H. Brown;Jennifer C. McVay;Paul J. Silvia

  • Putatively psychosis-prone subjects 10 years later.

    Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman;Thomas R. Kwapil;Mark Eckblad

  • Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity

    Roger E. Beaty;Yoed N. Kenett;Alexander P. Christensen;Monica D. Rosenberg

  • Social anhedonia as a predictor of the development of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.

    Thomas R. Kwapil

  • The Dimensional Structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales: Factor Identification and Construct Validity

    Thomas Richard Kwapil;Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Paul J. Silvia

  • A Longitudinal Study of High Scorers on the Hypomanic Personality Scale

    Thomas R. Kwapil;Michael B. Miller;Michael B. Miller;Michael C. Zinser;Michael C. Zinser;Loren J. Chapman

  • Schizotypy: Looking Back and Moving Forward

    Thomas Richard Kwapil;Neus Barrantes-Vidal

  • Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: an experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts.

    Jennifer C. McVay;Michael J. Kane;Thomas R. Kwapil

  • The Role of Schizotypy in the Study of the Etiology of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders

    Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Phillip Grant;Thomas Richard Kwapil

  • When the Need to Belong Goes Wrong: The Expression of Social Anhedonia and Social Anxiety in Daily Life

    Leslie H. Brown;Paul J. Silvia;Inez Myin-Germeys;Thomas Richard Kwapil

  • Identifying Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Contemporary Challenges for Integrated, Large-scale Investigations

    Jim van Os;Jim van Os;Bart P. Rutten;Inez Myin-Germeys;Philippe Delespaul

  • Everyday Creativity in Daily Life: An Experience-sampling Study of “little c” Creativity

    Paul J. Silvia;Roger E. Beaty;Emily C. Nusbaum;Kari M. Eddington

  • Magical ideation and social anhedonia as predictors of psychosis proneness: A partial replication.

    Thomas R. Kwapil;Michael B. Miller;Michael C. Zinser;Jean Chapman

  • Anxiety and depression symptoms in psychometrically identified schizotypy

    Kathryn E. Lewandowski;Neus Barrantes-Vidal;Rosemery O. Nelson-Gray;Carolina Clancy

  • Examination of the reliability and factor structure of the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a non-clinical sample

    R.M. Hurst;J.T. Mitchell;N.A. Kimbrel;T.K. Kwapil

  • Prediction of Psychopathology and Functional Impairment by Positive and Negative Schizotypy in the Chapmans’ Ten-year Longitudinal Study

    Thomas Richard Kwapil;Georgina M. Gross;Paul J. Silvia;Neus Barrantes-Vidal

  • For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When, Varies Across Laboratory and Daily-Life Settings.

    Michael J. Kane;Georgina M. Gross;Charlotte A. Chun;Bridget A. Smeekens

  • Facilitation of word recognition by semantic priming in schizophrenia.

    Thomas R. Kwapil;Douglas C. Hegley;Loren J. Chapman;Jean P. Chapman

  • Individual Differences In The Executive Control Of Attention, Memory, And Thought, And Their Associations With Schizotypy

    Michael J. Kane;Matt E. Meier;Bridget A. Smeekens;Georgina M. Gross

  • From Environment to Therapy in Psychosis: A Real-World Momentary Assessment Approach

    Inez Myin-Germeys;Maximillian Birchwood;Thomas Richard Kwapil

Frequent Co-Authors

Neus Barrantes-Vidal
Neus Barrantes-Vidal Autonomous University of Barcelona
Paul J. Silvia
Paul J. Silvia University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Michael J. Kane
Michael J. Kane University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Vandana Shashi
Vandana Shashi Duke University
Jean P. Chapman
Jean P. Chapman University of Wisconsin–Madison
Loren J. Chapman
Loren J. Chapman University of Wisconsin–Madison
Roger E. Beaty
Roger E. Beaty Pennsylvania State University
Frank Larøi
Frank Larøi University of Oslo
Matcheri S. Keshavan
Matcheri S. Keshavan Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths, including counseling, therapy, research, and mental health advocacy. For those interested in flexible and affordable study options, online degrees in counseling and related fields have become increasingly accessible across the country.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Fortunately, several states offer highly-rated programs at lower costs. Students in Illinois can explore the cheapest counseling degrees in Illinois, while those in Indiana may benefit from affordable counseling degrees in Indiana. Similarly, aspiring counselors in California can consider affordable counseling programs in Los Angeles.

If you are based in Michigan or looking to study there, make sure to review the cheapest counseling programs in Michigan for additional cost-saving opportunities.

Before enrolling, compare tuition rates, program accreditation, and online flexibility to ensure your education aligns with your budget and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas R. Kwapil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles