World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frank Larøi

Frank Larøi

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
8840
World Ranking
6412
National Ranking
49

Frank Larøi publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Larøi sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 273 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Frank Larøi D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Larøi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Cognition
  • Schizophrenia
  • Mental illness

Cognition, Psychosis, Clinical psychology, Developmental psychology and Cognitive psychology are his primary areas of study. In the subject of general Cognition, his work in Metacognition is often linked to Path analysis, thereby combining diverse domains of study. His Psychosis research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Psychotherapist, Schizophrenia, Neuroimaging and Dementia.

His Clinical psychology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Big Five personality traits, Intraclass correlation and Schizotypy. His study in the field of Psychometrics is also linked to topics like Test validity. His Cognitive psychology research includes themes of Cognitive therapy and Perception.

His most cited work include:

  • The hallucinating brain: a review of structural and functional neuroimaging studies of hallucinations. (378 citations)
  • Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia and Nonschizophrenia Populations: A Review and Integrated Model of Cognitive Mechanisms (242 citations)
  • The Characteristic Features of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Clinical and Nonclinical Groups: State-of-the-Art Overview and Future Directions (177 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Frank Larøi mostly deals with Clinical psychology, Cognition, Cognitive psychology, Psychosis and Psychiatry. His Clinical psychology research incorporates elements of Schizophrenia, Schizotypy, Confirmatory factor analysis, Schizophrenia and Mental health. His research integrates issues of Intervention and Apathy in his study of Schizophrenia.

The concepts of his Cognition study are interwoven with issues in Developmental psychology, Affect, Perception and Psychological intervention. His Cognitive psychology study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Social psychology. His studies in Psychosis integrate themes in fields like Psychotherapist, Phenomenology and Audiology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Clinical psychology (59.11%)
  • Cognition (39.86%)
  • Cognitive psychology (32.30%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Psychosis (36.43%)
  • Clinical psychology (59.11%)
  • Cognitive psychology (32.30%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Frank Larøi spends much of his time researching Psychosis, Clinical psychology, Cognitive psychology, Audiology and Mental health. Frank Larøi interconnects Adverse Childhood Experiences and Sensory deprivation in the investigation of issues within Psychosis. His Clinical psychology study combines topics in areas such as Schizophrenia, Perception, Intervention, Apathy and Epilepsy.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Schizophrenia, Empirical evidence and Cognition. His study looks at the intersection of Cognition and topics like Psychological intervention with Distress. His research in Mental health intersects with topics in Loneliness and Activities of daily living.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Beyond Trauma: A Multiple Pathways Approach to Auditory Hallucinations in Clinical and Nonclinical Populations. (26 citations)
  • Beyond Trauma: A Multiple Pathways Approach to Auditory Hallucinations in Clinical and Nonclinical Populations. (26 citations)
  • Beyond Trauma: A Multiple Pathways Approach to Auditory Hallucinations in Clinical and Nonclinical Populations. (26 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Cognition
  • Schizophrenia
  • Social psychology

His primary areas of study are Mental health, Clinical psychology, Cognitive psychology, Psychosis and Visual Hallucination. The study incorporates disciplines such as mHealth, Intervention and Applied psychology in addition to Mental health. His Clinical psychology research incorporates themes from Confirmatory factor analysis, Measurement invariance and Perception.

Frank Larøi has researched Cognitive psychology in several fields, including Empirical evidence, Prospective memory and Psychological research. Frank Larøi has included themes like Sensory deprivation, Adverse Childhood Experiences, Etiology and Epilepsy in his Psychosis study. The Visual Hallucination study combines topics in areas such as Stimulus modality and Anxiety.

Best Publications

  • The hallucinating brain: a review of structural and functional neuroimaging studies of hallucinations.

    Paul Allen;Frank Laroi;Philip K. McGuire;Andre Aleman

  • Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenia and Nonschizophrenia Populations: A Review and Integrated Model of Cognitive Mechanisms

    Flavie Waters;Paul Allen;Andre Aleman;Charles Fernyhough

  • Visual Hallucinations in the Psychosis Spectrum and Comparative Information From Neurodegenerative Disorders and Eye Disease

    Flavie Waters;Daniel Collerton;Dominique H. ffytche;Renaud Jardri

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations in persons with and without a need for care

    Louise C. Johns;Kristiina Kompus;Melissa Connell;Clara Humpston

  • Hallucinations: The Science of Idiosyncratic Perception

    André Aleman;Frank Laroi

  • The Characteristic Features of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations in Clinical and Nonclinical Groups: State-of-the-Art Overview and Future Directions

    Frank Laroi;Iris E. Sommer;Jan Dirk Blom;Charles Fernyhough

  • Culture and Hallucinations: Overview and Future Directions

    Frank Larøi;Tanya Marie Luhrmann;Vaughan Bell;William A. Christian

  • Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) : psychometric properties of the French translation and exploration of its relations with emotion regulation strategies

    Françoise Jermann;Joël Billieux;Frank Larøi;Arnaud d'Argembeau

  • A French adaptation of the UPPS Impulsive Behavior Scale: Confirmatory factor analysis in a sample of undergraduate students

    Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden;Mathieu d'Acremont;Ariane Zermatten;Françoise Jermann

  • Emotional processing in a non-clinical psychosis-prone sample.

    Mascha van 't Wout;André Aleman;Roy P.C Kessels;Frank Larøi

  • Unawareness of illness in chronic schizophrenia and its relationship to structural brain measures and neuropsychological tests

    Frank Larøi;Madeleine Fannemel;Unni Rønneberg;Kjell Flekkøy

  • Nonclinical Participants' Reports of Hallucinatory Experiences

    Frank Laroi;Martial Van der Linden

  • Metacognitions in proneness towards hallucinations and delusions.

    F. Larøi;M. Van der Linden;M. Van der Linden

  • The structure of schizotypal personality traits: a cross-national study

    E. Fonseca-Pedrero;Martin Debbané;Martin Debbané;J. Ortuño-Sierra;R. C. K. Chan

  • Further evidence of the multi-dimensionality of hallucinatory predisposition: factor structure of a modified version of the Launay-Slade Hallucinations Scale in a normal sample

    Frank Larøi;Philippe Marczewski;Martial Van der Linden

  • The effects of emotional salience, cognitive effort and meta-cognitive beliefs on a reality monitoring task in hallucination-prone subjects

    Frank Laroi;Martial Van der Linden;Martial Van der Linden;P. Marczewski

  • Which psychological factors influence Internet addiction? Evidence through an integrative model

    Jonathan Burnay;Joël Billieux;Sylvie Blairy;Frank Larøi

  • Differences and similarities in the sensory and cognitive signatures of voice-hearing, intrusions and thoughts

    Steffen Moritz;Frank Larøi

  • Prevalence of auditory verbal hallucinations in a general population: A group comparison study

    Bodil Kråkvik;Frank Larøi;Frank Larøi;Anne Martha Kalhovde;Kenneth Hugdahl

  • How do auditory verbal hallucinations in patients differ from those in non-patients?

    Frank Larøi

  • Hallucinations from a cognitive perspective.

    Frank Larøi;Todd S. Woodward

Frequent Co-Authors

Martial Van der Linden
Martial Van der Linden University of Geneva
Andrea Raballo
Andrea Raballo University of Perugia
Kenneth Hugdahl
Kenneth Hugdahl University of Bergen
Mohamad El Haj
Mohamad El Haj University of Nantes
Johanna C. Badcock
Johanna C. Badcock University of Western Australia
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
André Aleman
André Aleman University Medical Center Groningen
Renaud Jardri
Renaud Jardri University of Lille
Charles Fernyhough
Charles Fernyhough Durham University
Antonio Preti
Antonio Preti University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways. Many graduates choose to further their education online, earning advanced degrees in counseling or mental health services. These programs can prepare you for important roles such as a licensed mental health counselor.

However, it's crucial to understand that mental health counselor requirements vary by location. For example, Chesapeake mental health counselor certification requirements differ from those in other regions. In Illinois, Chicago mental health counselor education requirements outline specific courses and supervised fieldwork.

Similarly, candidates must review mental health counselor requirements in Chula Vista and mental health counselor requirements in Cincinnati to ensure they meet local standards. Before enrolling in an online program, review your state or city’s specific licensing requirements to guide your academic and career decisions.

Exploring these pathways can help you choose the right program and build a successful career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Larøi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles