World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tania M. Lincoln

Tania M. Lincoln

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4225 3904 192 189 292 11602

Tania M. Lincoln publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tania M. Lincoln between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tania M. Lincoln published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 16.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2021. 51 of the 375 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 38 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 17 publications
2003 2025

375 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tania M. Lincoln: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 4
2008 5
2009 8
2010 17
2011 9
2012 10
2013 10
2014 23
2015 22
2016 25
2017 38
2018 27
2019 14
2020 22
2021 40
2022 22
2023 22
2024 34
2025 17
Total 375
Download as CSV

Tania M. Lincoln publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tania M. Lincoln sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 292 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113 292
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tania M. Lincoln D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tania M. Lincoln sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tania M. Lincoln is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany and specializes in psychology and medicine with a primary focus in experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and social psychology. Their research output includes a significant number of publications addressing various aspects of mental health and psychological processes.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • The role of emotion regulation in the characterization, development and treatment of psychopathology, 2022, Nature Reviews Psychology
  • Taking a machine learning approach to optimize prediction of vaccine hesitancy in high income countries, 2022, Scientific Reports

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Lincoln include:

  • Björn Schlier
  • Katarina Krkovic
  • Matthias Pillny
  • Brandon A. Gaudiano
  • Suzanne Ho-wai So

Lincoln's work appears consistently in several prominent publication venues such as:

  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

The main research fields Lincoln contributes to include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

The subfields of study they focus on are:

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology

The core topics of Lincoln's research encompass:

  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access

In addition to research articles, Lincoln has contributed to advancing the understanding of emotion regulation mechanisms, mental health assessment, and treatment approaches. Their interdisciplinary work integrates cognitive, clinical, and social psychological perspectives, offering insights into complex psychiatric conditions and mental health challenges.

Best Publications

  • Correlates and Long-Term Consequences of Poor Insight in Patients With Schizophrenia. A Systematic Review

    Tania M. Lincoln;Eva Lüllmann;Winfried Rief

  • Effectiveness of psychoeducation for relapse, symptoms, knowledge, adherence and functioning in psychotic disorders: a meta-analysis.

    Tania Lincoln;K Wilhelm;Yvonne Nestoriuc

  • Auditory verbal hallucinations in persons with and without a need for care

    Louise C. Johns;Kristiina Kompus;Melissa Connell;Clara Humpston

  • Can Antistigma Campaigns Be Improved? A Test of the Impact of Biogenetic Vs Psychosocial Causal Explanations on Implicit and Explicit Attitudes to Schizophrenia

    Tania M. Lincoln;Elisabeth Arens;Cornelia Berger;Winfried Rief

  • A longitudinal study on psychosocial causes and consequences of Internet gaming disorder in adolescence.

    Lutz Wartberg;Levente Kriston;Matthias Zieglmeier;Tania Lincoln

  • The Effect of State Anxiety on Paranoid Ideation and Jumping to Conclusions. An Experimental Investigation

    Tania M. Lincoln;Jennifer Lange;Julia Burau;Cornelia Exner

  • Treatment of negative symptoms: Where do we stand, and where do we go?

    André Aleman;Tania M Lincoln;Richard Bruggeman;Ingrid Melle

  • Impact of stress on paranoia: an experimental investigation of moderators and mediators.

    T. M. Lincoln;N. Peter;M. Schäfer;S. Moritz

  • Resting vagal activity in schizophrenia: meta-analysis of heart rate variability as a potential endophenotype

    Annika Clamor;Tania M. Lincoln;Julian F. Thayer;Julian Koenig

  • The relevance of self-esteem and self-schemas to persecutory delusions: a systematic review.

    Marie-Luise Kesting;Tania Marie Lincoln

  • Does Cognitive Behavior Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) show a sustainable effect on delusions? A meta-analysis.

    Stephanie Mehl;Dirk Werner;Tania M. Lincoln

  • Negative Symptoms and Social Cognition: Identifying Targets for Psychological Interventions

    Tania M. Lincoln;Stephanie Mehl;Marie-Luise Kesting;Winfried Rief

  • The jumping to conclusions bias in delusions: specificity and changeability.

    Tania M. Lincoln;Michael Ziegler;Stephanie Mehl;Winfried Rief

  • Effectiveness of an empirically supported treatment for social phobia in the field.

    Tania Marie Lincoln;Winfried Rief;Kurt Hahlweg;Monika Frank

  • The impact of social stress on self-esteem and paranoid ideation

    Marie-Luise Kesting;Marcel Bredenpohl;Julia Klenke;Stefan Westermann

  • Can paranoid thoughts be reduced by targeting negative emotions and self-esteem? An experimental investigation of a brief compassion-focused intervention.

    Tania M. Lincoln;Felicitas Hohenhaus;Maike Hartmann

  • Relevant dimensions of delusions: continuing the continuum versus category debate.

    Tania M. Lincoln

  • Moving from efficacy to effectiveness in cognitive behavioral therapy for psychosis: a randomized clinical practice trial.

    Tania M. Lincoln;Michael Ziegler;Stephanie Mehl;Marie-Luise Kesting

  • The relevance of cognitive emotion regulation to psychotic symptoms - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Lea Ludwig;Dirk Werner;Tania M. Lincoln

  • Different sides of the same coin? Intercorrelations of cognitive biases in schizophrenia.

    Steffen Moritz;Ruth Veckenstedt;Birgit Hottenrott;Todd S. Woodward

  • Internet gaming disorder in early adolescence: Associations with parental and adolescent mental health

    L. Wartberg;L. Kriston;M. Kramer;A. Schwedler

Frequent Co-Authors

Steffen Moritz
Steffen Moritz University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Michael G. Ziegler
Michael G. Ziegler University of California, San Diego
Frank Larøi
Frank Larøi University of Oslo
Cornelia Exner
Cornelia Exner Leipzig University
Mark Hayward
Mark Hayward University of Sussex
Jürgen Hoyer
Jürgen Hoyer TU Dresden
Jürgen Margraf
Jürgen Margraf Ruhr University Bochum
Wolfgang Lutz
Wolfgang Lutz University of Trier
Todd S. Woodward
Todd S. Woodward University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Psychology, there are flexible online options that can help you launch your career more quickly. Many online programs allow students to study while balancing work and personal commitments, offering accelerated paths toward graduation.

Career pathways in psychology are diverse and range from clinical counseling to school guidance and mental health services. For those seeking licensure, requirements can vary widely from state to state. You can find out the fastest way to become a counselor in Hawaii or learn about the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Idaho if you’re considering working in those regions.

Opportunities also exist for accelerated studies. Explore Illinois accelerated counseling programs or find the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Indiana to see how quickly you can transition from your studies into meaningful work.

Whether you pursue an online degree or a traditional path, understanding state-specific requirements and available program formats is key to advancing your psychology career efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Tania M. Lincoln

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles