World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gerhard Andersson

Gerhard Andersson

Award Badge
Psychology
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 161 49 42 1 1 1131 89773

Gerhard Andersson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gerhard Andersson between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gerhard Andersson published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 37.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 90 publications in 2015. 46 of the 1,364 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 90. Peak 90 publications in 2015. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 28 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 28 publications 2005: 21 publications 2006: 35 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 49 publications 2010: 43 publications 2011: 60 publications 2012: 45 publications 2013: 87 publications 2014: 75 publications 2015: 90 publications 2016: 82 publications 2017: 72 publications 2018: 62 publications 2019: 56 publications 2020: 66 publications 2021: 71 publications 2022: 52 publications 2023: 63 publications 2024: 72 publications 2025: 44 publications 2026: 2 publications
1991 2026

1,364 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gerhard Andersson: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 3
1994 1
1995 9
1996 6
1997 15
1998 21
1999 16
2000 13
2001 11
2002 28
2003 17
2004 28
2005 21
2006 35
2007 22
2008 26
2009 49
2010 43
2011 60
2012 45
2013 87
2014 75
2015 90
2016 82
2017 72
2018 62
2019 56
2020 66
2021 71
2022 52
2023 63
2024 72
2025 44
2026 2
Total 1,364
Download as CSV

Gerhard Andersson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerhard Andersson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 705+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 1,131 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100 1,131
Download as CSV

Gerhard Andersson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerhard Andersson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 144+ D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 161 D-Index — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98 161
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Psychology in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Psychology in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2014 - Nordic Medical Prize, SalusAnsvar/Ulf Nilsonnes Foundation for Medical Research

Overview

Gerhard Andersson is affiliated with Linköping University in Sweden and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a particular focus on digital mental health interventions and clinical psychology. Their research spans various subfields, including applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, and social psychology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, which include:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The most frequent publication venues for their research are:

  • Internet Interventions
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Trials
  • BMC Psychiatry

Gerhard Andersson's recent papers include:

  • The COVID-19 pandemic: The 'black swan' for mental health care and a turning point for e-health (2020, Internet Interventions)
  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression (2021, JAMA Psychiatry)
  • Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data (2021, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • Impact of post-COVID conditions on mental health: a cross-sectional study in Japan and Sweden (2022, BMC Psychiatry)
  • Therapist-supported Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy yields similar effects as face-to-face therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2023, World Psychiatry)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gerhard Andersson include:

  • Per Carlbring
  • Vinaya Manchaiah
  • Eldré W. Beukes
  • Anton Käll
  • Matilda Berg

Over the course of their career, Andersson has received recognition such as the Nordic Medical Prize awarded by SalusAnsvar and the Ulf Nilsonnes Foundation for Medical Research in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Internet-Based and Other Computerized Psychological Treatments for Adult Depression: A Meta-Analysis

    Gerhard Andersson;Pim Cuijpers

  • Psychotherapy for depression in adults: a meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Gerhard Andersson;Patricia van Oppen

  • Guided Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders : a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Gerhard Andersson;Pim Cuijpers;Per Carlbring;Heleen Riper;Heleen Riper

  • A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments.

    Pim Cuijpers;Matthias Berking;Gerhard Andersson;Leanne Quigley

  • Advantages and limitations of Internet-based interventions for common mental disorders

    Gerhard Andersson;Nickolai Titov

  • Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

    Per Carlbring;Gerhard Andersson;Pim Cuijpers;Heleen Riper;Heleen Riper

  • Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.

    P Cuijpers;T Donker;A van Straten;J Li

  • Evaluating Digital Health Interventions: Key Questions and Approaches.

    Elizabeth Murray;Eric B. Hekler;Gerhard Andersson;Linda M. Collins

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • Using the Internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy

    Gerhard Andersson

  • Internet-administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review

    Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Efficacy of self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms a meta-analysis of individual participant data

    Eirini Karyotaki;Heleen Riper;Jos W. Twisk;Adriaan Hoogendoorn

  • The COVID-19 pandemic: The ‘black swan’ for mental health care and a turning point for e-health

    Tim R. Wind;Marleen Rijkeboer;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson;Heleen Riper;Heleen Riper

  • Internet-based self-help for depression : randomised controlled trial

    Gerhard Andersson;Jan Bergström;Fredrik Holländare;Per Carlbring

  • Internet-Delivered Psychological Treatments

    Gerhard Andersson

  • The effects of psychotherapy for adult depression are overestimated: a meta-analysis of study quality and effect size

    P. Cuijpers;A. van Straten;Ernst Thomas Bohlmeijer;S.D. Hollon

  • Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Marit Sijbrandij;Sander Koole;Marcus Huibers

  • Interpersonal psychotherapy for depression: a meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Anna S. Geraedts;Patricia van Oppen;Gerhard Andersson

  • Internet-delivered psychological treatments: from innovation to implementation

    Gerhard Andersson;Nickolai Titov;Blake F. Dear;Alexander Rozental

  • The efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in treating depressive and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons

    Pim Cuijpers;Marit Sijbrandij;Sander L. Koole;Gerhard Andersson

  • Internet-based psychological treatments for depression

    Robert Johansson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Computer-aided psychotherapy for anxiety disorders: a meta-analytic review

    Pim Cuijpers;Isaac M. Marks;Annemieke van Straten;Kate Cavanagh

Frequent Co-Authors

Per Carlbring
Per Carlbring Stockholm University
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Viktor Kaldo
Viktor Kaldo Karolinska Institute
Brjánn Ljótsson
Brjánn Ljótsson Karolinska Institute
Tomas Furmark
Tomas Furmark Uppsala University
Alexander Rozental
Alexander Rozental Karolinska Institute
Nils Lindefors
Nils Lindefors Karolinska Institute
Christian Rück
Christian Rück Karolinska Institute
Erik Hedman
Erik Hedman Karolinska Institute
Lisa Ekselius
Lisa Ekselius Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA can unlock a variety of career pathways, with social work being a prominent option. Many psychology graduates transition into social work roles, thanks to the overlap in counseling, advocacy, and community support skills. Requirements to become a social worker can vary significantly depending on the state where you plan to practice.

For instance, Texas social work education requirements emphasize completing a CSWE-accredited program and obtaining licensure. Similarly, if you are interested in working in Utah, it is important to understand the how to become a social worker in Utah pathway, including field experience and examination requirements.

Those considering practice in Vermont should explore the Vermont social work education requirements. Meanwhile, for candidates drawn to opportunities in Virginia, it’s crucial to review the requirements to be a social worker in Virginia. Each state has its own rules for supervised hours, coursework, and state exams.

Online degrees in psychology and social work can offer the flexibility and credentials needed for these careers, but always check your target state's regulations before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Gerhard Andersson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles