World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
89
Citations
29456
World Ranking
999
National Ranking
33

David Daniel Ebert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Daniel Ebert sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 349 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Daniel Ebert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Daniel Ebert sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Daniel Ebert is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a strong emphasis on applied and clinical psychology, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology. Other areas of study include social psychology and general health professions.

The scientist's work extensively covers digital mental health interventions and topics related to mental health research. Specific areas within their research portfolio include mental health treatment and access, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, the impact of technology on adolescents, behavioral health and interventions, and the effects of COVID-19 on mental health.

David Daniel Ebert has published several papers in prominent venues. Recent publications include:

  • "Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression," 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Sources of Stress and Their Associations With Mental Disorders Among College Students: Results of the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Initiative," 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Cognitive behavior therapy vs. control conditions, other psychotherapies, pharmacotherapies and combined treatment for depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis including 409 trials with 52,702 patients," 2023, World Psychiatry
  • "Acceptance towards digital health interventions - Model validation and further development of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology," 2021, Internet Interventions

The scientist has collaborated frequently with colleagues including Harald Baumeister, Pim Cuijpers, Mathias Harrer, Heleen Riper, and Dirk Lehr.

Publication venues where David Daniel Ebert has frequently contributed include:

  • Internet Interventions
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Psychological Medicine
  • JMIR Mental Health

Their research topics can be summarized as:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Best Publications

  • WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: Prevalence and distribution of mental disorders.

    Randy P. Auerbach;Philippe Mortier;Ronny Bruffaerts;Jordi Alonso

  • Mental disorders among college students in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.

    R. P. Auerbach;J. Alonso;W. G. Axinn;P. Cuijpers

  • Doing Meta-Analysis with R: A Hands-On Guide

    Mathias Harrer;Pim Cuijpers;Toshi A. Furukawa;David D. Ebert

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • Internet and Computer-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Youth: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Outcome Trials

    David Daniel Ebert;Anna-Carlotta Zarski;Helen Christensen;Yvonne Stikkelbroek

  • Preventing the onset of major depressive disorder: A meta-analytic review of psychological interventions

    Kim van Zoonen;Claudia Buntrock;David Daniel Ebert;Filip Smit

  • Deficits in emotion-regulation skills predict alcohol use during and after cognitive-behavioral therapy for alcohol dependence.

    Matthias Berking;Matthias Margraf;David Ebert;Peggilee Wupperman

  • Blending Face-to-Face and Internet-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Mental Disorders in Adults: Systematic Review

    Doris Erbe;Hans Christoph Eichert;Heleen Riper;David Daniel Ebert

  • Internet- and Mobile-Based Psychological Interventions: Applications, Efficacy, and Potential for Improving Mental Health: A Report of the EFPA E-Health Taskforce

    David D. Ebert;Tom Van Daele;Tine Nordgreen;Maria Karekla

  • Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Mathias Harrer;Sophia H. Adam;Harald Baumeister;Pim Cuijpers

  • Standalone smartphone apps for mental health—a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Kiona K. Weisel;Lukas M. Fuhrmann;Matthias Berking;Harald Baumeister

  • The benefit of web- and computer-based interventions for stress : A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Elena Heber;David Daniel Ebert;Dirk Lehr;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers

  • Barriers of mental health treatment utilization among first-year college students: First cross-national results from the WHO World Mental Health International College Student Initiative

    David Daniel Ebert;Philippe Mortier;Fanny Kaehlke;Ronny Bruffaerts

  • Consensus statement on defining and measuring negative effects of Internet interventions

    Alexander Rozental;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson;Johanna Boettcher;David Daniel Ebert

  • Emotion Regulation Skills Training Enhances the Efficacy of Inpatient Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Matthias Berking;David Ebert;Pim Cuijpers;Stefan G Hofmann

  • Sources of Stress and Their Associations With Mental Disorders Among College Students: Results of the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Initiative.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Pim Cuijpers;Yesica Albor;Jordi Alonso

  • Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;David Daniel Ebert;Liesje Donkin;Heleen Riper

  • Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Anne Etzelmueller;Christiaan Vis;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Harald Baumeister

  • How much psychotherapy is needed to treat depression? A metaregression analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Marcus Huibers;David Daniel Ebert;David Daniel Ebert;Sander L. Koole

  • Increasing the acceptance of internet-based mental health interventions in primary care patients with depressive symptoms. A randomized controlled trial

    D.D. Ebert;D.D. Ebert;D.D. Ebert;M. Berking;P. Cuijpers;D. Lehr

  • Effectiveness of Guided and Unguided Low-Intensity Internet Interventions for Adult Alcohol Misuse: A Meta-Analysis

    Heleen Riper;Matthijs Blankers;Hana Hadiwijaya;John Cunningham

  • Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among First-Year College Students: Results From the WMH-ICS Project.

    Philippe Mortier;Randy P Auerbach;Jordi Alonso;Jason Bantjes

  • Why didn’t patients use it? Engagement is the real story in Gilbody et al. (2015), not effectiveness.

    M. Jones;D.D. Ebert;C. Jacobi;I. Beintner

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Berking
Matthias Berking University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dirk Lehr
Dirk Lehr Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Harald Baumeister
Harald Baumeister University of Ulm
Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Randy P. Auerbach
Randy P. Auerbach Columbia University
Eirini Karyotaki
Eirini Karyotaki Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of online programs and career paths. Many students consider advancing into counseling, a field closely related to psychology that offers the chance to work in mental health care, schools, or community organizations.

There are numerous best counseling degree programs in Cleveland that provide specialized tracks in areas like school, clinical, and addiction counseling. In addition, students in the South often look into top Georgia counseling degree programs known for their flexible online and hybrid offerings.

For those interested in the Midwest, several best college counseling programs in Iowa focus on developing practical skills for a range of settings. Similarly, there are high-quality Illinois counseling degree programs that prepare graduates for licensure and professional practice.

Each of these pathways can lead to fulfilling work as a licensed counselor, school psychologist, mental health professional, or academic advisor—making them excellent options for those interested in psychology careers.

Best Scientists Citing David Daniel Ebert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles