World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 52 266 266 2 2 194 12303
Psychology 61 3348 3083 170 163 191 16540

Eirini Karyotaki publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eirini Karyotaki between 2014 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eirini Karyotaki published across 13 years, from 2014 to 2026, averaging 19.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2023. 25 of the 252 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2014 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2023. 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 38 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 51 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 1 publication
2014 2026

252 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eirini Karyotaki: publications per year, 2014 to 2026
Year Publications
2014 6
2015 3
2016 6
2017 9
2018 14
2019 24
2020 21
2021 38
2022 32
2023 51
2024 23
2025 24
2026 1
Total 252
Download as CSV

Eirini Karyotaki publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eirini Karyotaki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 191
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Eirini Karyotaki D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eirini Karyotaki sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Eirini Karyotaki is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on psychological and medical fields, with a substantial concentration on experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and applied psychology. Additional areas of study include pharmacology and social psychology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to mental health research.

The scientist's work addresses various topics related to mental health, including digital mental health interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and the treatment of major depression. Further key topics include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, cognitive processes, mental health treatment and access, as well as maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Eirini Karyotaki include:

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Sources of Stress and Their Associations With Mental Disorders Among College Students: Results of the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Initiative, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Karyotaki encompass:

  • Pim Cuijpers
  • Clara Miguel
  • Markéta Čihařová
  • Mathias Harrer
  • Toshi A. Furukawa

The scientist publishes regularly in several academic journals, with the most frequent venues being:

  • JAMA Psychiatry
  • Psychological Medicine
  • BMJ Open
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • World Psychiatry

Eirini Karyotaki has contributed extensively to the literature on mental health research topics, with an emphasis on studies related to digital interventions and treatments for major depression. Their collaboration network and presence in high-impact journals underline a focus on advancing knowledge in psychological treatments and mental health accessibility.

Best Publications

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • Efficacy of self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms a meta-analysis of individual participant data

    Eirini Karyotaki;Heleen Riper;Jos W. Twisk;Adriaan Hoogendoorn

  • The effects of psychotherapies for major depression in adults on remission, recovery and improvement: A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Erica Weitz;Erica Weitz;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence

    Pim Cuijpers;Ioana A. Cristea;Eirini Karyotaki;Mirjam Reijnders

  • Effectiveness and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats in Adults With Depression: A Network Meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Hisashi Noma;Eirini Karyotaki;Andrea Cipriani;Andrea Cipriani

  • Adherence to Internet-Based and Face-to-Face Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression: A Meta-Analysis

    Wouter van Ballegooijen;Pim Cuijpers;Annemieke van Straten;Eirini Karyotaki

  • Predictors of treatment dropout in self-guided web-based interventions for depression: an 'individual patient data' meta-analysis

    Eirini Karyotaki;Annet M. Kleiboer;Filip Smit;David Trevor Turner

  • Psychological Interventions for Psychosis: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Outcome Studies

    David Trevor Turner;Mark van der Gaag;Eirini Karyotaki;Pim Cuijpers

  • Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Mathias Harrer;Sophia H. Adam;Harald Baumeister;Pim Cuijpers

  • Efficacy of Self-guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms

    Eirini Karyotaki;Heleen Riper;Jos Twisk;Adriaan Hoogendoorn

  • Psychotherapy for Depression Across Different Age Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Eirini Karyotaki;Dikla Eckshtain;Mei Yi Ng

  • Sources of Stress and Their Associations With Mental Disorders Among College Students: Results of the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Initiative.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Pim Cuijpers;Yesica Albor;Jordi Alonso

  • The effects of psychotherapies for depression on response, remission, reliable change, and deterioration: A meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Marketa Ciharova;Clara Miguel

  • Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;David Daniel Ebert;Liesje Donkin;Heleen Riper

  • Effects of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Routine Care for Adults in Treatment for Depression and Anxiety : Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Anne Etzelmueller;Christiaan Vis;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Harald Baumeister

  • Psychotherapies for depression: a network meta-analysis covering efficacy, acceptability and long-term outcomes of all main treatment types.

    Pim Cuijpers;Soledad Quero;Hisashi Noma;Marketa Ciharova

  • The effects of fifteen evidence-supported therapies for adult depression: A meta-analytic review.

    Pim Cuijpers;Eirini Karyotaki;Leonore de Wit;David D. Ebert;David D. Ebert

  • Effectiveness and treatment moderators of internet interventions for adult problem drinking: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 19 randomised controlled trials

    Heleen Riper;Adriaan Hoogendoorn;Pim Cuijpers;Eirini Karyotaki

  • The effects of psychological treatment of maternal depression on children and parental functioning: a meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Erica Weitz;Erica Weitz;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Judy Garber

  • A Meta-Analysis of Social Skills Training and Related Interventions for Psychosis.

    David T Turner;Edel McGlanaghy;Pim Cuijpers;Mark van der Gaag

  • Combining pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy or monotherapy for major depression? A meta-analysis on the long-term effects.

    E. Karyotaki;Y. Smit;K. Holdt Henningsen;M.J.H. Huibers

Frequent Co-Authors

Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
David Daniel Ebert
David Daniel Ebert Technical University of Munich
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Toshi A. Furukawa
Toshi A. Furukawa Kyoto University
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Andrea Cipriani
Andrea Cipriani University of Oxford
Annet Kleiboer
Annet Kleiboer Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Marcus J.H. Huibers
Marcus J.H. Huibers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Steffen Moritz
Steffen Moritz University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens a variety of dynamic career opportunities. Online degrees in psychology can lead to specialized roles in health, industry, and clinical practice. Many students gravitate toward fields like health psychology, where professionals combine clinical skills with an understanding of how behavior impacts health outcomes. Curious about what you might earn? Learn more about health psychology salary ranges based on experience and location.

High salaries are often linked to advanced qualifications. If you're wondering about the highest paying job in psychology, consider careers such as psychiatric doctoral roles, industrial-organizational psychologists, and neuropsychologists. There are also plenty of high paying jobs with a psychology degree for those with master’s and doctoral credentials.

Considering a specialized certification? Becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a popular path, particularly for professionals focused on behavioral therapy and autism spectrum disorders. Before committing, make sure you understand the bcba exam cost and requirements for board certification.

Best Scientists Citing Eirini Karyotaki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles