World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
10311
World Ranking
4073
National Ranking
436

John H. Wearden publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Wearden sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John H. Wearden D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John H. Wearden sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John H. Wearden is affiliated with Keele University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work includes investigations into neuroscience and music perception, multisensory perception and integration, and hearing loss and rehabilitation. Other topics covered in their research involve diverse music education insights, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, neural dynamics and brain function, and academic and historical perspectives in psychology.

John H. Wearden's recent papers feature studies published primarily in the field of timing and time perception. Notable publications include:

  • Filled-Duration Illusions, 2021, Timing & Time Perception
  • Judgements of the Duration of Auditory and Visual Stimuli, 2021, Timing & Time Perception
  • Decisional Carryover Effects in Interval Timing: Evidence of a Generalized Response Bias, 2020, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • What Came Before: Assimilation Effects in the Categorization of Time Intervals, 2023, Cognition
  • Weber's Law for Timing and Time Perception: Reconciling the Poisson Clock with Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET), 2022, Timing & Time Perception

They have published extensively in several academic venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in Timing & Time Perception. Other venues include Psychological Research, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, History & Philosophy of Psychology, and Attention Perception & Psychophysics.

  • Timing & Time Perception
  • Psychological Research
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • History & Philosophy of Psychology
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics

Collaboration is a component of their academic work, with frequent coauthors such as Jordan Wehrman, Ruth Ogden, Paul F. Sowman, Luke A. Jones, and Robert D. Sanders contributing to their research outputs.

  • Jordan Wehrman
  • Ruth Ogden
  • Paul F. Sowman
  • Luke A. Jones
  • Robert D. Sanders

Overall, John H. Wearden has built a body of work that intersects neuroscience and psychology, with a distinct emphasis on timing mechanisms and perceptual processes related to auditory and visual stimuli. Their contributions extend across several subfields and topics that reflect a broad scientific interest in understanding cognitive and neural functions.

Best Publications

  • Why "sounds are judged longer than lights": application of a model of the internal clock in humans.

    J.H. Wearden;H. Edwards;M. Fakhri;A. Percival

  • Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration

    I. S. Penton-Voak;Helen Edwards;Andrew Percival;J. H. Wearden

  • Feeling the heat: body temperature and the rate of subjective time, revisited.

    J H Wearden;I S Penton-Voak

  • Vierordt's The Experimental Study of the Time Sense (1868) and its legacy

    Helga Lejeune;J. H. Wearden

  • Human Performance on an Analogue of an Interval Bisection Task

    J. H. Wearden

  • Do humans possess an internal clock with scalar timing properties

    J.H Wearden

  • Scalar properties in human timing: Conformity and violations

    J. H. Wearden;Helga Lejeune

  • Speeding up an internal clock in children? Effects of visual flicker on subjective duration.

    Sylvie Droit-Volet;John Wearden

  • Temporal generalization in humans

    J. H. Wearden

  • Temporal bisection in children.

    Sylvie Droit-Volet;John H. Wearden

  • Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion.

    John H. Wearden;Roger Norton;Simon Martin;Oliver Montford-Bebb

  • Stimulus Range Effects in Temporal Bisection by Humans

    John H Wearden;André Ferrara

  • Matching since Baum (1979).

    J. H. Wearden;I. S. Burgess

  • Temporal Generalization in 3- to 8-Year-Old Children

    Sylvie Droit-Volet;Angélique Clément;John Wearden

  • The comparative psychology of fixed-interval responding: Some quantitative analyses ☆

    Helga Lejeune;Helga Lejeune;J.H Wearden;J.H Wearden

  • "Beyond the fields we know...": exploring and developing scalar timing theory.

    J.H Wearden

  • Age and IQ effects on stimulus and response timing

    J. H. Wearden;A. J. Wearden;P. M. A. Rabbitt

  • Temporal control of rhythmic performance: a comparison between young and old adults.

    S Vanneste;V Pouthas;J H Wearden

  • Across the Great Divide: Animal Psychology and Time in Humans

    John Wearden;Helga Lejeune

  • When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?

    J. H. Wearden;N. P. M. Todd;L. A. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Sylvie Droit-Volet
Sylvie Droit-Volet University of Clermont Auvergne
Ian S. Penton-Voak
Ian S. Penton-Voak University of Bristol
Anthony J. Bailey
Anthony J. Bailey University of British Columbia
Gordon D. A. Brown
Gordon D. A. Brown University of Warwick
Iser G. DeLeon
Iser G. DeLeon University of Florida
Teresa McCormack
Teresa McCormack Queen's University Belfast
Alison Wearden
Alison Wearden University of Manchester
Neil Stewart
Neil Stewart University of Warwick
John N. Towse
John N. Towse Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to diverse career opportunities and flexibility in learning. Many students choose online programs for their convenience and variety of specializations, from clinical psychology to applied behavioral analysis.

When considering your options, geographic trends in education can provide valuable insights. For instance, the popular psychology degrees in Las Vegas reflect a growing interest in counseling and organizational psychology. Similarly, the most popular psychology degree programs in Nashville often emphasize clinical practice and research.

In the Southwest, the most popular psychology degree programs in Oklahoma show strong pathways toward school and community psychology careers. Central Florida, through its top-ranked psychology degree programs in Orlando, is known for producing graduates in both academic and health service settings.

Whether you aim to become a counselor, researcher, or consultant, online psychology degrees offer the flexibility and accreditation needed to launch rewarding career journeys across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing John H. Wearden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles