World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
19284
World Ranking
2065
National Ranking
83

Neuroscience

D-Index
78
Citations
21804
World Ranking
1768
National Ranking
161

Hermann J. Müller publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hermann J. Müller sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 458 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Hermann J. Müller D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hermann J. Müller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hermann J. Müller is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their work also extends to computer vision and pattern recognition, human-computer interaction, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their studies frequently address topics such as neural and behavioral psychology, visual perception and processing mechanisms, multisensory perception and integration, visual attention and saliency detection, neural dynamics and brain function, face recognition and perception, as well as gaze tracking and assistive technology.

Hermann J. Müller has contributed multiple publications to various scientific venues. Some of the main publication outlets include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Visual Cognition
  • Journal of Vision
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Psychological Science

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Müller include:

  • Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search, 2020, Cortex
  • Terms of debate: Consensus definitions to guide the scientific discourse on visual distraction, 2024, Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Automatic Guidance (and Misguidance) of Visuospatial Attention by Acquired Scene Memory: Evidence From an N1pc Polarity Reversal, 2020, Psychological Science
  • Statistical Learning of Frequent Distractor Locations in Visual Search Involves Regional Signal Suppression in Early Visual Cortex, 2021, Cerebral Cortex
  • Attentional capture: An ameliorable side-effect of searching for salient targets, 2021, Visual Cognition

Throughout their career, Müller has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Zhuanghua Shi
  • Markus Conci
  • Thomas Geyer
  • Fredrik Allenmark
  • Artyom Zinchenko

Best Publications

  • Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption

    Hermann J. Müller;Patrick M A Rabbitt

  • Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions

    Hermann J. Müller;Dieter Heller;Johannes Ziegler

  • Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account

    Andrew Found;Hermann J. Müller

  • Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.

    Hermann J. Müller;Brit Reimann;Joseph Krummenacher

  • Decomposition of Variability in the Execution of Goal-Oriented Tasks: Three Components of Skill Improvement.

    Hermann Müller;Dagmar Sternad

  • Sensitivity and criterion effects in the spatial cuing of visual attention

    Hermann J. Müller;John M. Findlay

  • SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search

    Glyn W. Humphreys;Hermann J. Muller

  • Identification of a novel viral protein in infectious bursal disease virus-infected cells.

    Egbert Mundt;Jörg Beyer;Hermann Müller

  • The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays.

    Hermann J. Müller;John M. Findlay

  • I See What You Mean: How Attentional Selection Is Shaped by Ascribing Intentions to Others

    Eva Wiese;Agnieszka Wykowska;Jan Zwickel;Hermann J. Müller;Hermann J. Müller

  • Attentional Capture by Salient Color Singleton Distractors Is Modulated by Top-Down Dimensional Set

    Hermann J. Müller;Thomas Geyer;Michael Zehetleitner;Joseph Krummenacher

  • Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: inhibition of return.

    Hermann J. Müller;Adrian von Mühlenen

  • Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex.

    Thomas Töllner;Michael Zehetleitner;Klaus Gramann;Hermann J. Müller;Hermann J. Müller

  • Human brain dynamics accompanying use of egocentric and allocentric reference frames during navigation

    Klaus Gramann;Julie Onton;Davide Riccobon;Hermann J. Mueller

  • Luminance-increment detection: capacity-limited or not?

    Hermann J. Müller;Glyn W. Humphreys

  • Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.

    Thomas Geyer;Hermann J. Müller;Hermann J. Müller;Joseph Krummenacher

  • Beliefs about the Minds of Others Influence How We Process Sensory Information

    Agnieszka Wykowska;Agnieszka Wykowska;Eva Wiese;Eva Wiese;Aaron Prosser;Aaron Prosser;Hermann J. Müller;Hermann J. Müller

  • The genetic basis for the antigenicity of the VP2 protein of the infectious bursal disease virus

    Dorothea Schnitzler;Frank Bernstein;Hermann Müller;Hermann Becht

  • Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions.

    Joseph Krummenacher;Hermann J. Müller;Hermann J. Müller;Dieter Heller

  • Evidence of Separable Spatial Representations in a Virtual Navigation Task

    Klaus Gramann;Hermann J. Muller;Eva-Maria Eick;Bernd Schonebeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathrin Finke
Kathrin Finke Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Torsten Schubert
Torsten Schubert Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Reimar Johne
Reimar Johne Federal Institute for Risk Assessment
Christian Sorg
Christian Sorg Technical University of Munich
Agnieszka Wykowska
Agnieszka Wykowska Italian Institute of Technology
Klaus Gramann
Klaus Gramann Technical University of Berlin
Werner X. Schneider
Werner X. Schneider Bielefeld University
Marius Usher
Marius Usher Tel Aviv University
Stefan Pollmann
Stefan Pollmann Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Glyn W. Humphreys
Glyn W. Humphreys University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in Neuroscience opens doors to diverse educational and career options, especially in the rapidly growing fields of mental health and behavioral science. Many students interested in Neuroscience often consider related online degrees to broaden their expertise or enhance career flexibility.

Programs such as psychology degrees are especially popular for those seeking foundational knowledge of the mind and behavior at an affordable price. For those with a passion for social work, pursuing one of the msw degree programs can provide both clinical skills and greater job prospects in counseling or community services.

Those aiming to become licensed psychologists often explore the online psy d program options tailored for practical, hands-on training. Additionally, students with an interest in family dynamics or couples counseling may opt for one of the online marriage and family therapy programs that can often be completed in a shorter timeframe.

Each of these online degrees offers a unique approach to understanding human behavior or providing support in clinical settings, making them valuable pathways for Neuroscience students looking to specialize or expand their professional impact.

Best Scientists Citing Hermann J. Müller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles