World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
46
Citations
11435
World Ranking
6336
National Ranking
55

Neuroscience

D-Index
49
Citations
12285
World Ranking
5893
National Ranking
39

Marius Usher publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marius Usher sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 149 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marius Usher D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marius Usher sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh

Overview

Marius Usher is affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel and specializes primarily in Neuroscience. Their research broadly encompasses several subfields, with a strong focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, and Statistics and Probability. The interdisciplinary nature of their work reflects a wide engagement across neural, psychological, and economic frameworks.

Their scientific contributions cover multiple topics of study, including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Usher has published extensively in several key academic venues. Their frequent publication journals and repositories include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Psychological Review
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Consciousness and Cognition

Some of their recent papers are:

  • "Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value" (2020, eLife)
  • "Causal Responsibility and Robust Causation" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Evidence integration and decision confidence are modulated by stimulus consistency" (2022, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • "Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value" (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))
  • "Value certainty in drift-diffusion models of preferential choice." (2021, Psychological Review)

Marius Usher often collaborates with other researchers. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Moshe Glickman
  • Konstantinos Tsetsos
  • You-Ping Yang
  • Dino J. Levy
  • Veit Stuphorn

In recognition of their contributions, Usher was awarded the title of Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1999.

Best Publications

  • The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model.

    Marius Usher;James L. McClelland

  • The Role of Locus Coeruleus in the Regulation of Cognitive Performance

    Marius Usher;Jonathan D. Cohen;David Servan-Schreiber;Janusz Rajkowski

  • The Demise of Short-Term Memory Revisited: Empirical and Computational Investigations of Recency Effects

    Eddy J. Davelaar;Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein;Amir Ashkenazi;Henk J. Haarmann

  • Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.

    Marius Usher;James L. McClelland

  • Lateral interactions in primary visual cortex: a model bridging physiology and psychophysics

    Martin Stemmler;Marius Usher;Marius Usher;Marius Usher;Ernst Niebur

  • Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception

    Marius Usher;Nick Donnelly

  • Salience driven value integration explains decision biases and preference reversal

    Konstantinos Tsetsos;Nick Chater;Marius Usher

  • Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity and value-based multidimensional choice

    Rafal Bogacz;Marius Usher;Jiaxiang Zhang;James L. McClelland

  • Economic irrationality is optimal during noisy decision making

    Konstantinos Tsetsos;Konstantinos Tsetsos;Rani Moran;James Moreland;Nick Chater

  • Post choice information integration as a causal determinant of confidence: Novel data and a computational account

    Rani Moran;Andrei R. Teodorescu;Marius Usher

  • Preference reversal in multiattribute choice

    Konstantinos Tsetsos;Marius Usher;Nick Chater

  • The Timescale of Perceptual Evidence Integration Can Be Adapted to the Environment

    Ori Ossmy;Rani Moran;Thomas Pfeffer;Thomas Pfeffer;Konstantinos Tsetsos

  • Maintenance of semantic information in capacity-limited item short-term memory.

    Henk Haarmann;Marius Usher

  • Hick's law in a stochastic race model with speed-accuracy tradeoffs

    Marius Usher;Zeev Olami;James L. McClelland

  • Disentangling decision models: from independence to competition

    Andrei R. Teodorescu;Marius Usher

  • Individual differences in semantic short-term memory capacity and reading comprehension

    Henk J Haarmann;Eddy J Davelaar;Marius Usher

  • Modeling the temporal dynamics of it neurons in visual search: A mechanism for top-down selective attention

    Marius Usher;Ernst Niebur

  • Confirmation Bias through Selective Overweighting of Choice-Consistent Evidence.

    Bharath Chandra Talluri;Anne E. Urai;Anne E. Urai;Konstantinos Tsetsos;Marius Usher

  • Dynamic pattern formation leads to 1/f noise in neural populations.

    Marius Usher;Martin Stemmler;Zeev Olami

  • We See More Than We Can Report: “Cost Free” Color Phenomenality Outside Focal Attention

    Zohar Z. Bronfman;Noam Brezis;Hiilla Jacobson;Marius Usher

  • The "benefits" of distractibility: mechanisms underlying increased Stroop effects in schizophrenia.

    Carter Cs;Hachten Pc;Usher M

  • Modelling Natural Action Selection: Extending a biologically inspired model of choice: multi-alternatives, nonlinearity, and value-based multidimensional choice

    Rafal Bogacz;Marius Usher;Jiaxiang Zhang;James L. McClelland

Frequent Co-Authors

Hermann J. Müller
Hermann J. Müller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
James L. McClelland
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Tobias H. Donner
Tobias H. Donner Universität Hamburg
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Nick Chater
Nick Chater University of Warwick
Ernst Niebur
Ernst Niebur Johns Hopkins University
Dan Zakay
Dan Zakay Reichman University
Eytan Ruppin
Eytan Ruppin National Institutes of Health
Avishai Henik
Avishai Henik Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Christof Koch
Christof Koch Allen Institute for Brain Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience studies in the USA can open doors to a wide array of allied fields, especially in mental health and human services. As the demand for qualified professionals grows, online education offers new flexibility for building your expertise and advancing your career.

If you’re interested in counseling, consider exploring cacrep-accredited programs, which meet strict standards for training clinical mental health counselors. For value-conscious students, there are also affordable options like the affordable master's in counseling online, offering flexibility and cost savings.

Many neuroscience graduates pursue roles that intersect with therapy and psychology. If you’re interested in specializing, you can look into a masters in marriage and family therapy online. Alternatively, advancing your education with a psychology masters online can broaden your career options in research, counseling, or academia.

These programs offer accessible entry points into rewarding careers for those inspired by neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Marius Usher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles