World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael N. Shadlen

Michael N. Shadlen

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
75
Citations
47801
World Ranking
1968
National Ranking
942

Michael N. Shadlen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael N. Shadlen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 152 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael N. Shadlen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael N. Shadlen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Karl Spencer Lashley Award, The American Philosophical Society in recognition of his pioneering experimental and theoretical studies of decision-making, identifying neural mechanisms that accumulate and convert sensory information toward behavioral choices
  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2014 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 2012 - Golden Brain Award, Minerva Foundation
  • 2009 - W. Alden Spencer Award, College of Physicians and Surgeons

Overview

Michael N. Shadlen is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Neuroscience, with extensive work in Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, and Biomedical Engineering.

The scientist's research topics encompass various aspects of neural function and behavior, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

Michael N. Shadlen has contributed frequently to several publication venues, with the most publications appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Neuron
  • Nature Neuroscience
  • Journal of Neuroscience

Recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • "Low-dimensional dynamics for working memory and time encoding" (2020), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "An Open Resource for Non-human Primate Optogenetics" (2020), Neuron
  • "Flexible neural control of motor units" (2022), Nature Neuroscience
  • "Context-Dependent Decision Making in a Premotor Circuit" (2020), Neuron
  • "Differentiating between integration and non-integration strategies in perceptual decision making" (2020), eLife

The scientist regularly collaborates with several co-authors, among whom the most frequent are:

  • Ariel Zylberberg
  • Eric M. Trautmann
  • Gabriel M Stine
  • Daniel M. Wolpert
  • Mark M. Churchland

Michael N. Shadlen has received the following awards:

  • Karl Spencer Lashley Award, The American Philosophical Society (2017), in recognition of pioneering experimental and theoretical studies of decision-making, identifying neural mechanisms that accumulate and convert sensory information toward behavioral choices
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2015)
  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) (2014)
  • Golden Brain Award, Minerva Foundation (2012)
  • W. Alden Spencer Award, College of Physicians and Surgeons (2009)

Best Publications

  • The Neural Basis of Decision Making

    Joshua I. Gold;Michael N. Shadlen

  • The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding

    Michael N. Shadlen;William T. Newsome

  • The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance.

    KH Britten;MN Shadlen;WT Newsome;JA Movshon

  • Neural Basis of a Perceptual Decision in the Parietal Cortex (Area LIP) of the Rhesus Monkey

    Michael N. Shadlen;William T. Newsome

  • Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task

    Jamie D. Roitman;Michael N. Shadlen

  • Noise, neural codes and cortical organization

    Michael N. Shadlen;William T. Newsome

  • Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance

    Ehud Zohary;Michael N. Shadlen;William T. Newsome

  • A relationship between behavioral choice and the visual responses of neurons in macaque MT

    K. H. Britten;W. T. Newsome;M. N. Shadlen;S. Celebrini

  • fMRI of human visual cortex

    Stephen A. Engel;David E. Rumelhart;Brian A. Wandell;Adrian T. Lee

  • Representation of Confidence Associated with a Decision by Neurons in the Parietal Cortex

    Roozbeh Kiani;Michael N. Shadlen

  • Neural correlates of a decision in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of the macaque

    Jong-Nam Kim;Michael N. Shadlen

  • Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli

    Joshua I. Gold;Michael N. Shadlen

  • A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion

    MN Shadlen;KH Britten;WT Newsome;JA Movshon

  • Temporal context calibrates interval timing.

    Mehrdad Jazayeri;Michael N Shadlen

  • Motion perception: seeing and deciding.

    Michael N. Shadlen;William T. Newsome

  • The effect of stimulus strength on the speed and accuracy of a perceptual decision

    John Palmer;Alexander C. Huk;Michael N. Shadlen

  • Decision-making with multiple alternatives.

    Anne K Churchland;Roozbeh Kiani;Michael N Shadlen

  • Probabilistic Population Codes for Bayesian Decision Making

    Jeffrey M. Beck;Wei Ji Ma;Wei Ji Ma;Roozbeh Kiani;Timothy Hanks

  • Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals.

    Britten Kh;Shadlen Mn;Newsome Wt;Movshon Ja

  • Changes of mind in decision-making

    Arbora Resulaj;Roozbeh Kiani;Daniel M. Wolpert;Michael N. Shadlen

  • The Influence of Behavioral Context on the Representation of a Perceptual Decision in Developing Oculomotor Commands

    Joshua I. Gold;Michael N. Shadlen

Frequent Co-Authors

Roozbeh Kiani
Roozbeh Kiani New York University
William T. Newsome
William T. Newsome Stanford University
Daniel M. Wolpert
Daniel M. Wolpert Columbia University
Anne K. Churchland
Anne K. Churchland University of California, Los Angeles
Daphna Shohamy
Daphna Shohamy Columbia University
Joshua I. Gold
Joshua I. Gold University of Pennsylvania
Richard Axel
Richard Axel Columbia University
Alexandre Pouget
Alexandre Pouget University of Geneva
J. Anthony Movshon
J. Anthony Movshon New York University
Michael L. Platt
Michael L. Platt University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael N. Shadlen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles