World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gregory C. DeAngelis

Gregory C. DeAngelis

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
66
Citations
18530
World Ranking
2980
National Ranking
1384

Gregory C. DeAngelis publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory C. DeAngelis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 193 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gregory C. DeAngelis D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory C. DeAngelis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gregory C. DeAngelis is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Neuroscience, with a total of 64 publications reaching various subfields within this domain.

Their work has strong emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience, featuring prominently with 56 publications. Additional subfields include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology with 11 publications, Ophthalmology with 7, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience with 5, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition with 3 publications.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Categorization, perception, and language

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include Dora E. Angelaki, Sabyasachi Shivkumar, Ralf M. Haefner, Akiyuki Anzai, and Gábor Lengyel.

Gregory C. DeAngelis's recent papers illustrate a focus on neural processing and perceptual mechanisms. Notable publications include:

  • Tracking the Mind's Eye: Primate Gaze Behavior during Virtual Visuomotor Navigation Reflects Belief Dynamics, 2020, Neuron
  • Multisensory neural processing: from cue integration to causal inference, 2020, Current Opinion in Physiology
  • Flexible coding of object motion in multiple reference frames by parietal cortex neurons, 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • Causal inference during closed-loop navigation: parsing of self- and object-motion, 2023, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Transformations of sensory information in the brain suggest changing criteria for optimality, 2024, PLoS Computational Biology

Publication venues that frequently feature their work encompass bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 11 publications, Journal of Vision with 7, Journal of Neuroscience with 3, Scientific Reports with 2, and Current Opinion in Physiology with 1 publication.

Best Publications

  • Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors

    Izumi Ohzawa;Gregory C. DeAngelis;Ralph D. Freeman

  • Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways

    Gregory C. DeAngelis;Izumi Ohzawa;Ralph D. Freeman

  • Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd

    Yong Gu;Dora E Angelaki;Gregory C DeAngelis;Gregory C DeAngelis

  • Length and width tuning of neurons in the cat's primary visual cortex

    G. C. DeAngelis;R. D. Freeman;I. Ohzawa

  • Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I: General characteristics and postnatal development

    G. C. DeAngelis;I. Ohzawa;R. D. Freeman

  • Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration

    Christopher R Fetsch;Alexandre Pouget;Alexandre Pouget;Gregory C DeAngelis;Gregory C DeAngelis;Dora E Angelaki;Dora E Angelaki

  • The physiology of stereopsis.

    B. G. Cumming;G. C. DeAngelis

  • Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth

    Gregory C. DeAngelis;Bruce G. Cumming;William T. Newsome

  • Dynamic Reweighting of Visual and Vestibular Cues during Self-Motion Perception

    Christopher R. Fetsch;Amanda H. Turner;Gregory C. DeAngelis;Dora E. Angelaki

  • Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation

    G. C. DeAngelis;I. Ohzawa;R. D. Freeman

  • Organization of suppression in receptive fields of neurons in cat visual cortex.

    G. C. DeAngelis;J. G. Robson;I. Ohzawa;R. D. Freeman

  • Multisensory integration: psychophysics, neurophysiology, and computation.

    Dora E Angelaki;Yong Gu;Gregory C DeAngelis

  • Organization of Disparity-Selective Neurons in Macaque Area MT

    Gregory C. DeAngelis;William T. Newsome

  • Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex

    Izumi Ohzawa;Gregory C. Deangelis;Ralph D. Freeman

  • A normalization model of multisensory integration

    Tomokazu Ohshiro;Dora E Angelaki;Gregory C DeAngelis

  • Functional Micro-Organization of Primary Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Analysis of Nearby Neurons

    Gregory C. DeAngelis;Geoffrey M. Ghose;Izumi Ohzawa;Ralph D. Freeman

  • Visual and Nonvisual Contributions to Three-Dimensional Heading Selectivity in the Medial Superior Temporal Area

    Yong Gu;Paul V. Watkins;Dora E. Angelaki;Gregory C. DeAngelis

  • Depth is encoded in the visual cortex by a specialized receptive field structure.

    Gregory C. DeAngelis;Izumi Ohzawa;Ralph D. Freeman

  • Bridging the gap between theories of sensory cue integration and the physiology of multisensory neurons

    Christopher R. Fetsch;Gregory C. DeAngelis;Dora E. Angelaki

  • A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals

    Yong Gu;Gregory C DeAngelis;Dora E Angelaki

  • Coding of Horizontal Disparity and Velocity by MT Neurons in the Alert Macaque

    Gregory C. DeAngelis;Takanori Uka

Frequent Co-Authors

Dora E. Angelaki
Dora E. Angelaki New York University
Ralph D. Freeman
Ralph D. Freeman University of California, Berkeley
Alexandre Pouget
Alexandre Pouget University of Geneva
Izumi Ohzawa
Izumi Ohzawa Osaka University
William T. Newsome
William T. Newsome Stanford University
Bruce G. Cumming
Bruce G. Cumming National Institutes of Health
J. David Dickman
J. David Dickman Baylor College of Medicine
Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo
Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo University of Western Ontario
Richard T. Born
Richard T. Born Harvard University
Anna W. Roe
Anna W. Roe New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Neuroscience degree opens doors to a range of educational and career opportunities. Many students are now considering online programs for greater flexibility, with options to obtain a bachelor degree online in 2 years. These accelerated pathways allow you to fast-track your studies and enter the workforce sooner.

Neuroscience can lead to rewarding careers in research, healthcare, pharma, and technology. If you are interested in potential earnings, related fields such as biomedical engineering, computer science, and health informatics are consistently ranked among the highest paying bachelor degrees entry-level. Exploring interdisciplinary majors could maximize your career prospects and earning potential.

It’s also helpful to review the most lucrative majors when planning your academic path. Combining neuroscience with data science or IT may further boost your opportunities in both healthcare and tech-driven sectors.

Finally, affordability matters. Thankfully, there are many online college that accepts fafsa options, making it easier to finance your education with federal aid. Carefully exploring these pathways will help you craft the ideal route toward your neuroscience career.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory C. DeAngelis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles