World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
63
Citations
11634
World Ranking
2529
National Ranking
168

Julian Gutt publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian Gutt sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 508 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Julian Gutt D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian Gutt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Julian Gutt is affiliated with the Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a strong emphasis on polar research and ecology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as polar research and ecology, ocean acidification effects and responses, marine animal studies, marine and fisheries research, marine and coastal ecosystems, coral and marine ecosystems studies, and cryospheric studies and observations.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Julian Gutt include David K. A. Barnes, Huw J. Griffiths, Dieter Piepenburg, Simon A. Morley, and Andrew Constable.

Julian Gutt has published regularly in several academic venues, with notable repeated contributions to Frontiers in Marine Science and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Other publication venues include Current Biology, Polar Biology, and Biogeosciences.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Julian Gutt are:

  • Antarctic ecosystems in transition - life between stresses and opportunities, 2020, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Global Drivers on Southern Ocean Ecosystems: Changing Physical Environments and Anthropogenic Pressures in an Earth System, 2020, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Responses of Southern Ocean Seafloor Habitats and Communities to Global and Local Drivers of Change, 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Marine Ecosystem Assessment for the Southern Ocean: Summary for Policymakers, 2023, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Spatial patterns and behaviour of notothenioid fishes off the northern Antarctic Peninsula, 2022, Polar Biology

Julian Gutt has also contributed to book publications, including a title published through Maribus eBooks:

  • World ocean review: Mit den Meeren leben 7. Lebensgarant Ozean - nachhaltig nutzen, wirksam schützen, 2021

Best Publications

  • Climate change and Southern Ocean ecosystems I: how changes in physical habitats directly affect marine biota

    Andrew J. Constable;Andrew J. Constable;Jessica Melbourne-Thomas;Jessica Melbourne-Thomas;Stuart P. Corney;Kevin R. Arrigo

  • Antarctic climate change and the environment

    Peter Convey;R. Bindschadler;G. Di Prisco;E. Fahrbach

  • Antarctic climate change and the environment: an update

    John Turner;Nicholas E Barrand;Thomas J Bracegirdle;Peter Convey

  • Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean

    Claude De Broyer;Philippe Koubbi;Huw J. Griffiths;Ben Raymond

  • On the direct impact of ice on marine benthic communities, a review

    Julian Gutt

  • A roadmap for Antarctic and Southern Ocean science for the next two decades and beyond

    M.C. Kennicutt;S.L. Chown;J.J. Cassano;D. Liggett

  • The Southern Ocean Ecosystem Under Multiple Climate Change Stresses - An Integrated Circumpolar Assessment

    Julian Gutt;Nancy Bertler;Thomas J. Bracegirdle;Alexander Buschmann

  • Antarctic marine biodiversity an overview

    Wolf Arntz;Julian Gutt;Michael Klages

  • Impact of iceberg scouring on polar benthic habitats

    Julian Gutt;A. Starmans;Gerhard Dieckmann

  • Partitioning of benthic community respiration in the Arctic (northwestern Barents Sea)

    D. Piepenburg;T. H. Blackburn;C. F. von Dorrien;Julian Gutt

  • Scale-dependent impact on diversity of Antarctic benthos caused by grounding of icebergs

    Julian Gutt;Dieter Piepenburg

  • Structure and biodiversity of megabenthos in the Weddell and Lazarev Seas (Antarctica): ecological role of physical parameters and biological interactions

    Julian Gutt;Andreas Starmans

  • Methane emission and consumption at a North Sea gas seep (Tommeliten area)

    H. Niemann;H. Niemann;M. Elvert;M. Hovland;B. Orcutt

  • Some “driving forces” structuring communities of the sublittoral Antarctic macrobenthos

    Julian Gutt

  • Sponge associations in the eastern Weddell Sea

    Dagmar Barthel;Julian Gutt

  • Quantification of iceberg impact and benthic recolonisation patterns in the Weddell Sea (Antarctica)

    Julian Gutt;Andreas Starmans

  • Biodiversity change after climate-induced ice-shelf collapse in the Antarctic

    Julian Gutt;Iain Barratt;Eugene Domack;Cédric d'Udekem d'Acoz

  • Antarctic marine animal forests: three-dimensional communities in Southern Ocean ecosystems

    Julian Gutt;Vonda Cummings;P.K. Dayton;Enrique Isla

  • Mega-epibenthic communities in Arctic and Antarctic shelf areas

    A. Starmans;Julian Gutt;Wolf Arntz

  • Survey of deep-dwelling red coral (Corallium rubrum) populations at Cap de Creus (NW Mediterranean)

    Sergio Rossi;Georgios Tsounis;Covadonga Orejas;Tirma Padrón

  • Sponge Grounds as Key Marine Habitats: A Synthetic Review of Types, Structure, Functional Roles, and Conservation Concerns

    Manuel Maldonado;Ricardo Aguilar;Raymond J. Bannister;James J. Bell

  • The Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean

    C. De Broyer;P. Koubbi;H. Griffiths;B. Raymond

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolf Arntz
Wolf Arntz Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Peter Convey
Peter Convey British Antarctic Survey
Andrew Clarke
Andrew Clarke British Antarctic Survey
Colin Summerhayes
Colin Summerhayes University of Cambridge
John Turner
John Turner Natural Environment Research Council
Angelika Brandt
Angelika Brandt Universität Hamburg
Dominic A. Hodgson
Dominic A. Hodgson British Antarctic Survey
Thomas Brey
Thomas Brey University of Bremen
Huw J. Griffiths
Huw J. Griffiths British Antarctic Survey
Paul Andrew Mayewski
Paul Andrew Mayewski University of Maine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. Fields like geology and geoscience closely align with environmental studies, offering practical knowledge about earth systems. Programs like online geology degrees provide an excellent foundation for careers in environmental consulting, land management, and research.

For students seeking flexible and interdisciplinary study options, an affordable online general studies degree allows customization of coursework to include environmental topics alongside other relevant disciplines. This can be a strategic route for broadening expertise and career flexibility.

Some may also consider advancing in related social fields, where environmental justice and policy are important. Online programs such as dsw programs online provide pathways for leadership roles integrating social work with environmental advocacy.

Moreover, for those wondering about the time and effort involved, researching what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify programs that balance workload with career goals, potentially accelerating entry into the workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Julian Gutt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles