World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
28388
World Ranking
11824
National Ranking
1122

Paul L. Greenhaff publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Greenhaff sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 360 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul L. Greenhaff D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul L. Greenhaff sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul L. Greenhaff is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom and specializes in research spanning medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work focuses extensively on areas such as muscle metabolism and nutrition, nutrition and health in aging, diet and metabolism studies, cardiovascular and exercise physiology, frailty in older adults, adipose tissue and metabolism, and muscle physiology and disorders.

Significant recent publications by Greenhaff include:

  • Impact of sedentarism due to the COVID-19 home confinement on neuromuscular, cardiovascular and metabolic health: Physiological and pathophysiological implications and recommendations for physical and nutritional countermeasures, 2020, European Journal of Sport Science
  • Perioperative nutrition: Recommendations from the ESPEN expert group, 2020, Clinical Nutrition
  • Multisystem physiological perspective of human frailty and its modulation by physical activity, 2022, Physiological Reviews
  • Age-related changes in muscle architecture and metabolism in humans: The likely contribution of physical inactivity to age-related functional decline, 2021, Ageing Research Reviews
  • Muscle and tendon adaptations to moderate load eccentric vs. concentric resistance exercise in young and older males, 2021, GeroScience

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Greenhaff include:

  • Dumitru Constantin-Teodosiu
  • Philip J. Atherton
  • Despina Constantin
  • Kenneth Smith
  • Daniel J. Wilkinson

Greenhaff has published regularly in multiple scientific venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
  • British Journal of Surgery
  • Clinical Nutrition
  • GeroScience
  • The Journal of Physiology

The primary fields of study for Greenhaff's research include medicine and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology. Within these domains, they emphasize subfields such as physiology, cell biology, molecular biology, surgery, and complementary and alternative medicine. Their work addresses a wide range of topics including muscle metabolism and nutrition, addressing the physiological changes associated with aging, as well as the implications of frailty and inactivity.

Greenhaff's research contributions provide insights into how physical activity and nutrition impact muscle and metabolic health, particularly through understanding mechanisms underlying physical decline and adaptations across age groups.

Best Publications

  • Muscle creatine loading in men

    E. Hultman;K. Soderlund;J. A. Timmons;G. Cederblad

  • The effects of increasing exercise intensity on muscle fuel utilisation in humans

    Luc J. C. van Loon;Paul L. Greenhaff;D. Constantin-Teodosiu;Wim H. M. Saris

  • Effect of oral creatine supplementation on skeletal muscle phosphocreatine resynthesis.

    P. L. Greenhaff;K. Bodin;K. Soderlund;E. Hultman

  • Influence of oral creatine supplementation of muscle torque during repeated bouts- of maximal voluntary exercise in man

    Paul L. Greenhaff;Anna Casey;Anthony H. Short;Roger Harris

  • American College of Sports Medicine roundtable. The physiological and health effects of oral creatine supplementation.

    R.L. Terjung;P. Clarkson;E.R. Eichner;P.L. Greenhaff

  • Creatine ingestion favorably affects performance and muscle metabolism during maximal exercise in humans

    A. Casey;D. Constantin-Teodosiu;S. Howell;E. Hultman

  • Carbohydrate ingestion augments skeletal muscle creatine accumulation during creatine supplementation in humans.

    A L Green;E Hultman;I A Macdonald;Dean Alan Sewell

  • Disassociation between the effects of amino acids and insulin on signaling, ubiquitin ligases, and protein turnover in human muscle.

    Paul L. Greenhaff;Leonidas Karagounis;Nicholas Peirce;Elizabeth J Simpson

  • New insights concerning the role of carnitine in the regulation of fuel metabolism in skeletal muscle

    Francis B. Stephens;Dumitru Constantin-Teodosiu;Paul L. Greenhaff

  • Disuse atrophy and exercise rehabilitation in humans profoundly affects the expression of genes associated with the regulation of skeletal muscle mass

    Simon W. Jones;Roger J. Hill;Philip A. Krasney;Barbara O'Conner

  • Oral creatine supplementation facilitates the rehabilitation of disuse atrophy and alters the expression of muscle myogenic factors in humans.

    Peter Hespel;Bert Op't Eijnde;Marc Van Leemputte;Birgitte Ursø

  • The influence of dietary creatine supplementation on performance during repeated bouts of maximal isokinetic cycling in man

    R Birch;D Noble;P L Greenhaff

  • Using molecular classification to predict gains in maximal aerobic capacity following endurance exercise training in humans.

    James A. Timmons;James A. Timmons;Steen Knudsen;Tuomo Rankinen;Lauren Gerard Koch

  • Impact of sedentarism due to the COVID-19 home confinement on neuromuscular, cardiovascular and metabolic health: Physiological and pathophysiological implications and recommendations for physical and nutritional countermeasures.

    Marco Narici;Giuseppe De Vito;Martino Franchi;Antonio Paoli

  • Carbohydrate ingestion augments creatine retention during creatine feeding in humans

    A. L. Green;E. J. Simpson;J. J. Littlewood;I. A. Macdonald

  • The involvement of the ubiquitin proteasome system in human skeletal muscle remodelling and atrophy.

    Andrew Murton;D. Constantin;P. L. Greenhaff

  • Renal dysfunction accompanying oral creatine supplements

    Paul Greenhaff

  • Chronic oral ingestion of l‐carnitine and carbohydrate increases muscle carnitine content and alters muscle fuel metabolism during exercise in humans

    Benjamin T. Wall;Francis B. Stephens;Dumitru Constantin-Teodosiu;Kanagaraj Marimuthu

  • Branched-Chain Amino Acids as Fuels and Anabolic Signals in Human Muscle

    Michael J. Rennie;Julien Bohé;Ken Smith;Henning Wackerhage

  • Biochemistry of exercise and training

    Ron J. Maughan;Michael Gleeson;Paul L. Greenhaff.

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian A. Macdonald
Ian A. Macdonald National Institute for Health Research
Kenneth Smith
Kenneth Smith University of Nottingham
Ronald J. Maughan
Ronald J. Maughan University of St Andrews
Michael Gleeson
Michael Gleeson Loughborough University
Dileep N. Lobo
Dileep N. Lobo University of Nottingham
Luc J. C. van Loon
Luc J. C. van Loon Maastricht University
Michael J. Rennie
Michael J. Rennie University of Nottingham
Robert Layfield
Robert Layfield University of Nottingham
Anton J. M. Wagenmakers
Anton J. M. Wagenmakers Liverpool John Moores University
Ana M. Valdes
Ana M. Valdes University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in health professions beyond the traditional path to an MD, there are many flexible online options. Programs such as medical coding certification offer quick entry points into healthcare administration, allowing learners to upskill and access new job opportunities from home.

Nursing is another high-demand field with extensive online education opportunities. Prospective nurses can find affordable online nursing programs that provide foundational clinical skills and prepare you for licensure exams. Advanced practice nurses can explore the cheapest np school options, which make it easier to earn a nurse practitioner credential while managing work or family obligations.

For those aiming for leadership or research roles, phd in nursing online programs can open the door to academia, advanced clinical positions, or healthcare policy. By choosing the right online pathway, you can launch or advance a rewarding medical career tailored to your interests and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Paul L. Greenhaff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles