World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
37394
World Ranking
7988
National Ranking
782

Michael J. Rennie publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Rennie sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 387 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael J. Rennie D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Rennie sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Rennie was affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spanned the fields of Medicine and Engineering, with a focus on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine as well as Aerospace Engineering. Their scholarly contributions covered both broad disciplines and more specialized subfields.

The research topics addressed by Rennie included various aspects of sports science and aerospace engineering. Key subjects were Sports Performance and Training, Sports Injuries and Prevention, Sports Analytics and Performance, Sport Psychology and Performance, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Spacecraft Design and Technology, and Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems.

Rennie's published works appeared in various scientific venues. Frequent publication sources included the Journal of Sports Sciences, which featured two of their articles, and the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, also with two publications. Other places of publication included Science and Medicine in Football, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, and Sensors.

The following papers credited to Rennie reflect their research focus and timeline:

  • Phases of match-play in professional Australian Football: Distribution of physical and technical performance, 2020, Journal of Sports Sciences
  • Tactical analysis of individual and team behaviour in professional Australian Football, 2021, Science and Medicine in Football
  • The impact of using assimilated Aeolus wind data on regional WRF-Chem dust simulations, 2023, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Match simulation practice may not represent competitive match play in professional Australian football, 2021, Journal of Sports Sciences
  • Improving the interpretation of skill indicators in professional Australian Football, 2020, Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Throughout their career, Rennie collaborated frequently with various researchers. Notable co-authors included Mark L. Watsford, William B. Sheehan, Rhys Tribolet, Andrew R. Novak, and Job Fransen.

Best Publications

  • Acute Skeletal Muscle Wasting in Critical Illness

    Zudin A. Puthucheary;Jaikitry Rawal;Mark McPhail;Mark McPhail;Bronwen Connolly;Bronwen Connolly

  • Anabolic signaling deficits underlie amino acid resistance of wasting, aging muscle

    Daniel Cuthbertson;Kenneth Smith;Kenneth Smith;John Babraj;Graham Leese

  • Age‐related differences in the dose–response relationship of muscle protein synthesis to resistance exercise in young and old men

    Vinod Kumar;Anna Selby;Debbie Rankin;Rekha Patel

  • Dietary omega-3 fatty acid supplementation increases the rate of muscle protein synthesis in older adults: a randomized controlled trial

    Gordon I Smith;Philip Atherton;Dominic N Reeds;B Selma Mohammed

  • Differential effects of resistance and endurance exercise in the fed state on signalling molecule phosphorylation and protein synthesis in human muscle

    Sarah B. Wilkinson;Stuart M. Phillips;Philip J. Atherton;Rekha Patel

  • Coordinated collagen and muscle protein synthesis in human patella tendon and quadriceps muscle after exercise

    Benjamin F. Miller;Jens L. Olesen;Mette Hansen;Simon Døssing

  • Low-Load High Volume Resistance Exercise Stimulates Muscle Protein Synthesis More Than High-Load Low Volume Resistance Exercise in Young Men

    Nicholas A. Burd;Daniel W. D. West;Aaron W. Staples;Philip J. Atherton

  • Human Muscle Protein Synthesis is Modulated by Extracellular, Not Intramuscular Amino Acid Availability: A Dose‐Response Study

    Julien Bohé;Aili Low;Robert R. Wolfe;Michael J. Rennie

  • Selective activation of AMPK-PGC-1α or PKB-TSC2-mTOR signaling can explain specific adaptive responses to endurance or resistance training-like electrical muscle stimulation

    Philip J. Atherton;Philip J. Atherton;Philip J. Atherton;John A. Babraj;Kenneth Smith;Jaipaul Singh

  • Latency and duration of stimulation of human muscle protein synthesis during continuous infusion of amino acids.

    J Bohé;J F Low;R R Wolfe;M J Rennie

  • Disassociation between the effects of amino acids and insulin on signaling, ubiquitin ligases, and protein turnover in human muscle.

    Paul L. Greenhaff;Leonidas Karagounis;Nicholas Peirce;Elizabeth J Simpson

  • Protein and amino acid metabolism during and after exercise and the effects of nutrition.

    Michael J. Rennie;Kevin D. Tipton

  • Control of the Size of the Human Muscle Mass

    Michael J. Rennie;Henning Wackerhage;Espen E. Spangenburg;Frank W. Booth

  • Muscle protein synthesis measured by stable isotope techniques in man: the effects of feeding and fasting.

    M. J. Rennie;R. H. T. Edwards;D. Halliday;D. E. Matthews

  • Immobilization induces anabolic resistance in human myofibrillar protein synthesis with low and high dose amino acid infusion

    Elisa I. Glover;Stuart M. Phillips;Bryan R. Oates;Jason E. Tang

  • Muscle full effect after oral protein: time-dependent concordance and discordance between human muscle protein synthesis and mTORC1 signaling

    Philip J Atherton;Timothy Etheridge;Peter W Watt;Daniel Wilkinson

  • Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids augment the muscle protein anabolic response to hyperinsulinaemia-hyperaminoacidaemia in healthy young and middle-aged men and women

    Gordon I. Smith;Philip Atherton;Dominic N. Reeds;B. Selma Mohammed

  • Effect of growth hormone and resistance exercise on muscle growth in young men

    K. E. Yarasheski;J. A. Campbell;K. Smith;M. J. Rennie

  • Enhanced Amino Acid Sensitivity of Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Persists for up to 24 h after Resistance Exercise in Young Men

    Nicholas A. Burd;Daniel W. D. West;Daniel R. Moore;Philip J. Atherton

  • Alterations of protein turnover underlying disuse atrophy in human skeletal muscle

    Stuart M. Phillips;Elisa I. Glover;Michael J. Rennie

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth Smith
Kenneth Smith University of Nottingham
Stuart M. Phillips
Stuart M. Phillips McMaster University
Harinder S. Hundal
Harinder S. Hundal University of Dundee
Paul L. Greenhaff
Paul L. Greenhaff University of Nottingham
Hugh Montgomery
Hugh Montgomery University College London
John O. Holloszy
John O. Holloszy Washington University in St. Louis
Michael Kjaer
Michael Kjaer University of Copenhagen
John Moxham
John Moxham King's College London
Mark A. Tarnopolsky
Mark A. Tarnopolsky McMaster University
Marco V. Narici
Marco V. Narici University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the healthcare field continues to evolve, there are more opportunities than ever to pursue related online degrees for aspiring or practicing medical professionals. Flexible online programs can help you advance your career, switch specialties, or enter growing fields in medicine and healthcare.

For nurses looking to take on leadership roles, the cheapest dnp program options offer a practical way to earn advanced credentials without a significant financial burden. Pharmacists interested in gaining new expertise can explore accredited pharmd online programs, which are increasingly available remotely.

Data-driven careers are growing rapidly too. Earning your online mhi (Master’s in Health Information) can open the door to in-demand careers in medical data management and analysis. Those just starting out in healthcare may benefit from billing and coding classes online—a great entry point requiring minimal prerequisites.

These online pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and diverse career options for anyone interested in healthcare beyond traditional medical degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Rennie

Recently Published Articles