World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Luc J. C. van Loon

Luc J. C. van Loon

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
128
Citations
56043
World Ranking
2731
National Ranking
104

Luc J. C. van Loon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc J. C. van Loon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 658 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Luc J. C. van Loon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luc J. C. van Loon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 128 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Luc J. C. van Loon is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on various aspects of muscle metabolism, nutrition, and physiology within the fields of medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work spans multiple main topics, including:

  • Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Sports Performance and Training
  • Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Exercise and Physiological Responses
  • Adipose Tissue and Metabolism

Van Loon has contributed extensively to several subfields of study such as physiology, cell biology, orthopedics and sports medicine, molecular biology, and rehabilitation.

Frequently publishing in well-regarded venues, their work appears in these journals most often:

  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Journal of Nutrition
  • International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism
  • Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
  • Sports Medicine

Among the recent papers included in van Loon's body of work are:

  • The Anabolic Response to Plant-Based Protein Ingestion, 2021, Sports Medicine
  • Muscle Protein Synthesis after Protein Administration in Critical Illness, 2022, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Protein Type, Protein Dose, and Age Modulate Dietary Protein Digestion and Phenylalanine Absorption Kinetics and Plasma Phenylalanine Availability in Humans, 2020, Journal of Nutrition
  • Dose-response effects of dietary protein on muscle protein synthesis during recovery from endurance exercise in young men: a double-blind randomized trial, 2020, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Insects are a viable protein source for human consumption: from insect protein digestion to postprandial muscle protein synthesis in vivo in humans: a double-blind randomized trial, 2021, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Van Loon collaborates frequently with several coauthors who have contributed to numerous publications alongside them. These include:

  • Lex B. Verdijk
  • Joan M. Senden
  • Tim Snijders
  • Andrew M. Holwerda
  • Jorn Trommelen

Best Publications

  • The effects of increasing exercise intensity on muscle fuel utilisation in humans

    Luc J. C. van Loon;Paul L. Greenhaff;D. Constantin-Teodosiu;Wim H. M. Saris

  • IOC Consensus Statement: Dietary Supplements and the High-Performance Athlete

    Ronald J. Maughan;Louise M. Burke;Jiri Dvorak;D. Enette Larson-Meyer

  • Protein supplementation augments the adaptive response of skeletal muscle to resistance-type exercise training: a meta-analysis

    Naomi M. Cermak;Peter T. Res;Lisette C. P. G. M. de Groot;Wim H. M. Saris

  • Whey protein stimulates postprandial muscle protein accretion more effectively than do casein and casein hydrolysate in older men

    Bart Pennings;Yves Boirie;Joan M G Senden;Annemie P Gijsen

  • Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates

    Stefan H. M. Gorissen;Julie J. R. Crombag;Joan M. G. Senden;W. A. Huub Waterval

  • Dietary protein for athletes: From requirements to optimum adaptation

    Stuart M. Phillips;Luc J.C. Van Loon

  • The decline in skeletal muscle mass with aging is mainly attributed to a reduction in type II muscle fiber size.

    Rachel Nilwik;Tim Snijders;Marika Leenders;Bart B.L. Groen

  • The Skeletal Muscle Anabolic Response to Plant- versus Animal-Based Protein Consumption

    Stephan van Vliet;Stephan van Vliet;Nicholas A. Burd;Nicholas A. Burd;Luc J. C. van Loon

  • Protein supplementation increases muscle mass gain during prolonged resistance-type exercise training in frail elderly people: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Michael Tieland;Marlou L. Dirks;Nikita L. Van Der Zwaluw;Lex B. Verdijk

  • Satellite cell content is specifically reduced in type II skeletal muscle fibers in the elderly

    Lex B. Verdijk;René Koopman;Gert Schaart;Kenneth Meijer

  • Maximizing postexercise muscle glycogen synthesis: carbohydrate supplementation and the application of amino acid or protein hydrolysate mixtures

    L.J.C. van Loon;W.H.M. Saris;M. Kruijshoop;A.J.M. Wagenmakers

  • Combined ingestion of protein and free leucine with carbohydrate increases postexercise muscle protein synthesis in vivo in male subjects

    René Koopman;Anton J. M. Wagenmakers;Ralph J. F. Manders;Antoine H. G. Zorenc

  • Plasma insulin responses after ingestion of different amino acid or protein mixtures with carbohydrate

    L.J.C. van Loon;W.H.M. Saris;H. Verhagen;A.J.M. Wagenmakers

  • Nutrition and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia: systematic review.

    Charlotte Beaudart;Charlotte Beaudart;A. Dawson;S. C. Shaw;Nicholas C. Harvey

  • Protein Supplementation Improves Physical Performance in Frail Elderly People: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Michael Tieland;Ondine van de Rest;Marlou L. Dirks;Nikita van der Zwaluw

  • Validity and Reliability of Tools to Measure Muscle Mass, Strength, and Physical Performance in Community-Dwelling Older People: A Systematic Review

    Donja M. Mijnarends;Judith M.M. Meijers;Ruud J.G. Halfens;Sovianne ter Borg

  • Patients with type 2 diabetes show a greater decline in muscle mass, muscle strength, and functional capacity with aging.

    Marika Leenders;Lex B. Verdijk;Letty van der Hoeven;Jos J. Adam

  • Aging, exercise, and muscle protein metabolism

    René Koopman;Luc J. C. van Loon

  • Nitrate Supplementation’s Improvement of 10-km Time-Trial Performance in Trained Cyclists

    Naomi M. Cermak;Martin J. Gibala;Luc J.C. van Loon

  • Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy Following Resistance Training Is Accompanied by a Fiber Type–Specific Increase in Satellite Cell Content in Elderly Men

    Lex B. Verdijk;Benjamin G. Gleeson;Richard A. M. Jonkers;Kenneth Meijer

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisette C. P. G. M. de Groot
Lisette C. P. G. M. de Groot Wageningen University & Research
Wim H. M. Saris
Wim H. M. Saris Maastricht University
Anton J. M. Wagenmakers
Anton J. M. Wagenmakers Liverpool John Moores University
Annemie M. W. J. Schols
Annemie M. W. J. Schols Maastricht University
Cornelis H.C. Dejong
Cornelis H.C. Dejong Maastricht University
Wim A. Buurman
Wim A. Buurman Maastricht University
Coen D.A. Stehouwer
Coen D.A. Stehouwer Maastricht University
Asker E. Jeukendrup
Asker E. Jeukendrup Loughborough University
Paul L. Greenhaff
Paul L. Greenhaff University of Nottingham
Romain Meeusen
Romain Meeusen Vrije Universiteit Brussel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering alternatives or complementary career paths to studying Medicine in the USA, there are several accessible and flexible online degree options available. Nursing continues to be a popular choice, with many seeking easiest nursing schools to get into, offering a less competitive entry point into healthcare roles. If standardized tests are a concern, it’s possible to find nursing school no entrance exam programs that make starting your journey even more straightforward.

Beyond direct patient care, administrative pathways such as billing, coding, and management are in high demand. Many students look for accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid to enter the healthcare industry with strong job prospects and flexible study options. Additionally, those looking to advance more quickly may be interested in online health administration programs, which can lead to leadership roles in healthcare organizations.

Each of these pathways offers unique opportunities, lower entry barriers, and valuable career prospects within the growing healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Luc J. C. van Loon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles