World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8326 7824 813 776 551 33504

John Moxham publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Moxham between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Moxham published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2012. 6 of the 561 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2012. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 16 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 21 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1969 2025

561 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Moxham: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 2
1980 3
1981 5
1982 2
1983 4
1984 3
1985 10
1986 11
1987 11
1988 16
1989 9
1990 6
1991 7
1992 5
1993 9
1994 12
1995 8
1996 11
1997 9
1998 5
1999 16
2000 13
2001 21
2002 15
2003 16
2004 14
2005 11
2006 14
2007 13
2008 15
2009 16
2010 21
2011 26
2012 32
2013 22
2014 24
2015 28
2016 30
2017 16
2018 10
2019 12
2020 10
2021 6
2022 3
2023 2
2024 2
2025 4
Total 561
Download as CSV

John Moxham publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Moxham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 551 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 551
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

John Moxham D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Moxham sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Moxham is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medical sciences, with a significant concentration in pulmonary and respiratory medicine. The scope of their work also extends to related subfields such as endocrine and autonomic systems, physiology, oncology, and public health.

The main areas of research undertaken by John Moxham include:

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Dysphagia Assessment and Management

Their notable recent publications are:

  • Lung volume reduction surgery versus endobronchial valves: a randomised controlled trial, 2023, European Respiratory Journal
  • The load and capacity model of healthcare delivery: considerations for the crisis management of the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Journal of Thoracic Disease
  • Autotitrating external positive end-expiratory airway pressure to abolish expiratory flow limitation during tidal breathing in patients with severe COPD: a physiological study, 2020, European Respiratory Journal
  • A rational approach to e-cigarettes: challenging ERS policy on tobacco harm reduction, 2020, European Respiratory Journal
  • Noninvasive Assessment of Neuromechanical Coupling and Mechanical Efficiency of Parasternal Intercostal Muscle during Inspiratory Threshold Loading, 2021, Sensors

John Moxham frequently collaborates with several other researchers, including:

  • Caroline J. Jolley
  • Joerg Steier
  • Gerrard F. Rafferty
  • Eui-Sik Suh
  • Patrick B. Murphy

Their work has been published most often in the following venues:

  • European Respiratory Journal
  • Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology
  • Journal of Thoracic Disease
  • BMC Medicine
  • EClinicalMedicine

Their contributions reflect multidisciplinary insights into respiratory health, with a focus on both clinical and physiological aspects. This includes examining advanced therapeutic approaches and healthcare delivery models, especially relevant during healthcare crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Best Publications

  • Acute Skeletal Muscle Wasting in Critical Illness

    Zudin A. Puthucheary;Jaikitry Rawal;Mark McPhail;Mark McPhail;Bronwen Connolly;Bronwen Connolly

  • Randomised controlled trial of nasal ventilation in acute ventilatory failure due to chronic obstructive airways disease

    J. Bott;M.P. Carroll;J.H. Conway;S.E.J. Keilty

  • Quadriceps strength predicts mortality in patients with moderate to severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    Elisabeth Bryony Swallow;Diana Reyes;Nicholas S Hopkinson;William Ding-Cheong Man

  • An integrated palliative and respiratory care service for patients with advanced disease and refractory breathlessness: a randomised controlled trial.

    Irene J Higginson;Claudia Bausewein;Claudia Bausewein;Charles C Reilly;Wei Gao

  • The prevalence of quadriceps weakness in COPD and the relationship with disease severity

    John Seymour;M. A. Spruit;N. S. Hopkinson;S. A. Natanek

  • Respiratory muscle strength and ventilatory failure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    R A Lyall;N Donaldson;M I Polkey;P N Leigh

  • Community pulmonary rehabilitation after hospitalisation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled study

    William D.-C. Man;Michael I. Polkey;Nora Donaldson;Barry J. Gray

  • Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area and the relationship with quadriceps strength in COPD

    John M Seymour;Katie Ward;Paul Sidhu;Zudin Puthucheary

  • Quadriceps wasting and physical inactivity in patients with COPD

    Dinesh Shrikrishna;Mehul Patel;Rebecca J. Tanner;John M. Seymour

  • Outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation following acute exacerbations of COPD

    John M. Seymour;Lauren Moore;Caroline J. Jolley;Katie Ward

  • The maximal sniff in the assessment of diaphragm function in man.

    Juliet M. Miller;John Moxham;Malcolm Green

  • The management of motor neurone disease

    PN Leigh;S Abrahams;A Al-Chalabi;MA Ampong

  • Effect of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction on Dynamic Hyperinflation and Exercise in Emphysema

    Nicholas S. Hopkinson;Tudor P. Toma;David M. Hansell;Peter Goldstraw

  • Measurement of respiratory muscle strength.

    M I Polkey;M Green;J Moxham

  • A prospective study of quality of life in ALS patients treated with noninvasive ventilation

    R A Lyall;N Donaldson;T Fleming;C Wood

  • Diaphragm strength in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    Michael I. Polkey;Dimitris Kyroussis;Carl-Hugo Hamnegard;Gary H. Mills

  • The value of multiple tests of respiratory muscle strength

    Joerg Steier;Sundeep Kaul;John Seymour;Caroline Jolley

  • Measurement of twitch transdiaphragmatic, esophageal, and endotracheal tube pressure with bilateral anterolateral magnetic phrenic nerve stimulation in patients in the intensive care unit.

    Anna C. Watson;Philip D. Hughes;M. Louise Harris;Nicholas Hart

  • The respiratory muscles.

    Green M;Moxham J

  • The Prevalence of Quadriceps Weakness in COPD and the Relationship with Disease Severity.

    JM Seymour;MA Spruit;NS Hopkinson;A Sathyapala

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael I. Polkey
Michael I. Polkey National Institutes of Health
Malcolm L. H. Green
Malcolm L. H. Green University of Oxford
Hugh Montgomery
Hugh Montgomery University College London
Anne Greenough
Anne Greenough King's College London
Lalit Kalra
Lalit Kalra King's College London
Irene J Higginson
Irene J Higginson King's College London
Philip Hughes
Philip Hughes University of Manchester
Nanshan Zhong
Nanshan Zhong Guangzhou Medical University
Annemie M. W. J. Schols
Annemie M. W. J. Schols Maastricht University
Wei Gao
Wei Gao University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a medical-related career but aren’t sure about the traditional MD route, there are several flexible and rewarding alternatives to consider. Many students are now exploring roles as nurses, healthcare administrators, or medical coders—fields with growing demand and diverse online study options.

For those looking for accessible entry points into the nursing profession, it’s worth researching what is the easiest nursing school to get into. Some programs even waive stressful entrance exams, and you can learn more about nursing programs without teas requirements.

If you prefer a business or administrative role, a healthcare administration degree can often be completed online in an accelerated format, preparing you for leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, and more. Additionally, those interested in medical office work can find online medical coding classes with financial aid to get started quickly and affordably.

These pathways offer flexibility and great career prospects for students looking for alternatives to traditional medical degrees.

Best Scientists Citing John Moxham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles