World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
15432
World Ranking
2891
National Ranking
278

Lalit Kalra publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lalit Kalra sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 204 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lalit Kalra D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lalit Kalra sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lalit Kalra is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and has concentrated their research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans various subfields including Rehabilitation, Epidemiology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Neurology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The major topics covered in Kalra's research encompass Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Acute Ischemic Stroke Management, Cephalopods and Marine Biology, Chemical Synthesis and Alkaloids, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders, and Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications.

Kalra has contributed to publications in several scientific venues, with papers appearing in journals such as Science Advances, European Stroke Journal, JAMA Neurology, Diagnostics, and the Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases.

Selected recent papers by Lalit Kalra include:

  • Cuttlefish use stereopsis to strike at prey, 2020, Science Advances
  • Preventive antibiotic therapy in acute stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data of randomized controlled trials, 2021, European Stroke Journal
  • Antithrombotic Treatment for Cervical Artery Dissection, 2024, JAMA Neurology
  • Subacute Changes in N-Acetylaspartate (NAA) Following Ischemic Stroke: A Serial MR Spectroscopy Pilot Study, 2020, Diagnostics
  • Using the Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale as Outcome Measures for Stroke Rehabilitation Trials; A Comparison of Minimum Sample Size Requirements, 2021, Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Collaboration is evident in Kalra's work, with frequent co-authors including Rachael C. Feord, Mary E. Sumner, Siddhant Pusdekar, Paloma T. Gonzalez-Bellido, and Trevor J. Wardill.

Best Publications

  • Collaborative systematic review of the randomised trials of organised in-patient (stroke unit) care after stroke.

    K Asplund;P Berman;C Blomstrand;M Dennis

  • Early Assessments of Dysphagia and Aspiration Risk in Acute Stroke Patients

    Deborah J.C. Ramsey;David G. Smithard;Lalit Kalra

  • Training carers of stroke patients: randomised controlled trial.

    Lalit Kalra;Andrew Evans;Inigo Perez;Anne Melbourn

  • Determinants of Caregiving Burden and Quality of Life in Caregivers of Stroke Patients

    Emily McCullagh;Gavin Brigstocke;Nora Donaldson;Lalit Kalra

  • Stroke: Working toward a prioritized world agenda

    Vladimir Hachinski;Geoffrey A. Donnan;Philip B. Gorelick;Werner Hacke

  • Diagnosis of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia: Recommendations From the Pneumonia in Stroke Consensus Group

    Craig J. Smith;Amit K. Kishore;Andy Vail;Angel Chamorro

  • How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials

    K Asplund;P Berman;C Blomstrand;M Dennis

  • Silent aspiration: what do we know?

    Deborah Ramsey;Deborah Ramsey;David Smithard;Lalit Kalra

  • Anatomical predictors of aphasia recovery: a tractography study of bilateral perisylvian language networks.

    Stephanie J. Forkel;Stephanie J. Forkel;Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Michel Thiebaut de Schotten;Flavio Dell’Acqua;Flavio Dell’Acqua;Lalit Kalra

  • Prophylactic antibiotics after acute stroke for reducing pneumonia in patients with dysphagia (STROKE-INF): a prospective, cluster-randomised, open-label, masked endpoint, controlled clinical trial

    Lalit Kalra;Saddif Irshad;John Hodsoll;John Hodsoll;Matthew Simpson

  • The Influence of Visual Neglect on Stroke Rehabilitation

    L. Kalra;I. Perez;S. Gupta;M. Wittink

  • A multicentre observational study of presentation and early assessment of acute stroke

    Farzaneh Harraf;Anil K Sharma;Martin M Brown;Kennedy R Lees

  • Prevalence of stroke and related burden among older people living in Latin America, India and China

    Cleusa P Ferri;Claudia Schoenborn;Lalit Kalra;Daisy Acosta

  • Alternative strategies for stroke care: a prospective randomised controlled trial.

    Lalit Kalra;Andrew Evans;Inigo Perez;Martin R J. Knapp

  • A randomized controlled trial of an enhanced balance training program to improve mobility and reduce falls in elderly patients

    Jayne Steadman;Nora Donaldson;Lalit Kalra

  • Medical Complications During Stroke Rehabilitation

    Lalit Kalra;Gloria Yu;Koo Wilson;Pauline Roots

  • Acute treatment and long-term management of stroke in developing countries

    Michael Brainin;Yvonne Teuschl;Lalit Kalra

  • Prospective cohort study to determine if trial efficacy of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation translates into clinical effectiveness.

    Lalit Kalra;Gloria Yu;Inigo Perez;Anil Lakhani

  • The Economic Burden of Stroke in the United Kingdom

    Penny Youman;Koo Wilson;Farzaneh Harraf;Lalit Kalra

  • Cognitive function and hypertension.

    J. Birns;Lalit Kalra

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
John Moxham
John Moxham King's College London
Andrew Evans
Andrew Evans University of Dundee
Peter Langhorne
Peter Langhorne University of Glasgow
Hugh S. Markus
Hugh S. Markus University of Cambridge
Terrence Forrester
Terrence Forrester University of the West Indies
Andreas Meisel
Andreas Meisel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ajay M. Shah
Ajay M. Shah King's College London
Charles D.A. Wolfe
Charles D.A. Wolfe King's College London
Anthony Rudd
Anthony Rudd King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to multiple academic routes, many of which can be pursued flexibly. Accelerated online degrees are a great option for those who want to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner, including options closely related to neuroscience.

If career earnings are a top priority, it's helpful to look at the highest paid degrees for bachelor’s graduates, as well as consider some less conventional but lucrative options among the fun majors in college that pay well. Neuroscience and related fields like biotechnology or cognitive science are often included due to growing job demand in tech, healthcare, and research.

For those looking for affordable ways to study, there are many accredited online colleges that accept fafsa, making a quality neuroscience education more accessible. Weigh your interests, financial goals, and study preferences carefully to chart the career pathway that best suits your ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Lalit Kalra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles