World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 137 1903 1774 198 190 1273 74297

Martin Knapp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Knapp between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Knapp published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 33.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 138 publications in 2014. 62 of the 1,665 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 138. Peak 138 publications in 2014. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 5 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 17 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 9 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 20 publications 1994: 22 publications 1995: 24 publications 1996: 39 publications 1997: 31 publications 1998: 28 publications 1999: 35 publications 2000: 38 publications 2001: 54 publications 2002: 54 publications 2003: 40 publications 2004: 47 publications 2005: 58 publications 2006: 44 publications 2007: 71 publications 2008: 49 publications 2009: 42 publications 2010: 40 publications 2011: 45 publications 2012: 47 publications 2013: 68 publications 2014: 138 publications 2015: 125 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 50 publications 2018: 45 publications 2019: 39 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 37 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 42 publications 2025: 20 publications
1976 2025

1,665 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Knapp: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 5
1978 4
1979 2
1980 2
1981 6
1982 7
1983 6
1984 17
1985 5
1986 9
1987 11
1988 6
1989 6
1990 14
1991 11
1992 12
1993 20
1994 22
1995 24
1996 39
1997 31
1998 28
1999 35
2000 38
2001 54
2002 54
2003 40
2004 47
2005 58
2006 44
2007 71
2008 49
2009 42
2010 40
2011 45
2012 47
2013 68
2014 138
2015 125
2016 32
2017 50
2018 45
2019 39
2020 41
2021 34
2022 37
2023 42
2024 42
2025 20
Total 1,665
Download as CSV

Martin Knapp publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Knapp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,261–1,280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,273 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27 1,273
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Knapp D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Knapp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 136–137 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 137 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159 137
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Martin Knapp is affiliated with the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom. The primary fields of study for this researcher include Medicine, Health Professions, and Social Sciences, with notable subfields such as General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Economics and Econometrics, Health, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research covers several key topics, most prominently Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life, as well as Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes. Other significant areas include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving, Global Health Care Issues, and Healthcare Innovation and Challenges.

The following recent papers exemplify their contributions to these topics:

  • The worldwide costs of dementia in 2019, 2023, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Economics and mental health: the current scenario, 2020, World Psychiatry
  • LSE-Lancet Commission on the future of the NHS: re-laying the foundations for an equitable and efficient health and care service after COVID-19, 2021, The Lancet
  • Mobilising social support to improve mental health for children and adolescents: A systematic review using principles of realist synthesis, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Dementia wellbeing and COVID-19: Review and expert consensus on current research and knowledge gaps, 2021, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors working with Martin Knapp include:

  • Adelina Comas-Herrera
  • Catherine Henderson
  • Gloria Hoi Yan Wong
  • Raphael Wittenberg
  • Annette Bauer

The researcher publishes regularly in several academic venues, most notably:

  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Dementia
  • BMC Geriatrics
  • BMJ Open
  • Research Square (Research Square)

An award received by Martin Knapp is the Fellowship of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010

    Anders Gustavsson;Mikael Svensson;Frank Jacobi;Christer Allgulander

  • Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency

    Shekhar Saxena;Graham Thornicroft;Martin Knapp;Harvey Whiteford

  • Defeating Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society

    Bengt Winblad;Bengt Winblad;Philippe Amouyel;Sandrine Andrieu;Clive Ballard

  • Costs of Autism Spectrum Disorders in the United Kingdom and the United States

    Ariane V. S. Buescher;Zuleyha Cidav;Zuleyha Cidav;Martin Knapp;David S. Mandell;David S. Mandell

  • Financial cost of social exclusion: follow up study of antisocial children into adulthood.

    Stephen Scott;Martin Knapp;Juliet Henderson;Barbara Maughan

  • Costing psychiatric interventions.

    Jennifer Beecham;Martin R J. Knapp

  • Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review.

    Emilie Courtin;Martin Knapp

  • Poverty and mental disorders: breaking the cycle in low-income and middle-income countries

    Crick Lund;Mary De Silva;Sophie Plagerson;Sara Cooper

  • World Alzheimer report 2016: improving healthcare for people living with dementia: coverage, quality and costs now and in the future

    Martin James Prince;Adelina Comas-Herrera;Martin Knapp;Maelenn Mari Guerchet

  • Donepezil and memantine for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease.

    Robert Howard;Rupert McShane;James Lindesay;Craig Ritchie

  • The effectiveness of supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial

    Tom Burns;Jocelyn Catty;Thomas Becker;Robert E Drake

  • Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders: recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    David S. Baldwin;Ian M. Anderson;David J. Nutt;Borwin Bandelow

  • The Global Costs of Schizophrenia

    Martin Knapp;Roshni Mangalore;Judit Simon

  • Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology.

    S C Smith;D L Lamping;S Banerjee;R Harwood

  • Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial

    Adam Steventon;Martin Bardsley;John Billings;Jennifer Dixon

  • Projections of multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035: estimates from the Population Ageing and Care Simulation (PACSim) model

    Andrew Kingston;Louise Robinson;Heather Booth;Martin Knapp

  • Training carers of stroke patients: randomised controlled trial.

    Lalit Kalra;Andrew Evans;Inigo Perez;Anne Melbourn

  • Sertraline or mirtazapine for depression in dementia (HTA-SADD): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Sube Banerjee;Jennifer Hellier;Michael Dewey;Renee Romeo

  • Long-term conditions and mental health: the cost of co-morbidities

    Chris Naylor;Michael Parsonage;David McDaid;Martin Knapp

  • Paying the price: the cost of mental health care in England to 2026

    Paul R. McCrone;Sujith Dhanasiri;Anita Patel;Martin Knapp

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer Beecham
Jennifer Beecham University of Kent
David McDaid
David McDaid London School of Economics and Political Science
Paul McCrone
Paul McCrone King's College London
David Challis
David Challis University of Nottingham
Ann Netten
Ann Netten University of Kent
Graham Dunn
Graham Dunn University of Manchester
Sube Banerjee
Sube Banerjee Plymouth University
Raphael Wittenberg
Raphael Wittenberg London School of Economics and Political Science
Graham Thornicroft
Graham Thornicroft King's College London
Janet Robertson
Janet Robertson Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean attending a traditional medical school. Numerous related degrees and career paths are available online, offering flexibility and a faster route into healthcare fields. For example, aspiring pharmacists can pursue a 3 year online pharmd program, which allows you to earn your doctorate in pharmacy through a convenient and affordable format.

If you’re interested in healthcare administration, obtaining rhia certification programs online is an excellent option. These programs train you in health information management, preparing you for leadership roles in managing medical records and patient data.

Medical billing and coding is another in-demand field. Knowing the average cost of medical billing and coding program can help you compare options and find a program that fits your budget, with many affordable choices available fully online.

For those aiming to become advanced practice nurses, researching the cheapest online np programs can help you access high-quality nurse practitioner training without excessive student debt.

Exploring these alternative online pathways can help you join the healthcare workforce more quickly, with options to suit various interests and budgets.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Knapp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles