World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
8458
World Ranking
3416
National Ranking
580

Ann Netten publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Netten sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 301 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ann Netten D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Netten sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Ann Netten is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. The academic profile of this researcher includes recognition as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom.

The available data does not list specific papers, co-authors, publication venues, or books associated with Ann Netten. Likewise, there is no detailed information on the main fields or subfields of study, nor the main topics of their research work.

This profile adheres strictly to the data provided, presenting a concise factual overview based on verified information.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme: Final Report

    Caroline Glendinning;David Challis;José-Luis Fernández;Sally Jacobs

  • Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme

    C Glendinning;DJ Challis;J. L. Fernandez;SR Jacobs

  • Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.

    Ann Netten;Peter Burge;Juliette Malley;Demetris Potoglou

  • Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome--An application to social care for older people

    Mandy Ryan;Ann Netten;Diane Skåtun;Paul Smith

  • Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: An empirical comparison using social care data

    Dimitris Potoglou;Peter Burge;Terry Flynn;Anne Netten

  • An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older people

    Juliette N Malley;Juliette N Malley;Ann-Marie Towers;Ann P Netten;John E Brazier

  • An exploratory evaluation of restorative justice schemes

    David Robert Miers;Mike Maguire;Shelagh Goldie;Karen Sharpe

  • Quality and costs of supported living residences and group homes in the United Kingdom.

    Eric Emerson;Janet Robertson;Nicky Gregory;Chris Hatton

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2003

    A.P. Netten;Lesley A. Curtis

  • The Expected Working Life of a Social Worker

    Lesley Curtis;Joanna Moriarty;Ann Netten

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2006

    Lesley A. Curtis;A.P. Netten

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2005

    Lesley A. Curtis;A.P. Netten

  • The quality and costs of community-based residential supports and residential campuses for people with severe and complex disabilities.

    Eric Emerson;Janet Robertson;Nicky Gregory;Sophia Kessissoglou

  • Raising the Quality of Home Care: A Study of Service Users’ Views

    Jennifer Francis;Ann Netten

  • Personalisation through Individual Budgets: Does It Work and for Whom?

    Ann Netten;Karen Jones;Martin Knapp;Jose Luis Fernandez

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2002

    A.P. Netten;Lesley A. Curtis

  • Assessing the Role of Increasing Choice in English Social Care Services

    Martin Stevens;Caroline Glendinning;Sally Jacobs;Nicola Moran

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2001

    A.P. Netten;T. Rees;G. Harrison

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2000

    A.P. Netten;Lesley A. Curtis

  • The Personal Social Services Research Unit

    Angela Hallam;Robin Darton;E. McIntosh;Ann Netten

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 1998

    A.P. Netten;J.H. Dennett;J. Knight

  • Younger Adults' Understanding of Questions for a Service User Experience Survey. Funded/commissioned by: The Health and Social Care Information Centre

    Juliette Malley;Sima Sandhu;Ann Netten

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
David Challis
David Challis University of Nottingham
Caroline Glendinning
Caroline Glendinning University of York
Jill Manthorpe
Jill Manthorpe King's College London
Janet Robertson
Janet Robertson Lancaster University
Chris Hatton
Chris Hatton Manchester Metropolitan University
Eric Emerson
Eric Emerson Lancaster University
Julie Beadle-Brown
Julie Beadle-Brown University of Kent
Jennifer Beecham
Jennifer Beecham University of Kent
Justine Schneider
Justine Schneider University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees that can quickly launch or advance your career. Students concerned about affordability will find it useful to research how much does a masters in psychology cost, as tuition rates can vary widely depending on the institution and program format.

For students seeking faster ways to earn their credentials, there are opportunities such as accelerated online degree programs. These allow motivated learners to complete their undergraduate studies in a shorter timeframe.

At the graduate level, those interested in educational leadership or academia can explore accelerated edd programs to earn their Doctor of Education online, often in less time than traditional formats. Similarly, there are many online masters programs that offer one-year completion tracks, helping students gain advanced skills and credentials efficiently.

Whether you're planning to enter psychology, education, or another social science field, online degree pathways provide flexible, cost-effective, and accelerated routes to a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Netten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles