World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3416 3146 580 531 301 8458

Ann Netten publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ann Netten between 1989 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ann Netten published across 31 years, from 1989 to 2019, averaging 9.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2007. 5 of the 304 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2007. 1989: 5 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 1 publication
1989 2019

304 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ann Netten: publications per year, 1989 to 2019
Year Publications
1989 5
1990 3
1991 2
1992 4
1993 12
1994 8
1995 7
1996 9
1997 12
1998 8
1999 13
2000 17
2001 16
2002 15
2003 10
2004 6
2005 14
2006 9
2007 22
2008 17
2009 16
2010 20
2011 21
2012 15
2013 5
2014 5
2015 3
2016 2
2017 3
2018 4
2019 1
Total 304
Download as CSV

Ann Netten publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Netten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 294–303 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 301 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106 301
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ann Netten D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Netten sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Ann Netten is affiliated with the University of Kent in the United Kingdom. The academic profile of this researcher includes recognition as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom.

The available data does not list specific papers, co-authors, publication venues, or books associated with Ann Netten. Likewise, there is no detailed information on the main fields or subfields of study, nor the main topics of their research work.

This profile adheres strictly to the data provided, presenting a concise factual overview based on verified information.

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme: Final Report

    Caroline Glendinning;David Challis;José-Luis Fernández;Sally Jacobs

  • Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme

    C Glendinning;DJ Challis;J. L. Fernandez;SR Jacobs

  • Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.

    Ann Netten;Peter Burge;Juliette Malley;Demetris Potoglou

  • Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome--An application to social care for older people

    Mandy Ryan;Ann Netten;Diane Skåtun;Paul Smith

  • Best-worst scaling vs. discrete choice experiments: An empirical comparison using social care data

    Dimitris Potoglou;Peter Burge;Terry Flynn;Anne Netten

  • An assessment of the construct validity of the ASCOT measure of social care-related quality of life with older people

    Juliette N Malley;Juliette N Malley;Ann-Marie Towers;Ann P Netten;John E Brazier

  • An exploratory evaluation of restorative justice schemes

    David Robert Miers;Mike Maguire;Shelagh Goldie;Karen Sharpe

  • Quality and costs of supported living residences and group homes in the United Kingdom.

    Eric Emerson;Janet Robertson;Nicky Gregory;Chris Hatton

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2003

    A.P. Netten;Lesley A. Curtis

  • The Expected Working Life of a Social Worker

    Lesley Curtis;Joanna Moriarty;Ann Netten

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2006

    Lesley A. Curtis;A.P. Netten

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2005

    Lesley A. Curtis;A.P. Netten

  • The quality and costs of community-based residential supports and residential campuses for people with severe and complex disabilities.

    Eric Emerson;Janet Robertson;Nicky Gregory;Sophia Kessissoglou

  • Raising the Quality of Home Care: A Study of Service Users’ Views

    Jennifer Francis;Ann Netten

  • Personalisation through Individual Budgets: Does It Work and for Whom?

    Ann Netten;Karen Jones;Martin Knapp;Jose Luis Fernandez

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2002

    A.P. Netten;Lesley A. Curtis

  • Assessing the Role of Increasing Choice in English Social Care Services

    Martin Stevens;Caroline Glendinning;Sally Jacobs;Nicola Moran

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2001

    A.P. Netten;T. Rees;G. Harrison

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2000

    A.P. Netten;Lesley A. Curtis

  • The Personal Social Services Research Unit

    Angela Hallam;Robin Darton;E. McIntosh;Ann Netten

  • Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 1998

    A.P. Netten;J.H. Dennett;J. Knight

  • Younger Adults' Understanding of Questions for a Service User Experience Survey. Funded/commissioned by: The Health and Social Care Information Centre

    Juliette Malley;Sima Sandhu;Ann Netten

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
David Challis
David Challis University of Nottingham
Caroline Glendinning
Caroline Glendinning University of York
Jill Manthorpe
Jill Manthorpe King's College London
Janet Robertson
Janet Robertson Lancaster University
Chris Hatton
Chris Hatton Manchester Metropolitan University
Eric Emerson
Eric Emerson Lancaster University
Julie Beadle-Brown
Julie Beadle-Brown University of Kent
Jennifer Beecham
Jennifer Beecham University of Kent
Justine Schneider
Justine Schneider University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide variety of online degrees that can quickly launch or advance your career. Students concerned about affordability will find it useful to research how much does a masters in psychology cost, as tuition rates can vary widely depending on the institution and program format.

For students seeking faster ways to earn their credentials, there are opportunities such as accelerated online degree programs. These allow motivated learners to complete their undergraduate studies in a shorter timeframe.

At the graduate level, those interested in educational leadership or academia can explore accelerated edd programs to earn their Doctor of Education online, often in less time than traditional formats. Similarly, there are many online masters programs that offer one-year completion tracks, helping students gain advanced skills and credentials efficiently.

Whether you're planning to enter psychology, education, or another social science field, online degree pathways provide flexible, cost-effective, and accelerated routes to a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Netten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles