World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
25525
World Ranking
16082
National Ranking
177

Nick S. Macklon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick S. Macklon sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 364 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nick S. Macklon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick S. Macklon sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nick S. Macklon is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, focusing primarily on the field of Medicine with a strong emphasis on reproductive health. Their research covers subfields including Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Immunology, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work is concentrated on topics such as Reproductive Biology and Fertility, Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy, Ovarian function and disorders, Reproductive Health and Technologies, Reproductive System and Pregnancy, Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management, and Renal and related cancers.

Key recent publications include:

  • ESHRE good practice recommendations on recurrent implantation failure, 2023, Human Reproduction Open
  • Incubator type affects human blastocyst formation and embryo metabolism: a randomized controlled trial, 2022, Human Reproduction
  • Development, implementation and initial feasibility testing of the MediEmo mobile application to provide support during medically assisted reproduction, 2022, Human Reproduction
  • Resolving recurrent implantation failure, 2025, Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • Reassessing the conventional fertilization check: leveraging preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to increase the number of transferrable embryos, 2024, Reproductive BioMedicine Online

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Nick S. Macklon include:

  • Kamal Ahuja
  • Elena Linara-Demakakou
  • Balsam Al Hashimi
  • Simon C. Harvey
  • Katie E. Harvey

Publications by Nick S. Macklon have appeared predominantly in the journals Human Reproduction and Reproductive BioMedicine Online, with additional contributions to Human Reproduction Open, Human Reproduction Update, and Fertility and Sterility. The number of publications in these venues reflects a consistent contribution to reproductive science literature.

Best Publications

  • A meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

    C.M. Boomsma;M.J.C. Eijkemans;E.G. Hughes;G.H.A. Visser

  • Conception to ongoing pregnancy: the ‘black box’ of early pregnancy loss

    N S Macklon;J P M Geraedts;B C J M Fauser

  • Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial

    Esther B. Baart;Elena Martini;Marinus J Eijkemans;Diane Van Opstal

  • The science behind 25 years of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

    Nick S. Macklon;Richard L. Stouffer;Linda C. Giudice;Bart C. J. M. Fauser

  • New insights into mechanisms behind miscarriage

    Elisabeth Clare Larsen;Ole Bjarne Christiansen;Astrid Marie Kolte;Nick Macklon

  • Embryonic implantation: cytokines, adhesion molecules, and immune cells in establishing an implantation environment

    Maaike S. M. van Mourik;Nick S. Macklon;Cobi J. Heijnen

  • Multiple birth resulting from ovarian stimulation for subfertility treatment

    Bart C J M Fauser;Paul Devroey;Nick S Macklon

  • Female reproductive ageing: current knowledge and future trends

    Frank J. Broekmans;Erik A.H. Knauff;Egbert R. te Velde;Nick S. Macklon

  • Natural Selection of Human Embryos: Impaired Decidualization of Endometrium Disables Embryo-Maternal Interactions and Causes Recurrent Pregnancy Loss

    Madhuri Salker;Gijs Teklenburg;Mariam Molokhia;Stuart Lavery

  • A meta-analysis of outcomes of conventional IVF in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

    E.M.E.W. Heijnen;M.J.C. Eijkemans;E.G. Hughes;J.S.E. Laven

  • Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH): what do we still need to know?

    A. La Marca;F.J. Broekmans;A. Volpe;B.C. Fauser

  • A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial

    Esther M. E. W. Heijnen;Esther M. E. W. Heijnen;Marinus J. C. Eijkemans;Marinus J. C. Eijkemans;Cora De Klerk;Suzanne Polinder

  • Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF.

    E. B. Baart;E. Martini;I. Van Den Berg;N. S. Macklon

  • Natural Selection of Human Embryos: Decidualizing Endometrial Stromal Cells Serve as Sensors of Embryo Quality upon Implantation

    Gijs Teklenburg;Madhuri S. Salker;Mariam Molokhia;Stuart Lavery

  • Nonsupplemented Luteal Phase Characteristics after the Administration of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone, or Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist to Induce Final Oocyte Maturation in in Vitro Fertilization Patients after Ovarian Stimulation with Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and GnRH Antagonist Cotreatment

    Nicole G. M. Beckers;Nicholas S. Macklon;Marinus J. Eijkemans;Michael Ludwig

  • Why do couples drop-out from IVF treatment? A prospective cohort study

    M.F.G. Verberg;M.J.C. Eijkemans;M.J.C. Eijkemans;E.M.E.W. Heijnen;F.J. Broekmans

  • A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.

    Femke P. Hohmann;Nicholas S. Macklon;Bart C. J. M. Fauser

  • Uterine Selection of Human Embryos at Implantation

    Jan J. Brosens;Madhuri S. Salker;Gijs Teklenburg;Jaya Nautiyal

  • What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen–thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Eva R. Groenewoud;Astrid E. P. Cantineau;Boudewijn J. Kollen;Nick S. Macklon

  • Pregnancy complications in women with polycystic ovary syndrome.

    Carolien M. Boomsma;Bart C. J. M. Fauser;Nick S. Macklon

Frequent Co-Authors

Bart C.J.M. Fauser
Bart C.J.M. Fauser Utrecht University
Robert J. Norman
Robert J. Norman University of Adelaide
Frank J.M. Broekmans
Frank J.M. Broekmans Utrecht University
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans
Marinus J.C. Eijkemans Utrecht University
Joop S.E. Laven
Joop S.E. Laven Erasmus University Rotterdam
Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen
Cobi Jacoba Johanna Heijnen The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Paul Devroey
Paul Devroey Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Eric A.P. Steegers
Eric A.P. Steegers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Paul Roderick
Paul Roderick University of Southampton
Jan J. Brosens
Jan J. Brosens University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in pursuing a healthcare career but not sure if traditional medical school is right for you, there are a variety of alternative options available online. For example, online schools for health information management offer flexible programs that prepare students for essential roles in organizing and securing medical data.

Administrative healthcare roles are also in high demand. If you want a quicker, cost-effective education, consider exploring medical billing and coding online courses cost to see affordable entry paths into medical coding and records processing.

For those looking to work directly with patients, nursing is a highly respected pathway. There are numerous options for students seeking the most affordable nurse practitioner programs, as well as programs dedicated to those looking for the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs.

Exploring these related online degrees can provide faster and more cost-effective routes into fulfilling healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Nick S. Macklon

Trending Scientists