What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Ecosystem
- Statistics
His scientific interests lie mostly in Ecology, Introduced species, Invasive species, Biological dispersal and Gypsy moth.
His Ecology study incorporates themes from PEST analysis and Allee effect.
His Introduced species research integrates issues from Agroforestry, Natural resource economics and Forest ecology, Ecosystem.
Andrew M. Liebhold interconnects Emerald ash borer, Fraxinus, Saturation and Taxonomic rank in the investigation of issues within Invasive species.
Andrew M. Liebhold has included themes like Choristoneura fumiferana, Spruce budworm, Population density and Trophic level in his Biological dispersal study.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Lymantria dispar, Colonization rate, Overwintering and Predation in addition to Gypsy moth.
His most cited work include:
- Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics (638 citations)
- No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. (636 citations)
- Invasion by Exotic Forest Pests: A Threat to Forest Ecosystems (454 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Ecology, Gypsy moth, Introduced species, Lymantria dispar and Invasive species.
His Ecology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as PEST analysis and Biological dispersal.
He works mostly in the field of Biological dispersal, limiting it down to concerns involving Emerald ash borer and, occasionally, Infestation and Buprestidae.
His study looks at the relationship between Gypsy moth and fields such as Predation, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
His Introduced species research incorporates themes from Biodiversity and Forest ecology, Ecosystem.
His work deals with themes such as Propagule pressure and Allee effect, which intersect with Invasive species.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (87.19%)
- Gypsy moth (24.06%)
- Introduced species (22.19%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Ecology (87.19%)
- Biodiversity (8.13%)
- Biosecurity (8.75%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Andrew M. Liebhold mainly investigates Ecology, Biodiversity, Biosecurity, Biological dispersal and Habitat.
His Ecology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of PEST analysis, Propagule pressure and Allee effect.
His work deals with themes such as Taxonomic rank, Environmental change, Ecosystem and Environmental planning, which intersect with Biodiversity.
His studies in Biosecurity integrate themes in fields like Taxon and Natural resource economics.
His Biological dispersal research incorporates themes from Beech bark disease, Statistics and Biome.
His studies deal with areas such as Invasion pathways and Human mediated dispersal as well as Introduced species.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Global rise in emerging alien species results from increased accessibility of new source pools. (165 citations)
- Scientists' warning on invasive alien species. (67 citations)
- Scientists' warning on invasive alien species. (67 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Statistics
- Ecosystem
His primary areas of study are Ecology, Biodiversity, Introduced species, Biosecurity and Alien species.
His Ecology research integrates issues from PEST analysis and North Atlantic oscillation.
His research integrates issues of Taxonomic rank, Climate change, Species richness and Environmental planning in his study of Biodiversity.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Introduced species, Agriculture, Interception and Alien is strongly linked to Propagule pressure.
He has included themes like Taxon, Species pool, Habitat and Environmental change in his Biosecurity study.
His Alien species study incorporates themes from Biological dispersal, Human mediated dispersal, Invertebrate, Fauna and Invasion pathways.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
