World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
48
Citations
22264
World Ranking
18177
National Ranking
7428

Olivia M. Pereira-Smith publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivia M. Pereira-Smith sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 116 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Olivia M. Pereira-Smith D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olivia M. Pereira-Smith sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olivia M. Pereira-Smith is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio in the United States. This association places them within a prominent institution known for its focus on health sciences and biomedical research.

Details of their recent scholarly output, including individual papers or citations, are not available. Additionally, information regarding frequent collaborators or co-authors has not been provided.

Similarly, the data does not include records of publication venues where they have contributed, nor details on book publications or specific publishers associated with their work.

There is no available information on the main fields or subfields of study that characterize their research. This limits insight into the particular academic disciplines or scientific domains they focus on.

Likewise, no data is given on the core topics addressed in their research, so areas of scientific inquiry, thematic concentrations, or subject matter focus remain undefined.

There are no recorded awards or honors attributed to Olivia M. Pereira-Smith in the sourced data, and they are currently living.

Best Publications

  • A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo

    G P Dimri;X Lee;G Basile;M Acosta

  • Cloning of senescent cell-derived inhibitors of DNA synthesis using an expression screen.

    Asao Noda;Yi Ning;Susan F. Venable;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith

  • Regulation of Alternative Splicing by Histone Modifications

    Reini F. Luco;Qun Pan;Kaoru Tominaga;Benjamin J. Blencowe

  • A role for both RB and p53 in the regulation of human cellular senescence

    Jerry W. Shay;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith;Woodring E. Wright

  • Replicative senescence: implications for in vivo aging and tumor suppression.

    James R. Smith;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith

  • Reversible cellular senescence: implications for immortalization of normal human diploid fibroblasts

    W E Wright;O M Pereira-Smith;J W Shay

  • Genetic analysis of indefinite division in human cells: identification of four complementation groups.

    Olivia M. Pereira-Smith;James R. Smith

  • Replicative senescence of human skin fibroblasts correlates with a loss of regulation and overexpression of collagenase activity

    Michael D. West;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith;James R. Smith

  • Expression of human telomerase (hTERT) does not prevent stress-induced senescence in normal human fibroblasts but protects the cells from stress-induced apoptosis and necrosis.

    Vera Gorbunova;Andrei Seluanov;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith

  • DNA end joining becomes less efficient and more error-prone during cellular senescence

    Andrei Seluanov;David Mittelman;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith;John H. Wilson

  • Upregulation of mortalin/mthsp70/Grp75 contributes to human carcinogenesis.

    Renu Wadhwa;Syuichi Takano;Kamaljit Kaur;Custer C. Deocaris;Custer C. Deocaris

  • Existence of high abundance antiproliferative mRNA's in senescent human diploid fibroblasts.

    CK Lumpkin;JK McClung;OM Pereira-Smith;Smith

  • Genetic analysis of indefinite division in human cells: evidence for a cell senescence-related gene(s) on human chromosome 4.

    Yi Ning;James L. Weber;Ann M. Killary;David H. Ledbetter

  • Senescent cells fail to express cdc2, cycA, and cycB in response to mitogen stimulation.

    Gretchen H. Stein;Linda F. Drullinger;Ryan S. Robetorye;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith

  • Identification of the active region of the DNA synthesis inhibitory gene P21Sdi1/CIP1/WAF1

    Makoto Nakanishi;Ryan S. Robetorye;Guy R. Adami;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith

  • Extramitochondrial localization of mortalin/mthsp70/PBP74/GRP75.

    Qitao Ran;Renu Wadhwa;Rena Kawai;Sunil C. Kaul

  • p53 Is Preferentially Recruited to the Promoters of Growth Arrest Genes p21 and GADD45 during Replicative Senescence of Normal Human Fibroblasts

    James G. Jackson;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith

  • Colony size distributions as a measure of in vivo and in vitro aging

    James R. Smith;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith;Edward L. Schneider

  • Evidence for a p53-independent pathway for upregulation of SDI1/CIP1/WAF1/p21 RNA in human cells.

    Mac Johnson;Diana Dimitrov;Patrick J. Vojta;J. Carl Barrett

  • Competition of CUGBP1 and calreticulin for the regulation of p21 translation determines cell fate

    Polina Iakova;Guo-Li Wang;Lubov Timchenko;Marek Michalak

Frequent Co-Authors

Renu Wadhwa
Renu Wadhwa National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
Makoto Nakanishi
Makoto Nakanishi University of Tokyo
Sunil C. Kaul
Sunil C. Kaul National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
J. Carl Barrett
J. Carl Barrett AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Andrei Seluanov
Andrei Seluanov University of Rochester
Vera Gorbunova
Vera Gorbunova University of Rochester
Nikolai A. Timchenko
Nikolai A. Timchenko Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Martin M. Matzuk
Martin M. Matzuk Baylor College of Medicine
George M. Martin
George M. Martin University of Washington
David H. Ledbetter
David H. Ledbetter University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in studying Biology or Biochemistry, a wide range of online degrees can open doors to rewarding careers in healthcare, research, and administration. For those looking to move into management roles, cahme accredited online mha programs offer top-tier training in healthcare administration, focusing on leadership and organizational skills.

Advanced practitioners might consider online dnp programs, which are ideal for nurses aiming to achieve the highest level of clinical expertise without on-site clinical requirements. Alternatively, professionals aiming for administration at the highest level can explore online doctoral programs healthcare administration for training in strategic planning, policy, and organizational leadership.

For those interested in pharmaceuticals and drug development, earning an advanced pharmacy degree is possible through programs like online pharmd. These online pathways allow for academic flexibility, making it easier to balance professional advancement with personal commitments while preparing for leading roles in healthcare and research.

Best Scientists Citing Olivia M. Pereira-Smith

Trending Scientists