World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Molecular Biology
USA
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
132
Citations
77900
World Ranking
169
National Ranking
106

Woodring E. Wright publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Woodring E. Wright sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 361 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Woodring E. Wright D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Woodring E. Wright sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Molecular Biology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Woodring E. Wright was affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily spanned the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these broad areas, their work touched on subfields such as Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, and Physiology.

The scientist's published research covered several key topics, including:

  • FOXO transcription factor regulation
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • Signaling pathways in disease
  • Telomeres, telomerase, and senescence
  • CRISPR and genetic engineering
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

Notable recent publications included:

  • "FOXP1 Interacts with MyoD to Repress its Transcription and Myoblast Conversion," published in 2021 in the Journal of Cellular Signaling
  • "Human CST promotes telomere duplex replication and general replication restart after fork stalling," published in 2020 in UNC Libraries

These works contributed to understanding molecular transcription factors and mechanisms involved in telomere replication and DNA repair processes.

Throughout their career, Woodring E. Wright collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Chuan Li
  • Changxue Zheng
  • Haley O. Tucker
  • Jason A. Stewart
  • Feng Wang

The main venues where their research appeared were:

  • Journal of Cellular Signaling
  • UNC Libraries

The focus on topics such as FOXO transcription factors and cancer-related molecular mechanisms reflected a sustained interest in the regulatory pathways influencing disease states at a cellular level. The work on telomeres and genetic engineering techniques highlighted engagement with crucial aspects of genome stability and biotechnology.

Best Publications

  • Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer

    Nam W. Kim;Mieczyslaw A. Piatyszek;Karen R. Prowse;Calvin B. Harley

  • EXTENSION OF LIFE-SPAN BY INTRODUCTION OF TELOMERASE INTO NORMAL HUMAN CELLS

    Andrea G. Bodnar;Michel Ouellette;Maria Frolkis;Shawn E. Holt

  • Telomerase activity in human germline and embryonic tissues and cells

    Woodring E. Wright;Mieczyslaw A. Piatyszek;William E. Rainey;William Byrd

  • Myogenin, a Factor Regulating Myogenesis, Has a Domain Homologous to MyoD

    Woodring E. Wright;David A. Sassoon;Victor K. Lin

  • Reconstitution of human telomerase with the template RNA component hTR and the catalytic protein subunit hTRT

    Scott L. Weinrich;Ron Pruzan;Libin Ma;Michel Ouellette

  • Functional activity of myogenic HLH proteins requires hetero-oligomerization with E12/E47-like proteins in vivo

    Andrew B. Lassar;Robert L. Davis;Woodring E. Wright;Tom Kadesch

  • Human Telomerase and Its Regulation

    Yu Sheng Cong;Woodring E. Wright;Jerry W. Shay

  • Pericytes of human skeletal muscle are myogenic precursors distinct from satellite cells.

    Arianna Dellavalle;Maurilio Sampaolesi;Rossana Tonlorenzi;Enrico Tagliafico

  • Hayflick, his limit, and cellular ageing

    Jerry W. Shay;Woodring E. Wright

  • A transcriptionally active DNA-binding site for human p53 protein complexes.

    Walter D. Funk;Daniel T. Pak;Richard H. Karas;Woodring E. Wright

  • Absence of cancer-associated changes in human fibroblasts immortalized with telomerase

    Carmela P. Morales;Shawn E. Holt;Michel M Ouellette;Kiran J. Kaur

  • A role for both RB and p53 in the regulation of human cellular senescence

    Jerry W. Shay;Olivia M. Pereira-Smith;Woodring E. Wright

  • Normal human chromosomes have long G-rich telomeric overhangs at one end

    Woodring E. Wright;Valerie M. Tesmer;Kenneth E. Huffman;Stephen D. Levene

  • Senescence and immortalization: role of telomeres and telomerase

    Jerry W. Shay;Woodring E. Wright

  • Expression of two myogenic regulatory factors myogenin and MyoDl during mouse embryogenesis

    David Sassoon;Gary Lyons;Woodring E. Wright;Victor Lin

  • Functional requirement of p23 and Hsp90 in telomerase complexes

    Shawn E. Holt;Shawn E. Holt;Dara L. Aisner;Joseph Baur;Valerie M. Tesmer

  • Inhibition of human telomerase in immortal human cells leads to progressive telomere shortening and cell death

    B. S. Herbert;A. E. Pitts;S. I. Baker;S. E. Hamilton

  • Telomerase and cancer

    Jerry W. Shay;Ying Zou;Eiso Hiyama;Woodring E. Wright

  • Immortalization of Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells in the Absence of Viral Oncoproteins

    Ruben D. Ramirez;Shelley Sheridan;Luc Girard;Mitsuo Sato

  • Modifications of a telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) result in increased reliability, linearity and sensitivity

    Woodring E. Wright;Jerry W. Shay;Mieczyslaw A. Piatyszek

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerry W. Shay
Jerry W. Shay The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Elizabeth H. Blackburn
Elizabeth H. Blackburn University of California, San Francisco
Sergei M. Gryaznov
Sergei M. Gryaznov MAIA Biotechnology, Inc.
Michael D. West
Michael D. West Advanced Cell Technology (United States)
John D. Minna
John D. Minna The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Calvin B. Harley
Calvin B. Harley Geron (United States)
Joseph A. Baur
Joseph A. Baur University of Pennsylvania
Leonard Hayflick
Leonard Hayflick University of California, San Francisco
Vincent Mouly
Vincent Mouly Université Paris Cité
Michael A. White
Michael A. White Ideaya Biosciences (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Molecular Biology shares many intersections with careers in healthcare and advanced nursing. For students looking to branch into allied fields, there are numerous adn to np programs that provide a streamlined pathway from an Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) to Nurse Practitioner (NP) roles. These bridge programs are ideal for those who already hold a nursing license and want to advance their qualifications while studying online.

Additionally, for those with a bachelor’s degree outside nursing, online msn programs for non nurses offer a direct entry route. These programs can be a strategic choice for graduates with a Molecular Biology background seeking to pursue leadership or specialized positions in nursing and health sciences.

Selecting the right online institution is crucial. Comparing options, such as wgu vs chamberlain, helps prospective students find programs that fit their budget, schedule, and career goals.

For nurses aiming to move ahead in their careers with minimal financial burden, bsn to msn programs online offer an affordable way to earn an advanced degree and unlock greater opportunities in healthcare and research.

Best Scientists Citing Woodring E. Wright

Recently Published Articles