World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
49262
World Ranking
3776
National Ranking
2074

Tracy T. Batchelor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tracy T. Batchelor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 566 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Tracy T. Batchelor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tracy T. Batchelor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tracy T. Batchelor is affiliated with Brigham and Women's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant emphasis on genetics, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, neurology, oncology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

The main topics of their work highlight key areas such as glioma diagnosis and treatment, CNS lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, advanced MRI techniques and applications, lymphoma diagnosis and treatment, brain metastases and treatment, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, and cancer genomics and diagnostics.

Tracy T. Batchelor has contributed extensively to several publication venues, with numerous papers in Neuro-Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Neuro-Oncology Advances, Blood, and conference proceedings related to magnetic resonance in medicine.

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions (2020, Neuro-Oncology)
  • Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of hypermutation in gliomas (2020, Nature)
  • Diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic implications of the 2021 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system (2021, Cancer)
  • Cancer neuroscience: State of the field, emerging directions (2023, Cell)
  • Genomic characterization of human brain metastases identifies drivers of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (2020, Nature Genetics)

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues such as Jörg Dietrich, Patrick Y. Wen, Eudocia Q. Lee, Ugonma Chukwueke, and Daniel P. Cahill, indicating a broad network of co-authorship within their field.

Best Publications

  • AZD2171, a Pan-VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Normalizes Tumor Vasculature and Alleviates Edema in Glioblastoma Patients

    Tracy T. Batchelor;A. Gregory Sorensen;A. Gregory Sorensen;Emmanuelle di Tomaso;Wei Ting Zhang;Wei Ting Zhang

  • An Integrative Model of Cellular States, Plasticity, and Genetics for Glioblastoma

    Cyril Neftel;Julie Laffy;Mariella G. Filbin;Toshiro Hara

  • Angiogenesis in brain tumours

    Rakesh K. Jain;Emmanuelle di Tomaso;Dan G. Duda;Jay S. Loeffler

  • Gene expression-based classification of malignant gliomas correlates better with survival than histological classification.

    Catherine L. Nutt;D. R. Mani;Rebecca A. Betensky;Pablo Tamayo

  • Genomic Characterization of Brain Metastases Reveals Branched Evolution and Potential Therapeutic Targets

    Priscilla K. Brastianos;Scott L. Carter;Scott L. Carter;Sandro Santagata;Sandro Santagata;Daniel P. Cahill

  • Report of an International Workshop to Standardize Baseline Evaluation and Response Criteria for Primary CNS Lymphoma

    Lauren E. Abrey;Tracy T. Batchelor;Andrés J.M. Ferreri;Mary Gospodarowicz

  • Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions

    Patrick Y. Wen;Michael Weller;Eudocia Quant Lee;Brian M. Alexander

  • Developmental and oncogenic programs in H3K27M gliomas dissected by single-cell RNA-seq

    Mariella G. Filbin;Itay Tirosh;Itay Tirosh;Volker Hovestadt;Volker Hovestadt;McKenzie L. Shaw;McKenzie L. Shaw

  • Biomarkers of response and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy.

    Rakesh K. Jain;Dan G. Duda;Christopher G. Willett;Dushyant V. Sahani

  • Mechanisms and therapeutic implications of hypermutation in gliomas.

    Mehdi Touat;Mehdi Touat;Mehdi Touat;Yvonne Y. Li;Yvonne Y. Li;Adam N. Boynton;Adam N. Boynton;Liam F. Spurr;Liam F. Spurr

  • Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma With Methotrexate and Deferred Radiotherapy: A Report of NABTT 96–07

    Tracy Batchelor;Kathryn Carson;Alison O’Neill;Stuart A. Grossman

  • Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Cediranib As Monotherapy, and in Combination With Lomustine, Versus Lomustine Alone in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma

    Tracy T Batchelor;Paul Mulholland;Bart Neyns;L Burt Nabors

  • Phase II Study of Cediranib, an Oral Pan–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma

    Tracy T. Batchelor;Dan G. Duda;Emmanuelle di Tomaso;Marek Ancukiewicz

  • Strategies to advance translational research into brain barriers

    Edward Neuwelt;N Joan Abbott;Lauren Abrey;William A Banks

  • Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: A Report from an International Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Collaborative Group Symposium

    Chi Chao Chan;James L. Rubenstein;Sarah E. Coupland;Janet L. Davis

  • Primary CNS Lymphoma

    Tracy Batchelor;Jay S. Loeffler

  • Randomized Trial of a Slow-Release Versus a Standard Formulation of Cytarabine for the Intrathecal Treatment of Lymphomatous Meningitis

    Michael J. Glantz;Suzanne LaFollette;Kurt A. Jaeckle;William Shapiro

  • Loss of the Mismatch Repair Protein MSH6 in Human Glioblastomas Is Associated with Tumor Progression during Temozolomide Treatment

    Daniel P. Cahill;Kymberly K. Levine;Rebecca A. Betensky;Patrick J. Codd

  • A Hypermutation Phenotype and Somatic MSH6 Mutations in Recurrent Human Malignant Gliomas after Alkylator Chemotherapy

    Chris Hunter;Raffaella Smith;Daniel P. Cahill;Philip Stephens

  • Detection of 2-Hydroxyglutarate in IDH-Mutated Glioma Patients by In Vivo Spectral-Editing and 2D Correlation Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

    Ovidiu C. Andronesi;Grace S. Kim;Elizabeth Gerstner;Tracy Batchelor

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Y. Wen
Patrick Y. Wen Harvard University
Rakesh K. Jain
Rakesh K. Jain Harvard University
David N. Louis
David N. Louis Harvard University
David A. Reardon
David A. Reardon Harvard University
Keith L. Ligon
Keith L. Ligon Harvard University
Stuart A. Grossman
Stuart A. Grossman Johns Hopkins University
Dan G. Duda
Dan G. Duda Harvard University
Rameen Beroukhim
Rameen Beroukhim Harvard University
Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
David Schiff
David Schiff University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in medicine but looking for flexible study options or alternative career pathways? There are a variety of online degrees available to help you enter or advance within the healthcare field. Programs offering medical billing and coding training are a popular entry point, and many prospective students research how much is medical billing and coding school to determine affordability and return on investment.

Nursing is another in-demand field with many online education options. If you’re aiming to become an advanced practice nurse, you should explore the cheapest fnp programs that can prepare you for a dynamic role as a family nurse practitioner. Those considering entry-level or bridge nursing programs often want to know how much is online nursing school to compare costs across accredited institutions.

For nurses looking to move into leadership, research, or academic roles, an online doctoral degree may be the next step. You can learn more about these advanced opportunities by reviewing the most accessible programs for a phd in nursing.

Best Scientists Citing Tracy T. Batchelor

Trending Scientists