World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
122
Citations
52013
World Ranking
506
National Ranking
298

Medicine

D-Index
126
Citations
57531
World Ranking
2966
National Ranking
1642

Lisa M. DeAngelis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. DeAngelis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 566 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lisa M. DeAngelis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. DeAngelis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 126 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2012 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Lisa M. DeAngelis is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with significant contributions in several subfields including Genetics, Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

They have been involved in studies covering a variety of topics related to oncology and hematology with a focus on diagnosis and treatment of neurological and lymphatic cancers. Major research areas include:

  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Research
  • Management of Metastatic Bone Disease

The scientific output of Lisa M. DeAngelis includes numerous publications in well-known venues such as:

  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Annals of Neurology
  • Neuro-Oncology Advances
  • Neurology

Some of their recent research papers encompass the following:

  • Randomized Phase II Trial of Proton Craniospinal Irradiation Versus Photon Involved-Field Radiotherapy for Patients With Solid Tumor Leptomeningeal Metastasis (2022, Journal of Clinical Oncology)
  • Clinical Trial of Proton Craniospinal Irradiation for Leptomeningeal Metastases (2020, Neuro-Oncology)
  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Circulating Tumor Cells as a Quantifiable Measurement of Leptomeningeal Metastases in Patients with HER2 Positive Cancer (2020, Journal of Neuro-Oncology)
  • Mechanisms of Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Cancer: A Prospective Study (2021, Annals of Neurology)
  • Randomized Phase II Study of Rituximab, Methotrexate, Procarbazine, Vincristine, and Cytarabine with and without Low-Dose Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma (2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology)

Lisa M. DeAngelis has collaborated frequently with a number of coauthors, most notably:

  • Lauren Schaff
  • Ingo K. Mellinghoff
  • Elena Pentsova
  • Christian Grommes
  • Anna F. Piotrowski

The scientist was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine in 2012, reflecting a formal acknowledgment within the medical research community.

Best Publications

  • Tumor mutational load predicts survival after immunotherapy across multiple cancer types.

    Robert M Samstein;Chung-Han Lee;Chung-Han Lee;Alexander N Shoushtari;Alexander N Shoushtari;Matthew D Hellmann;Matthew D Hellmann

  • Glioblastoma and Other Malignant Gliomas: A Clinical Review

    Antonio Omuro;Lisa M. DeAngelis

  • Radiation-induced dementia in patients cured of brain metastases.

    Lisa M. DeAngelis;Jean-Yves Delattre;Jerome B. Posner

  • Report of an International Workshop to Standardize Baseline Evaluation and Response Criteria for Primary CNS Lymphoma

    Lauren E. Abrey;Tracy T. Batchelor;Andrés J.M. Ferreri;Mary Gospodarowicz

  • Clinical and Biological Correlates of Neurotoxicity Associated with CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

    Bianca D. Santomasso;Jae H. Park;Darin Salloum;Isabelle Riviere

  • Combination Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 93-10

    Lisa M. DeAngelis;Wendy Seiferheld;S. Clifford Schold;Barbara Fisher

  • Treatment for Primary CNS Lymphoma: The Next Step

    Lauren E. Abrey;Joachim Yahalom;Lisa M. DeAngelis

  • Long-term survival in primary CNS lymphoma.

    Lauren E. Abrey;Lisa M. DeAngelis;Joachim Yahalom

  • Treatment of brain tumors

    Arnold C. Paulino;Bin S. Teh;Michelle Sadeh;Lynn Ashby

  • Combined modality therapy for primary CNS lymphoma.

    Lisa M. DeAngelis;Joachim Yahalom;Howard T. Thaler;Uma Kher

  • Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Prognostic Model

    Lauren E. Abrey;Leah Ben-Porat;Katherine S. Panageas;Joachim Yahalom

  • Risk of Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer

    Babak B. Navi;Anne S. Reiner;Hooman Kamel;Costantino Iadecola

  • Primary CNS Lymphoma

    Christian Grommes;Lisa M. DeAngelis

  • Rituximab, Methotrexate, Procarbazine, and Vincristine Followed by Consolidation Reduced-Dose Whole-Brain Radiotherapy and Cytarabine in Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma: Final Results and Long-Term Outcome

    Patrick G. Morris;Denise D. Correa;Joachim Yahalom;Jeffrey J. Raizer

  • Neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid cytology in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastasis

    Ronnie J. Freilich;George Krol;Lisa M. Deangelis

  • Combined Immunochemotherapy With Reduced Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma

    Gaurav D. Shah;Joachim Yahalom;Denise D. Correa;Rose K. Lai

  • Phase I/II Study of Imatinib Mesylate for Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 99-08

    Patrick Y. Wen;W. K Alfred Yung;Kathleen R. Lamborn;Patricia L. Dahia

  • Tracking tumour evolution in glioma through liquid biopsies of cerebrospinal fluid

    Alexandra M. Miller;Ronak H. Shah;Elena I. Pentsova;Maryam Pourmaleki

  • Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas.

    Kathleen R. Lamborn;W. K.Alfred Yung;Susan M. Chang;Patrick Y. Wen

  • Leptomeningeal metastases in the MRI era

    J.L. Clarke;H.R. Perez;L.M. Jacks;K.S. Panageas

Frequent Co-Authors

Lauren E. Abrey
Lauren E. Abrey University of Zurich
Patrick Y. Wen
Patrick Y. Wen Harvard University
Ingo K. Mellinghoff
Ingo K. Mellinghoff Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Timothy F. Cloughesy
Timothy F. Cloughesy University of California, Los Angeles
Katherine S. Panageas
Katherine S. Panageas Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael D. Prados
Michael D. Prados University of California, San Francisco
Mark R. Gilbert
Mark R. Gilbert National Institutes of Health
Marc K. Rosenblum
Marc K. Rosenblum Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Susan M. Chang
Susan M. Chang University of California, San Francisco
Minesh P. Mehta
Minesh P. Mehta University of Maryland, Baltimore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn't always require the traditional path. Many students and working professionals are considering flexible, online options to advance their education and career prospects in healthcare. Whether you are at the beginning of your journey or looking to specialize, a range of accredited online nursing courses are now available, offering robust foundational knowledge and practical skills for aspiring healthcare workers.

For those looking to become registered nurses with minimal financial burden, several online nursing courses provide affordable entry points. Nurses aiming to deepen their expertise can pursue advanced credentials, such as a Doctor of Nursing Practice, through cheapest online DNP programs, making high-level leadership roles more accessible.

Registered nurses seeking to elevate their qualifications can benefit from cheap RN to BSN online programs, which are designed to be flexible and affordable for working professionals. Likewise, individuals with non-nursing backgrounds interested in transitioning to nursing can consider online MSN programs for non nurses to quickly gain specialized skills and credentials.

With a wide range of accredited and cost-effective online degrees, pursuing a medical or nursing career is becoming more accessible, supporting diverse pathways to meaningful roles in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. DeAngelis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles