World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
44826
World Ranking
7288
National Ranking
3817

Ian H. de Boer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian H. de Boer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 431 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ian H. de Boer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian H. de Boer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian H. de Boer is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has a research focus primarily in medicine, with significant contributions to the fields of endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, nephrology, molecular biology, genetics, and pathology and forensic medicine.

The scientist's work encompasses several main topics related to diabetes and kidney health, including diabetes management and research, diabetes treatment and management, chronic kidney disease and diabetes, vitamin D research studies, diabetes and associated disorders, dialysis and renal disease management, and diet and metabolism studies.

Notable recent papers by Ian H. de Boer include:

  • KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) published in Kidney International
  • Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2022) published in Diabetes Care
  • Diabetes management in chronic kidney disease: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) (2022) published in Kidney International

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ian H. de Boer include Leila R. Zelnick, Bryan Kestenbaum, Andrew N. Hoofnagle, Christine P. Limonte, and Katherine R. Tuttle, with numerous joint publications reflecting sustained research partnerships.

The scientist has published extensively in a range of venues, with the most frequent publication outlets being the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Kidney International, Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Diabetes Care, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Best Publications

  • Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Report From an ADA Consensus Conference

    Katherine R. Tuttle;George L. Bakris;Rudolf W. Bilous;Jane L. Chiang

  • Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study

    Thomas J. Wang;Feng Zhang;J. Brent Richards;Bryan Kestenbaum

  • Kidney Disease and Increased Mortality Risk in Type 2 Diabetes

    Maryam Afkarian;Michael C. Sachs;Bryan Kestenbaum;Irl B. Hirsch

  • Temporal Trends in the Prevalence of Diabetic Kidney Disease in the United States

    Ian H. de Boer;Tessa C. Rue;Yoshio N. Hall;Patrick J. Heagerty

  • New loci associated with kidney function and chronic kidney disease

    Anna Köttgen;Anna Köttgen;Cristian Pattaro;Carsten A. Böger;Christian Fuchsberger

  • Update on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Light of Recent Evidence: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association.

    Caroline S. Fox;Sherita Hill Golden;Cheryl Anderson;George A. Bray

  • Clinical manifestations of kidney disease among US adults with diabetes, 1988-2014

    Maryam Afkarian;Leila R. Zelnick;Yoshio N. Hall;Patrick J. Heagerty

  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association.

    Sarah D. de Ferranti;Ian H. de Boer;Vivian Fonseca;Caroline S. Fox

  • KDIGO 2020 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease

    Ian H. de Boer;M. Luiza Caramori;Juliana C.N. Chan;Hiddo J.L. Heerspink

  • Multiple loci associated with indices of renal function and chronic kidney disease

    Anna Köttgen;Nicole L. Glazer;Abbas Dehghan;Shih Jen Hwang

  • Diabetes and Hypertension: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association

    Ian H. De Boer;Sripal Bangalore;Athanase Benetos;Andrew M. Davis

  • Intensive diabetes therapy and glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetes

    Ian H. De Boer;Wanjie Sun;Patricia A. Cleary;John M. Lachin

  • Genetic associations at 53 loci highlight cell types and biological pathways relevant for kidney function

    Cristian Pattaro;Alexander Teumer;Mathias Gorski;Audrey Y. Chu

  • Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of incident diabetes in the Women's Health Initiative.

    Ian H. de Boer;Lesley F. Tinker;Stephanie Connelly;J. David Curb

  • Association between Physical Performance and All-Cause Mortality in CKD

    Baback Roshanravan;Cassianne Robinson-Cohen;Kushang V. Patel;Ernest Ayers

  • Long-term Renal Outcomes of Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Microalbuminuria: An Analysis of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Cohort

    Ian H. de Boer;Tessa C. Rue;Patricia A. Cleary;John M. Lachin

  • Genome-wide Association Study in 79,366 European-ancestry Individuals Informs the Genetic Architecture of 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels

    Xia Jiang;Xia Jiang;Paul F. O'Reilly;Hugues Aschard;Hugues Aschard;Yi Hsiang Hsu;Yi Hsiang Hsu

  • 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Albuminuria in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III)

    Ian H. de Boer;George N. Ioannou;Bryan Kestenbaum;John D. Brunzell

  • Fibroblast growth factor-23 and death, heart failure, and cardiovascular events in community-living individuals: CHS (Cardiovascular Health Study).

    Joachim H. Ix;Ronit Katz;Bryan R. Kestenbaum;Ian H. de Boer

  • Development and Progression of Renal Insufficiency With and Without Albuminuria in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial and the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study

    Mark E Molitch;Michael W. Steffes;Wanjie Sun;Brandy Rutledge

Frequent Co-Authors

Bryan Kestenbaum
Bryan Kestenbaum University of Washington
Joachim H. Ix
Joachim H. Ix University of California, San Diego
David S. Siscovick
David S. Siscovick University of Washington
Michael G. Shlipak
Michael G. Shlipak University of California, San Francisco
Ronit Katz
Ronit Katz University of Washington
Jonathan Himmelfarb
Jonathan Himmelfarb University of Washington
Bruce M. Psaty
Bruce M. Psaty University of Washington
Mark J. Sarnak
Mark J. Sarnak Tufts Medical Center
Kenneth J. Mukamal
Kenneth J. Mukamal Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Erin D. Michos
Erin D. Michos Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Medicine, exploring online nursing degrees can open alternative career pathways in healthcare. For those seeking accelerated options, the online msn programs for non nurses provide a way for individuals with non-nursing backgrounds to earn a master’s in nursing and move into advanced health roles quickly.

Cost is a significant factor when choosing a program. Many students look for the cheapest online bsn programs or compare the cheapest rn to bsn program online to save on tuition while earning a credible degree. These affordable programs help future nurses reduce financial barriers while maintaining flexibility and quality education.

For those aiming for leadership or academic roles, earning a phd in nursing online offers a clear pathway. These degree options allow healthcare professionals to advance their expertise and make a broader impact, either in research, clinical practice, or educational settings.

Best Scientists Citing Ian H. de Boer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles